Share this @internewscast.com
Mo Salah has consistently been reserved about publicly discussing Islam or the Middle East in ways that might categorize him strictly as a Muslim. While his faith is a significant aspect of his identity, he has preferred not to be solely defined by it.
In the biography titled “Chasing Salah,” with excerpts published by Daily Mail Sport last year, author and journalist Simon Hughes details how Salah’s participation in a magazine cover story was conditional upon his and his agent, Ramy Abbas, agreeing with the proposed headline.
However, when they learned the headline would be ‘The World’s Favourite Muslim,’ Abbas, on Salah’s behalf, turned it down. This mirrored the response when Salah was asked to be part of a positive narrative about Muslims following the 2017 Manchester Arena attack by an Islamic terrorist, which resulted in 22 fatalities.
Although Salah hasn’t explicitly expressed his reasons, it’s difficult to ignore the potential influence of one of his early teammates from the Egyptian club El Mokawloon, situated in a Cairo suburb, on his stance. Hughes’ thoroughly investigated book elucidates Mohamed Samara’s significant impact on Salah—Samara being a player born to Palestinian parents in Cairo and representing the Palestinian national team.
Samara acted as a mentor and confidant during Salah’s early years at the professional level. As an experienced 28-year-old, he shared insights on the political landscape of the nation with the young Salah, who evidently looked up to him.

Mo Salah’s involvement with Palestine finds its roots in his time playing for a club in Egypt. His Palestinian teammate, Mohamed Samara, was a pivotal influence, which has now led him to speak out.

Suleiman Al Obeid, known to thousands in his own country, as the ‘Palestinian Pele’.’ He was killed in an attack on Gaza earlier this month, leading Salah to demand answers
The contours of their relationship returned to mind when Salah tweeted a response to UEFA’s social media post about Palestinian player, Suleiman Al Obeid, who was killed while queuing for food in Khan Younis, in southern Gaza, earlier this month.
UEFA’s tweeted message about Al Obeid on August 8 included no mention of the circumstances of his death, leading Salah to reply: ‘Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?’ Eyewitnesses suggest he was killed by armaments dropped from an Israeli quadcopter drone. One of his family members told the Washington Post he was killed by shrapnel from an Israeli tank shell. Images of Al Obeid’s brother, Ahmed in a tent after the same alleged attack revealed a deep, stitched scar running down his stomach
Salah would certainly have known of Al Obeid – one of the most recognisable and popular figures in Palestinian soccer, remembered for his scissor kick goal against Yemen in the 2010 West Asian Football Federation Championship, for 24 appearances in the Palestine national team, and for the inspirational figure he became to young players in the Gaza Strip, where the sport commands a devoted following. Many called the 43-year-old the ‘Palestinian Pele.’ He was also known as ‘Henry’, after Thierry Henry, whose style he mimicked. He is survived by a wife, Doaa, and five children. His widow relates how this once venerated player would wear a cap to hide his identity when queuing for food, as he was ashamed to be in need of hand-outs.
There is such a deeply depressing lack of proportionality when it comes to the current assessment of Palestine that you speak for individuals like Suleiman Al Obeid at your peril.
UEFA have found themselves castigated in some quarters for issuing a message about him at all – the accusation levelled at them being that they offered no such public communication about Lior Asulin, the 43-year-old Israeli striker who played professional club football in Israel and who was killed by Hamas terrorists at a music festival in the October 7 attacks.
It has been suggested that Salah might better direct his ‘well meaning’ focus on his own country’s reluctance to grant access to Palestinian refugees. His intervention has been characterised as intellectually flawed: a performative ‘playing to the gallery.’
Such breathtaking and patronising condescension for an individual who, as the biography I cite reveals, is very much a man of his own mind. Any line of attack goes, it would appear, for those who push the dodgy thesis that Hamas’ slaughter of 1,195 Israelis 22 months ago denies anyone, Egyptian footballer or otherwise, the right to pose a question about the dismemberment of a country in which a quarter of all inhabitants – more than 500,000 people – are now starving, according to the UN and multiple international aid organisations.

Suleiman Al Obeid’s widow, Doaa, with one of the shirts he played in. She said her husband dreamed of teaching their five children football, a sport he never stopped playing

Mrs Al Obeid with four of their children, in their makeshift tent home in Gaza City, two days after her husband’s death. She said her life would never be the same
The death toll of Palestinian footballers alone since October 2023 is 414, according to the Palestinian Football Association, including 103 who are classified as children. More than 1,500 health workers have been killed, too, along with more than 200 journalists, according to Reporters Without Borders. Part of a total death toll of 60,000. The ‘double-tap’ bombing of a hospital this week added a further 20, five of them journalists.
The i Paper’s Katherine Lucas put some perspective on that figure of 414 footballers, a few weeks back, observing that it equated to the entirety of the England football squad, 17 times over, and that the world would very much know about this, were it ‘our’ number.
The Palestinian figure is barely known, as much a part of the fog of that country’s destruction as the names of those players who have perished alongside Al Obeid. Mohammed Barakat, Ismail Abu Dan, Shadi Abu al-Araj to name a few more who you will not have heard of.
It the video message he issued, Salah did not exude the confidence we are accustomed to seeing from him on the field. This was clearly not his natural domain. Yet what he offered the world was wise. ‘All lives are sacred and must be protected,’ he said. ‘The escalations are painful to witness.’ Surely even those bound up with their obsessions about bias could not argue with that?