Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Cruise Passengers May Face Higher Parking Fees to Counter Port Canaveral Tariffs

PORT CANAVERAL, Fla. – What cruise passengers pay to park at Port…

Trump Strategizes to Harness Presidential Influence for 2026 Midterm Advantage

Recently, President Donald Trump has shown a strong willingness to use the…

Court Orders Trump to Ensure Humane Treatment of Children in ICE Detention

SAN DIEGO (Border Report) — In what migrant advocates are calling “a…

Numerous Meetings Held on Russia’s Ukraine Conflict, Yet Peace Faces Significant Hurdles

The recent Oval Office meeting, marking the second such gathering in six…

SEC Team Attempts to Lay Claim to USC’s 2004 National Championship

The 2004 National Championship vacated by the USC Trojans is being claimed…

Over 450 Detained Following DC Control, According to White House Representative

() More than 450 people have been arrested since the Trump administration’s…

Southwest Braces for Intense Heat Wave with Temperatures Surpassing 110 Degrees

The Southwest is bracing for intense heat as a looming wave of…

The Menendez Brothers’ Attorney Discusses Anticipations for Upcoming Parole Hearings

() In a matter of days, the Menendez brothers are set to…

This Conversation is Recorded: Trump’s Hot Mic Incident Joins Long List of Global Moments

LONDON (AP) Behold the power of the humble hot mic. The magnifier…

California Governor Newsom Criticizes Trump Over Redistricting Dispute

() California Gov. Gavin Newsom is punching back at President Trump’s redistricting…

“DHS Introduces ‘Cornhusker Clink’ as the Name for New Nebraska Detention Facility”

EL PASO, Texas (Border Report) — The Department of Homeland Security is…

Teenager Fatally Shot Overnight in Springfield; Two Others Injured

SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) — A teenager was killed and two other people…