Texas bill targets abortion pills, $100K penalty for distributors
Share this @internewscast.com


DALLAS () Texas Republicans are pushing a new bill targeting abortion pills they say would be nearly impossible to overturn.

Senate Bill 2880, which passed in the Senate last week, allows individuals to sue anyone who manufactures, distributes, mails, prescribes or provides abortion-inducing drugs, with potential penalties of up to $100,000. It also expands the state’s wrongful death statute.

Supporters of the legislation say it’s intended to stop the largely unregulated influx of abortion pills into Texas since the state banned abortion. But critics argue the bill’s shield from legal challenges is unconstitutional and warn it could establish a troubling precedent extending well beyond abortion rights.

“This is a flagrant, brazen transgression of the principles of the separation of powers on which this country and state were founded,” said state Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas.

Republicans see it differently. “No, sir. We make the rules, we set the jurisdiction,” said state Sen. Bryan Hughes, R-Mineola.

Abortion pills bill sparks debate on constitutionality

The debate over jurisdiction is precisely where the bill becomes more controversial.

Most notably, the bill says state judges would have no jurisdiction to rule on the constitutionality of the law. If a judge does attempt to weigh in, they could be personally sued for the same $100,000.

In essence, by ruling on the law, the judge would waive his or her governmental immunity.

Some attorneys find it baffling to pass legislation that could be unconstitutional and then make it difficult for the courts to declare it so.

“It’s shocking on all levels,” said legal analyst Mercedes Colwin. “There are three branches of government, and basically, what the legislators are saying is that the judicial branch of government is nonexistent, with respect to this law.”

Attorneys say such a move could set a dangerous precedent. It also raises questions about whether other states would recognize such a law.

Several Democratic states have shield laws in place to protect against such repercussions.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Foster Family’s Concerns About Father Prove Accurate; He Now Faces Jail Time

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – A foster family warned the courts not…

Amid Conflict in Sudan, People Resort to Eating Weeds and Plants to Survive

CAIRO – As Sudan battles a devastating war and millions endure severe…

Fossil Misclassification Leads to Discovery of New Dog-Sized Dinosaur

() A new species of dinosaur the size of a Labrador retriever…

The Trump Administration Considers $30 Billion Nuclear Agreement with Iran

In recent days, the Trump administration has examined potential economic incentives for…

US-China Trade Agreement Eases Concerns at Los Angeles Port

LOS ANGELES () The U.S. and China have signed an agreement on…

Petitioners Rush to Gather Signatures Before New Ballot Measure Rules Take Effect

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) – A controversial new law making it tougher for…

Celebrating 150 Years: St. Joseph’s Hospital’s Legacy in Savannah

SAVANNAH, Ga. () — St. Joseph’s Hospital celebrated a major milestone Friday…

Supreme Court Confirms Texas Law on Age Verification for Online Pornography

() The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law requiring pornographic websites…

Congress Weighs Implementing Caps on Federal Student Loan Borrowing

(NewsNation) — Congress continues to negotiate the specifics of President Trump’s ambitious…

U.S. Inflicted Significant Harm on Iran’s Nuclear Facilities: Iranian Foreign Minister

() U.S. strikes caused significant, “serious damage” to nuclear sites in Iran,…

A Local from Evans Aids in Donating Jerseys to Ronald McDonald House

AUGUSTA, Ga. () – A recent University of Florida graduate came up…

Supreme Court Decision Doesn’t Favor Either Party: Insights from Chris Sununu

() Despite some crowning Friday’s Supreme Court ruling as a victory for President…