Share this @internewscast.com

Key Points

  • In a 6-3 decision, the justices ruled that the law at issue did not grant Trump the power he claimed to impose tariffs.
  • Trump has vowed to pursue tariffs through other legal authorities.

President Donald Trump expressed intense disapproval following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that he lacks the authority to impose tariffs on imports unilaterally. He criticized the justices individually and pledged to utilize other legislation to continue his international trade strategies.

The Supreme Court’s significant 6-3 decision on Friday disrupted the influence Trump and his trade representatives previously exerted over both allied and adversarial nations during negotiations aimed at altering diplomatic ties and global market dynamics.

This ruling cast doubt on numerous trade agreements brokered by his team recently, which were negotiated under the looming threat of steep tariffs.

The decision also propelled all three major U.S. stock indexes to their highest points in weeks. It further raised questions about the future of the $175 billion Trump accumulated from U.S. importers due to what the court identified as a misinterpretation of the law.

“I’m deeply disappointed in certain court members, utterly disappointed for failing to do what’s best for our nation,” Trump declared to reporters at the White House, asserting that foreign nations were celebrating the verdict and “rejoicing openly.”

He suggested, without offering proof, that corruption influenced the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts: “Their actions are very unpatriotic and betray our Constitution. I believe the court has been influenced by foreign interests and a political agenda far less significant than anyone could imagine.”

Since returning to the White House 13 months ago, Trump has said he had what the court summarised as the “extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope.”

Citing a national emergency, he said the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) meant he could set tariffs at any rate he chose.

The court’s ruling was blunt: Trump has not proved that the president has this power, and exceeded his authority. A tariff levied on US importers is a tax ‌like any other, the court said, and the Constitution reserves the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” to Congress.

In response, an angry Trump said he would invoke other laws to collect tariffs, and announced a blanket 10 per cent tariff on imports from all other countries, on top of any existing non-IEEPA tariff.

Donald Trump, with a stern expression on his face.
Donald Trump accused Supreme Court judges of being “swayed by foreign interests”. Source: AAP / ABACAPRESS.COM / Sipa USA / Yuri Gripas

In doing so, he became the first president to invoke Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, in which Congress said the president could levy tariffs of up to 15 per cent for up to 150 days to fix “fundamental ⁠international payments problems”.


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Developer Announces Plans for Trump’s Tower on Gold Coast, Set to Become Australia’s Tallest Building

In brief A property developer says he has signed a deal with…

BAFTAs Controversy: Understanding Tourette Syndrome and the Public’s Reaction

In Brief John Davidson says he’s “deeply mortified” after shouting an “involuntary…
Major Aussie tourist destination battered by torrential rain, flash flooding

Significant Australian Tourist Hub Faces Severe Weather with Torrential Rain and Flash Flooding

Residents have been evacuated and holidaymakers are on edge after a torrential…

Iran Vows Intense Retaliation Amid Escalating US Tensions and Nationwide Student Protests

In brief Videos of protests in Iran show students chanting and burning…
blood moon

Catch the Rare Blood Moon: Essential Viewing Tips for This Celestial Event

There’s a rare blood moon on the horizon the likes of which…
Sydney to Newcastle high-speed rail to be 'shovel-ready' in two years

High-Speed Rail Link Between Sydney and Newcastle Set to Reach ‘Shovel-Ready’ Status in Two Years

The federal government has poured another $230 billion into planning for a…
Life bans imposed over wild brawl at OzTag championships

Lifetime Bans Issued Following Intense Altercation at OzTag Championships

In an unprecedented decision, a father and son have been permanently banned…

Authorities Intensify Search for Abducted Grandfather Chris Baghsarian in Rural Areas

IN BRIEF 85-year-old grandfather Chris Baghsarian was kidnapped from his home more…
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has downplayed concerns about AI's energy cost, arguing it takes a lot of energy to train a human too.

OpenAI CEO Defends AI Training’s Energy Consumption: Equates to Human Development Costs

OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, has addressed concerns about the energy consumption of…
'BUYER BEWARE': Trump's new tariff threat after court smackdown

Trump Responds to Court Setback with New Tariff Warning

US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose bigger tariffs on countries…
Dr Simon Gordon

Renowned Surgeon Faces Allegations of Unwarranted Endometriosis Procedures

A prominent Melbourne surgeon is under investigation over allegations he performed unnecessary…
New Zealand's Prime Minister has said he will back any plans to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the line of royal succession. It comes as British ministers are understood to be considering legislation to remove Andrew from the line of succession once a police investigation has concluded. Christopher Luxon's announcement that he would support removing the shamed former prince came after Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese vowed to do the same. A spokesperson for Mr Luxon, New Zealand's premier, said: 'If the UK Government proposes to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor from the order of succession, New Zealand would support it. The UK Government has said any proposals would come after the police investigation concludes.'

New Zealand Approves Historic Move: Prince Andrew Removed from Royal Line of Succession

New Zealand’s Prime Minister has expressed his willingness to endorse any initiative…