Judge blocks Trump’s election executive order, siding with Democrats who called it overreach

Court Halts Trump's Election Executive Order, Agreeing with Democrats on Overreach Claims

ATLANTA – A federal judge has halted President Donald Trump’s plans to revamp U.S. elections. This decision favored a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general who argued that the move was unconstitutional.

The executive order, issued by Trump on March 25, aimed to enforce several changes, such as demanding documentary proof of citizenship from all who register to vote in federal elections, allowing only mail-in ballots arriving by Election Day, and tying federal election grant money to states complying with the new ballot timeframe.

The attorneys general contended that the order “oversteps the States’ constitutional authority and attempts to change election law unilaterally.” In response, the White House has justified the order as a measure to ensure “free, fair, and honest elections,” describing the citizenship proof as a “commonsense” stipulation.


You May Also Like

Indiana Man Seeks Teen Killings Retrial Over Ritual Evidence

A man sentenced to 130 years for the Indiana murders of two…

Chile’s Beloved Hot Dogs Feel the Bite of Economic Strain

SANTIAGO – Around lunchtime in central Santiago, dozens of restaurants and food…

Storms Kick Off the Workweek Before a Cold Front Arrives

High chance for rain lingers early this week before a late-week cold…

La Bola Negra Wins TIFF People’s Choice Award on Oscar Path

“La Bola Negra,” a sweeping Spanish-language queer drama following the connected stories…