MSNBC Trivializes the Holocaust to Score Political Points on Trump and 'Alligator Alcatraz'
Share this @internewscast.com

The article, “Don’t call it ‘Alligator Alcatraz.’ Call it a concentration camp,” draws a comparison that is so historically misguided that it hinders essential discussions about immigration policy that we must engage in within this country.

The Fundamental Difference That Matters

What the author either fails to grasp or intentionally overlooks is the crucial legal and ethical difference between detaining individuals who have crossed the border illegally and forcibly incarcerating lawful citizens and residents who have committed no crimes whatsoever.

Nazi concentration camps held German citizens whose sole “offense” was their ethnicity or religious beliefs. During World War II, Japanese American citizens and legal residents were interned without having committed any crimes or presenting any legitimate security risks. Such actions represented severe breaches of constitutional rights and human dignity.

Even going back further, comparing “Alligator Alcatraz” to the forced removal of Native Americans to reservations isn’t a valid comparison, because the U.S. policy at that time, however flawed, was based on the idea of integrating them into American life while achieving the strategic goal of Manifest Destiny. That in no way compares to what’s happening today.

The Everglades facility, whatever its flaws, is designed to detain people who are in the United States in violation of federal immigration law. That’s not persecution based on ethnicity—it’s enforcement of established legal procedures for people who don’t have legal status to remain in the country.

These include not just those who violated immigration law, but also have committed serious crimes either before or during their time in the country.


READ MORE:


Why This Comparison Is Dangerous

When commentators throw around terms like “concentration camp” to describe immigration enforcement, they’re not just being historically irresponsible. They’re purposefully poisoning the well for serious policy discussions.

You want to criticize the conditions at detention facilities? Fine. You want to argue about the scale and speed of enforcement operations? That’s a legitimate debate. You want to question whether mass detention is the most effective approach to immigration enforcement? Have at it. I’m fine with those questions and have even raised some of them myself.

But when you start comparing lawful immigration enforcement to the systematic persecution of legal citizens and residents, you’ve abandoned serious policy analysis in favor of inflammatory rhetoric designed to generate clicks and outrage while continuing to further compare Donald Trump to Hitler, which is a favorite pastime of the Democrats.

The Real Policy Questions We Should Be Discussing

Instead of resorting to historically inappropriate comparisons, we should be having honest conversations about immigration enforcement that acknowledge both the complexity of the issue and the legitimate concerns on all sides.

Are detention facilities operating under appropriate conditions? Are enforcement operations being conducted professionally and legally? Are there more effective ways to process immigration cases and ensure people show up for their hearings?

These are the questions that matter for actual policy-making. There have been plenty of reports (yes, some inflated by the media, but some also legitimately worrisome) of arrests and deportations that should not have been made. But you can’t have those conversations when one side is comparing immigration detention to the Holocaust.

Historical Context Matters

The author of this piece claims to have written “a global history of concentration camps,” but somehow missed the most important distinction in that history: the difference between detaining people who violated immigration law and systematically persecuting legal citizens and residents based on their ethnicity or religion.

Japanese American internment was wrong precisely because it targeted American citizens and legal residents who had committed no crimes. Nazi concentration camps were horrific because they systematically imprisoned, tortured, and murdered people based on their ethnicity, religion, and political beliefs, not their legal status.

Drawing equivalencies between these historical atrocities and current immigration enforcement is morally offensive to the memory of those who suffered and died in actual concentration camps.

What This Rhetoric Actually Accomplishes

Here’s what happens when political commentators use inflammatory language like “concentration camp” to describe immigration enforcement: they make it harder for reasonable people to discuss real solutions to immigration challenges.

They also trivialize genuine historical atrocities by comparing them to contemporary policy disagreements. When everything becomes a “concentration camp” or “fascism,” those terms lose their meaning and their power to describe actual authoritarian behavior when it occurs.

History matters, and words have meaning. The progressive compulsion to call everything “fascist” or compare everything a Republican president, regardless of who it is, does to Hitler demeans the words and the history behind those claims. It’s simply gross and inappropriate.

The Path Forward

We can have serious debates about immigration policy without resorting to historically inappropriate comparisons. We can criticize enforcement operations without comparing them to the Holocaust. We can advocate for the humane treatment of detainees without trivializing the experiences of concentration camp victims.

But that requires commentators to approach these issues with intellectual honesty rather than inflammatory rhetoric designed to generate outrage and social media engagement.

The immigration debate deserves better than MSNBC’s latest contribution to the discourse. And so do the memories of those who actually suffered in concentration camps.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
Boeing settles with a man whose family died in a 737 Max crash in Ethiopia

Boeing Reaches Settlement with Man After 737 Max Crash Claims His Family in Ethiopia

Boeing reached an agreement on Friday with a Canadian man whose wife…
Billie Holiday, location manager for Marvel's 'Ironheart' Disney+ series, takes ABC7 on tour of Chicago sites featured in TV show

Billie Holiday, the location manager for Marvel’s ‘Ironheart’ on Disney+, gives ABC7 an inside tour of the Chicago locations showcased in the series

CHICAGO (WLS) — Chicago provides the landscape and inspiration for Marvel’s new…
Motorcycle police officer writing a traffic ticket.

New Law Imposes ‘$5 Per Mile’ Fine for Drivers from August 1, Alongside Increased Parking Ticket Fees

TICKET fees are about to face a major hike for certain drivers…
Authorities say about 200 immigrants arrested in raids on 2 Southern California farms

Officials Report Arrest of Approximately 200 Immigrants During Raids at Two Southern California Farms

CAMARILLO, Calif. (AP) — On Friday, federal immigration authorities announced the arrest…
Singer Chris Brown pleads not guilty to 2 further charges over London nightclub assault case

Chris Brown Maintains Innocence Against Additional London Nightclub Assault Charges

LONDON — Grammy-winning singer Chris Brown on Friday entered a not guilty…
Close-up of Maria Shalaeva.

Putin Official Accused of Using $100M Military Jets to Fly Young Mistress Amid Kremlin Scandal

A SEX scandal has shaken the Kremlin as a high-ranking Putin official…
Airport security subdues a disruptive passenger.

Dramatic Scene: Woman Throws Temper Tantrum at Airport, Screams at Police Before Being Arrested

THIS is the shocking moment a furious passenger had a full-blown foot-stomping…
EMBARGOED TO 0001 SUNDAY JULY 6 File photo dated 10/06/25 of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a reception for London Tech Week, at no 10 Downing Street, London. Sir Keir Starmer has been urged not to "punish" children by keeping the two-child cap following Labour's U-turn on benefit cuts. The SNP urged the Prime Minister to end the limit amid reports it could stay as a result of Labour scrapping most of its welfare reforms. Issue date: Sunday July 6, 2025. PA Photo. Photo credit should read: Jordan Pettitt/PA Wire

Keir Affirms His Commitment to ‘Island of Strangers’ Message, Emphasizing the Need for UK to Be an Integrated Society

SIR Keir Starmer has affirmed his ongoing commitment to the message behind…
2026 midterm elections: What the next election cycle means for Illinois Democratic Party as several Congressional seats open up

Upcoming 2026 Midterm Elections: Impact on Illinois Democratic Party with Multiple Congressional Seats Opening

The political environment in Illinois is poised for a notable transformation with…
El Chapo's son pleads guilty to US drug trafficking

El Chapo’s Son Admits Guilt in US Drug Trafficking Case

As part of a plea agreement, Guzman Lopez admitted to helping oversee…

22-Year-Old Woman Allegedly Murdered by Online Acquaintance After Expressing Friendship Intentions; ‘Gruesome Scene’ Discovered

A 22-year-old woman reportedly told a man that she wasn’t interested in…
Georgia teen who raised 'awareness' about mother, stepfather's deaths on TikTok now charged with their murder

Georgia Teen Who Publicly Mourned Parents on TikTok Is Now Charged with Their Murders

In Georgia, a teenage girl is facing charges for the alleged murders…