Internewscast Journal
  • Home
  • US News
  • Local News
  • Health
  • People
  • Guest Post
  • Support Our Cause
Internewscast Journal
  • Home
  • US News
  • Local News
  • Health
  • People
  • Guest Post
  • Support Our Cause
Home Local news From Debate to Conversation: ‘Ethics Bowl’ Provides Students a Softer Choice in a Divisive Time
  • Local news

From Debate to Conversation: ‘Ethics Bowl’ Provides Students a Softer Choice in a Divisive Time

    From debate to dialogue: In a contentious era, 'Ethics Bowl' offers students a gentler alternative
    Up next
    FHP: St. Augustine man killed, 4 injured in multi-vehicle crash on US-1
    Multi-Vehicle Crash on US-1 Claims Life of St. Augustine Man; Four Others Injured
    Published on 05 May 2025
    Author
    Internewscast
    Tags
    • 039Ethics,
    • Alex Richardson,
    • alternative,
    • Bowl039,
    • brian thompson,
    • contentious,
    • debate,
    • dialogue,
    • Education,
    • era,
    • from,
    • gentler,
    • Katherine Thomas,
    • Lifestyle,
    • Lizzie Lyman,
    • Mae Bradford,
    • offers,
    • Rhiannon Boyd,
    • Robert Ladenson,
    • students,
    • Taylor Swift,
    • U.S. news
    Share this @internewscast.com
    FacebookXRedditPinterest

    CHAPEL HILL, N.C. – A contrast:

    During the National Speech and Debate Tournament, two high school students face off on stage. The first student supports the assigned topic, arguing in favor of the right to secede from a government, and presents reasons why this stance is justified. The opposing student takes the stage to methodically refute and dismantle her opponent’s arguments.

    A year later and 800 miles away, two teams of high school students gather at the University of North Carolina to participate in the National High School Ethics Bowl finals. The moderator poses a question regarding the limits of discourse, asking how to balance the value and harm of critical commentary on a public figure’s life after they pass away.

    Teams are not given specific stances to defend. One team shares their thoughts, while the other asks probing questions to deepen everyone’s understanding of the issue. Here, no one engages in attacking the other side.

    Many a young debater may learn the rhetorical skills to become a successful lawyer or politician, subduing an opponent through wit and wordplay. But are they learning skills that will make them better citizens of an increasingly complex and contentious republic?

    In an age when many Americans are wondering whether it is still possible to have a principled, respectful disagreement over important issues, proponents of Ethics Bowl say it points the way.

    Discussion replaces contentiousness

    Ethics Bowl may resemble debate. After all, it’s two teams discussing a controversial or difficult topic. But they are very different.

    In Ethics Bowl, teams aren’t assigned a specific position on an issue that they have to defend regardless of their beliefs. Instead, members are given cases to discuss and make their own decisions about what they consider the best position. Teams can, and often do, come to similar conclusions. It is — and this is important — OK for them to agree. Scoring is based on how deeply they explore the issues, including other viewpoints.

    Robert Ladenson, who developed the Ethics Bowl as a college philosophy classroom exercise back in 1993 and went on to lead the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl for decades, explains what he considers an ethical understanding of an issue in an oral history for the University of Illinois in 2023.

    It means “having some capacity to view, from the inside, the ethical outlooks of people who disagree with you. That means not simply being aware of what they’ve said or what they’ve written, or being able to develop a nifty debaters’ responses to the viewpoints they hold — but really looking inside the other view and trying to understand it from the other person’s way of looking at the world.”

    It’s a reach for understanding and common ground

    That plays out at Ethics Bowl. Take the case “See Spot Clone,” about whether it is ever ethical to clone a beloved pet.

    Harpeth Hall from Nashville starts the discussion with six minutes to present their thoughts. There are millions of homeless pets, so the ethical choice is to adopt, they believe. Cloning is self-serving for the human. The pet cannot consent to being cloned. Also, cloning may involve unknown health issues for the cloned pet, as in the renowned case of Dolly the sheep. The team also believes that death is a part of life, and it is important for people to confront death.

    Now it is the turn of team B, Miami’s Archimedean Upper Conservatory — not to attack and refute, but to ask questions that expand the discussion. What about pet breeders? Where do they fit on the ethical continuum? Also, what’s so wrong with cloning a pet for your own happiness? Are all selfish pursuits bad?

    Team A responds that breeding is better than cloning but worse than adopting a stray. They point out that a cloned pet will not have the same personality, and that could bring the owner pain instead of comfort.

    Next the judges ask questions. What if there were no possible health problems for the cloned animal? What if the animal is not cloned to comfort an owner but for a more noble purpose? Would it be ethical to clone a skilled search-and-rescue dog?

    Cloning is still a threat to the “natural cycle of life,” Team A contends. And there is no guarantee that the temperament and personality that make an excellent service animal would be retained in a clone.

    Once the round is complete, the moderator introduces a new case.

    Easy answers are avoided

    In a society awash in shortcuts and simple solutions, simply setting the ground rules for contentious conversations can be a high hill to climb. At the Ethics Bowl, though, it’s part of the point: The process of conversation is as important as the outcome. And subtlety matters.

    A good Ethics Bowl case is one where “two well-meaning individuals can take in all of the same facts and information and come to diametrically opposite, value-driven answers,” says Alex Richardson, who directed the National Bowl for five years.

    The cases students grapple with include real-life scenarios pulled from the headlines, like the less-than-respectful response to the murder of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson. There are also more philosophical issues, like whether humans should pursue immortality. And there are dilemmas that teenagers deal with every day, like whether not posting on Instagram about a hate crime in your community makes you complicit.

    That last case was a difficult one for the team from Harpeth Hall, they say, but it helped them clarify some of their thoughts around social media.

    “We came to the conclusion that no one is obligated to share information,” says Katherine Thomas. “But then there was a difference like when you’re talking about Taylor Swift, when she actually could register 500,000 people to vote but she decides not to. Is she actually complicit in that? She has the actual power to make change, where I don’t, really, with my 200 followers.”

    Another case considered whether to confront an uncle who makes sexist remarks at the dinner table. Discussing the issue with her Harpeth Hall teammates helped Thalia Vidalakis think through when it might be good to speak up and when “it’s good to just be there for your family and recognize that there’s going to be differences.”

    It unfolds in a low-key way

    A group of teenagers sits at a table with sticker-covered water bottles and the occasional Red Bull. They are allowed only pens and blank paper, no previous notes, but their backpacks litter the room. Their opponents sit at a neighboring table. In between is a moderator. Facing them are three judges pulled from the UNC philosophy department, Ethics Bowl leaders from other states, even the community at large. There is no dress code, so the teens come in whatever they consider nice clothes.

    The teams have been discussing a group of cases for weeks, but they don’t know which they’ll be asked about. Once the question is read, they are given a few minutes to discuss. That’s when one or two of the teammates generally scurry around the table to huddle. Intense whispering and furious scribbling ensue.

    It’s clearly a contest. There is a winning team and a trophy. But students say it is not competitive in a traditional sense.

    “We’re all sad that it has to end. But I agree that it’s not about beating people,” says Lizzie Lyman, whose first-year team from Midtown High School in Atlanta lost in the semifinals of the national championship. “When it becomes about winning and beating the other team, it gets hostile and … just unsavory. When it’s about constructively answering a question and just having a really interesting, engaging conversation, that’s where you get to have all these amazing conversations.”

    Competitiveness isn’t only beside the point. It can even be counterproductive in achieving the desired goal. That’s how Mae Bradford of the winning team BASIS Flagstaff from Arizona sees it. Her assessment: “Something that’s rare and unique about Ethics Bowl is that those who don’t focus on winning and instead focus on truth and respect and getting to the moral heart of the issue will win.”

    Changing minds, one kid at a time

    Part of the point of the Ethics Bowl is to create well-rounded students who ingest other viewpoints and engage without arguing. A 2022 survey of participants in nationals found that 100% believed that their critical thinking skills had improved. A large majority said their ethical or political beliefs had changed.

    There is clearly a thirst for a different kind of competition. The National High School Ethics Bowl is only 12 years old, and this year saw 550 teams competing in regional bowls around the country.

    Sona Zarkou, also on the BASIS Flagstaff team, sees herself as a case study in Ethics Bowl benefits. When she practiced debate, she says, she was “kind of a jerk” — “very quick to attack and very rude” about opposing views. In Ethics Bowl she sees herself “turn the discussion to something a lot more respectful, a lot more truth-oriented.”

    Rhiannon Boyd, a judge at this year’s competition as well as a high school teacher and coach and the organizer of the Virginia High School Ethics Bowl, has seen the positive changes as well. Two of her students last year were on opposite ends of the political spectrum. Their disagreement was great. Could they be on the same team together? In the end, both joined and made it all the way to nationals.

    Their differing opinions remain. But now, Boyd says, they are “really good friends.”

    “They can see each other’s strengths because they were sitting side by side at nationals in a huddle trying to build off of each other’s ideas,” she says. “They could see that leveraging those differences was actually the thing that made them strong.”

    Ethics Bowl: Lesson learned. ___

    AP National Writer Allen G. Breed contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

    Share this @internewscast.com
    FacebookXRedditPinterest
    You May Also Like
    2 pedestrians killed in separate crashes on Hwy 21
    • Local news

    Two Pedestrians Die in Different Accidents on Highway 21

    BEAUFORT COUNTY, S.C. () Two crashes in Beaufort County this weekend left…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Bluffton resident earns second PGA Tour win
    • Local news

    Bluffton Local Clinches Second Victory on PGA Tour

    SILVIS, Ill. () — A Bluffton resident picked up his second PGA…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    More Rain on the Way for Texas Amid Historic Flooding
    • Local news

    Texas to Experience Additional Rainfall as Historic Flooding Continues

    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Texas flooding victims: What we know about those who lost their lives
    • Local news

    Texas Flood Tragedy: Key Information on Lives Lost

    () The Fourth of July weekend flash flooding on the Guadalupe River…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Kingsport mayor declares July 6th as Van Dobbins Jr. Day
    • Local news

    Mayor of Kingsport Designates July 6th as Van Dobbins Jr. Day

    KINGSPORT, Tenn. (WJHL) — Help Our Potential Evolve (HOPE) joined forces with…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Urbana Park District issues warning after ticks reported in parks
    • Local news

    Urbana Park District Alerts Public to Tick Sightings in Local Parks

    URBANA, Ill. (WCIA) — The Urbana Park District is warning community members…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Historic LA restaurant to shutter after 117 years
    • Local news
    Cole’s French Dip, one of the original purveyors of the French dip…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Champaign Co. Crime Stoppers looking for tips on car burglar
    • Local news

    Champaign Co. Crime Stoppers Seeks Information on Car Burglary Suspect

    CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (WCIA) — Champaign County Crime Stoppers is asking for help…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Jimmy Hoffa mystery potentially solved fifty years later: Detroit reporter
    • Local news

    Detroit Reporter Claims to Have Cracked the Jimmy Hoffa Case After 50 Years

    Teamsters Union president Jimmy Hoffa is seen in Washington on July 26,…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025

    Reflecting on the Rolling Stones’ Notorious Arkansas Arrest 50 Years Later

    FORDYCE, Ark. (KARK) – Among the fascinating stories archived in the Encyclopedia…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Chuck's Arcade
    • Local news

    Chuck E. Cheese Launches Adult-Friendly Arcades in 8 States

    (NEXSTAR) – Too old to throw your next birthday party at a…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    GBI investigating shooting in Glennville, one dead
    • Local news

    The Georgia Bureau of Investigation Probes Fatal Glennville Shooting

    GLENNVILLE, Ga. () — The Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) is investigating…
    • Internewscast
    • July 7, 2025
    Footage released after Orange County deputies fatally shoot armed man
    • Local news

    Video Released Following Fatal Shooting of Armed Man by Orange County Deputies

    ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. – Following a fatal deputy-involved shooting that occurred last…
    • Internewscast
    • July 8, 2025

    Jessica Files Restraining Order Against Her Mother, But Now She’s Having Doubts

    If you find yourself spending more time arguing with a family member…
    • Internewscast
    • July 8, 2025
    Two people wearing masks greet each other at a doorway.
    • US
    THIS is the chilling moment murderer Erin Patterson discharges herself from hospital…
    • Internewscast
    • July 8, 2025
    Here Are the Traits OpenAI Executives Look For in New Hires
    • Business

    These Are the Qualities That OpenAI Leaders Seek in New Employees

    What kinds of skills do OpenAI leaders look for in new hires?…
    • Internewscast
    • July 8, 2025
    Internewscast Journal
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • DMCA Notice
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Guest Post
    • Support Our Cause
    Copyright 2023. All Right Reserverd.