Share this @internewscast.com

Key Points

  • In a 6-3 decision, the justices ruled that the law at issue did not grant Trump the power he claimed to impose tariffs.
  • Trump has vowed to pursue tariffs through other legal authorities.

President Donald Trump expressed intense disapproval following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that he lacks the authority to impose tariffs on imports unilaterally. He criticized the justices individually and pledged to utilize other legislation to continue his international trade strategies.

The Supreme Court’s significant 6-3 decision on Friday disrupted the influence Trump and his trade representatives previously exerted over both allied and adversarial nations during negotiations aimed at altering diplomatic ties and global market dynamics.

This ruling cast doubt on numerous trade agreements brokered by his team recently, which were negotiated under the looming threat of steep tariffs.

The decision also propelled all three major U.S. stock indexes to their highest points in weeks. It further raised questions about the future of the $175 billion Trump accumulated from U.S. importers due to what the court identified as a misinterpretation of the law.

“I’m deeply disappointed in certain court members, utterly disappointed for failing to do what’s best for our nation,” Trump declared to reporters at the White House, asserting that foreign nations were celebrating the verdict and “rejoicing openly.”

He suggested, without offering proof, that corruption influenced the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts: “Their actions are very unpatriotic and betray our Constitution. I believe the court has been influenced by foreign interests and a political agenda far less significant than anyone could imagine.”

Since returning to the White House 13 months ago, Trump has said he had what the court summarised as the “extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope.”

Citing a national emergency, he said the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) meant he could set tariffs at any rate he chose.

The court’s ruling was blunt: Trump has not proved that the president has this power, and exceeded his authority. A tariff levied on US importers is a tax ‌like any other, the court said, and the Constitution reserves the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” to Congress.

In response, an angry Trump said he would invoke other laws to collect tariffs, and announced a blanket 10 per cent tariff on imports from all other countries, on top of any existing non-IEEPA tariff.

Donald Trump, with a stern expression on his face.
Donald Trump accused Supreme Court judges of being “swayed by foreign interests”. Source: AAP / ABACAPRESS.COM / Sipa USA / Yuri Gripas

In doing so, he became the first president to invoke Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, in which Congress said the president could levy tariffs of up to 15 per cent for up to 150 days to fix “fundamental ⁠international payments problems”.


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
Three US fighter jets accidentally shot down by 'friendly fire'

Friendly Fire Fiasco: US Fighter Jets Downed in Shocking Military Blunder

On Monday, a mishap involving “friendly fire” led to the crash of…
One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson slaps herself on the wrist.

Pauline Hanson Exits Parliamentary Session in Protest Following Censure Decision

One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson has slapped her wrist and stormed out…

South Sudan Tragedy: Attack Claims 169 Lives, 90 Civilians Among Victims

In brief Death toll from an attack by a group of unidentified…
Fierce red rash spotted on Trump's neck

Mysterious Red Rash Appears on Trump’s Neck: What Could It Mean?

A new rash on the right side of US President Donald Trump‘s…

Pauline Hanson Faces Censure for Controversial Comments on Muslim Community

IN BRIEF The censure motion passed with Labor and Greens’ backing, but…
A glitch at an Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centre in the US left millions around the world unable to access half the internet, but how exactly did it cause the widespread disruption?

Amazon Services Disrupted in Middle East Amid Facility Strikes: Impact on E-commerce and Delivery

Several Amazon Web Services are down in the Middle East after three…
One crew member was winched down, balancing on top of the cabin as the driver clung on.He attached the harness and both were brought to safety

Heroic Rescue: Trucker Saved from Life-Threatening Outback Floods

A dramatic rescue unfolded when a truck driver was airlifted to safety…

Live Updates: Rising Death Toll in Middle East Conflict; Trump Warns of Protracted War

Overnight in Australia, tensions have escalated as the conflict involving the US…
'We will kill you': Chilling US threat as war spirals

U.S. Issues Grave Warning Amid Escalating Conflict

The war in the Middle East has spiralled further as Israel and…

Who’s in charge of Iran, and what is the process for selecting a new Supreme Leader?

The 36-year tenure of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the autocratic leader of Iran,…
A prominent businessman's appeal against a legal‑costs order from a previously private family dispute with his DJ ex has backfired - forcing the case into open court and allowing both parties to be named for the first time. (Pictured: Matthew Pringle and Olivia Nervo)

Prominent Figures Revealed in High-Profile Family Dispute: Noted DJ and Business Mogul’s Case Goes Public, Potentially Impacting His Fortune

A high-profile businessman’s attempt to overturn a legal-costs ruling from a past…
Mehdi Taj (left) has said Iran may not compete in this summer's 'inappropriate' World Cup

Iran Considers Withdrawing from US World Cup 101 Days Before Kickoff Following Tensions

Iran might withdraw from this summer’s World Cup in the United States,…