Google’s cute Gemini ad is mostly honest about lying to your kid
Share this @internewscast.com

Many parents know the unwritten rule: when your child becomes attached to a particular stuffed animal, it’s wise to purchase a backup in case the beloved toy gets misplaced. Despite hearing this advice repeatedly, I neglected to buy a second plush deer after my son showed a clear fondness for “Buddy.” It seems I’m not alone, as demonstrated by the parents featured in Google’s latest advertisement for Gemini.

The ad narrates a charming and relatable fictional tale of a couple who realize their child’s favorite stuffed toy, a lamb named Mr. Fuzzy, was accidentally left on a plane. Desperate to replace it, they turn to Gemini, only to discover the toy is backordered. In a creative twist, they use Gemini to fabricate visuals of Mr. Fuzzy on a global escapade—posing with a beret near the Eiffel Tower, dodging bulls in Pamplona, and more—to entertain their child until the replacement arrives. These playful images also include a video message from Mr. Fuzzy, promising his return in five to eight business days. Depending on your perspective, this approach is either endearing or slightly unusual. But does Gemini really have the capability to pull this off? There’s only one way to find out.

Putting Gemini to the test, I uploaded three photos of Buddy, our very own version of Mr. Fuzzy, from various angles, and asked it to “find this stuffed animal to buy ASAP,” echoing the ad’s prompt. Gemini returned some potential matches, but upon reviewing its process, I discovered an elaborate eighteen hundred word essay chronicling its search. It pondered whether Buddy was a dog, a bunny, or something else entirely, featuring amusing lines like “I am considering the puppy hypothesis,” “The tag is a loop on the butt,” and “I’m now back in the rabbit hole!” Ultimately, Gemini concluded that Buddy might be a discontinued toy from Target and suggested checking eBay for availability.

To be fair, identifying Buddy is a bit of a challenge. His appearance suits the generic “cute woodland creature” category, his original care tag is long gone, and even we’re uncertain who gifted him to us. However, he is unmistakably a creation of Mary Meyer, as indicated by the loop on his rear. He appears to belong to the “Putty” collection, a possibility Gemini explored multiple times, and is likely a fawn model that was discontinued around 2021. I reached this conclusion independently after a quick 20-minute online search, without any AI assistance. Interestingly, when I used a reverse image search on one of Buddy’s photos, the AI confidently misidentified him as a puppy.

‘I am considering the puppy hypothesis’

In fairness, Buddy is a little bit hard to read. His features lean generic cute woodland creature, his care tag has long since been discarded, and we’re not even 100 percent sure who gave him to us. He is, however, definitely made by Mary Meyer, per the loop on his butt. He does seem to be from the “Putty” collection, which is a path Gemini went down a couple of times, and is probably a fawn that was discontinued sometime around 2021. That’s the conclusion I came to on my own, after about 20 minutes of Googling and no help from AI. The AI blurb when I do a reverse image search on one of my photos confidently declares him to be a puppy.

Gemini did a better job with the second half of the assignment, but it wasn’t quite as easy as the ad makes it look. I started with a different photo of Buddy — one where he’s actually on a plane in my son’s arms — and gave it the next prompt: “make a photo of the deer on his next flight.” The result is pretty good, but his lower half is obscured in the source image so the feet aren’t quite right. Close enough, though.

The ad doesn’t show the full prompt for the next two photos, so I went with: “Now make a photo of the same deer in front of the Grand Canyon.” And it did just that — with the airplane seatbelt and headphones, too. I was more specific with my next prompt, added a camera in his hands, and got something more convincing.

Looks plausible enough.
Image: Gemini / The Verge

Safety first, Buddy.
Image: Gemini / The Verge

I can see how Gemini misinterpreted my prompt. I was trying to keep it simple, and requested a photo of the same deer “at a family reunion.” I did not specify his family reunion. So that’s how he ended up crashing the Johnson family reunion — a gathering of humans. I can only assume that Gemini took my last name as a starting point here because it sure wasn’t in my prompt, and when I requested that Gemini created a new family reunion scene of his family, it just swapped the people for stuffed deer. There are even little placards on the table that say “deer reunion.” Reader, I screamed.

<em>I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this family in a pharmaceutical commercial before.</em>
<em>Oh deer.</em>

1/2

I’m pretty sure I’ve seen this family in a pharmaceutical commercial before.
Image: Gemini / The Verge

For the last portion of the ad, the couple use Gemini to create cute little videos of Mr. Fuzzy getting increasingly adventurous: snowboarding, white water rafting, skydiving, before finally appearing in a spacesuit on the moon addressing “Emma” directly. The commercial whips through all these clips quickly, which feels like a little sleight of hand given that Gemini takes at least a couple of minutes to create a video. And even on my Gemini Pro account, I’m limited to three generated videos per day. It would take a few days to get all of those clips right.

Gemini wouldn’t make a video based on any image of my kid holding the stuffed deer, probably thanks to some welcome guardrails preventing it from generating deepfakes of babies. I started with the only photo I had on hand of Buddy on his own: hanging upside down, air-drying after a trip through the washer. And that’s how he appears in the first clip it generated from this prompt: Temu Buddy hanging upside down in space before dropping into place, morphing into a right-side-up astronaut, and delivering the dialogue I requested.

A second prompt with a clear photo of Buddy right-side-up seemed to mash up elements of the previous video with the new one, so I started a brand new chat to see if I could get it working from scratch. Honestly? Nailed it. Aside from the antlers, which Gemini keeps sneaking in. But this clip also brought one nagging question to the forefront: should you do any of this when your kid loses a beloved toy?

I gave Buddy the same dialogue as in the commercial, using my son’s name rather than Emma. Hearing that same manufactured voice say my kid’s name out loud set alarm bells off in my head. An AI generated Buddy in front of the Eiffel Tower? Sorta weird, sorta cute. AI Buddy addressing my son by name? Nope, absolutely not, no thank you.

How much, and when, to lie to your kids is a philosophical debate you have with yourself over and over as a parent. Do you swap in the identical stuffie you had in a closet when the original goes missing and pretend it’s all the same? Do you tell them the truth and take it as an opportunity to learn about grief? Do you just need to buy yourself a little extra time before you have that conversation, and enlist AI to help you make a believable case? I wouldn’t blame any parent choosing any of the above. But personally, I draw the line at an AI character talking directly to my kid. I never showed him these AI-generated versions of Buddy, and I plan to keep it that way.

Nope, absolutely not, no thank you.

But back to the less morally complex question: can Gemini actually do all of the things that it does in the commercial? More or less. But there’s an awful lot of careful prompting and re-prompting you’d have to do to get those results. It’s telling that throughout most of the ad you don’t see the full prompt that’s supposedly generating the results on screen. A lot depends on your source material, too. Gemini wouldn’t produce any kind of video based on an image in which my kid was holding Buddy — for good reason! But this does mean that if you don’t have the right kind of photo on hand, you’re going to have a very hard time generating believable videos of Mr. Sniffles or whoever hitting the ski slopes.

Like many other elder millennials, I think about Calvin and Hobbes a lot. Bill Watterson famously refused to commercialize his characters, because he wanted to keep them alive in our imaginations rather than on a screen. He insisted that having an actor give Hobbes a voice would change the relationship between the reader and the character, and I think he’s right. The bond between a kid and a stuffed animal is real and kinda magical; whoever Buddy is in my kid’s imagination, I don’t want AI overwriting that.

The great cruelty of it all is knowing that there’s an expiration date on that relationship. When I became a parent, I wasn’t at all prepared for the way my toddler nuzzling his stuffed deer would crack my heart right open. It’s so pure and sweet, but it always makes me a little sad at the same time, knowing that the days where he looks for comfort from a stuffed animal like Buddy are numbered. He’s going to outgrow it all, and I’m not prepared for that reality. Maybe as much as we’re trying to save our kids some heartbreak over their lost companion, we’re really trying to delay ours, too.

All images and videos in this story were generated by Google Gemini.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.


Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Unveiling Surprises: Pluribus Finale Reveals Hidden Depths

With the announcement of a second season already confirmed, fans of the…

Hollywood Embraces AI by 2025, But Struggles to Deliver Results

Artificial intelligence has been a part of Hollywood for some time, but…