As the dust begins to settle from the recent U.S. assault on Iran’s nuclear installations, experts suggest that forthcoming decisions will be crucial in determining if Iran’s nuclear goals have been effectively thwarted.

In response to the operation, President Donald Trump stated on Truth Social: “The extent of damage to Iran’s Nuclear sites is reportedly vast. Our strikes were precise and impactful. Our military demonstrated exceptional ability. Thank you!”

On Sunday, Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, informed reporters that while it will take time for a full damage assessment, preliminary evaluations show that all three targeted sites suffered heavy damage and destruction. He further noted that it is too soon to speculate “on what might still be intact.”

A senior Israeli security source told Fox News Digital, “It’s still too soon to know for sure, but it appears the sites were seriously damaged — it looks excellent.”

Mark Dubowitz, CEO of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), told Fox News Digital that all remaining Iranian nuclear facilities must be completely dismantled and referred to FDD expert’s plan, which outlined a strategy for the permanent dismantlement of Tehran’s nuclear weapons enterprise. 

The report calls for the destruction of all enrichment sites, the removal or seizure of enriched uranium, the dismantling of advanced centrifuges, and a permanent halt to weaponization efforts. It also demands unrestricted inspections, irreversible disarmament, and strict enforcement through snapback sanctions. FDD argues that anything less would leave Iran capable of rebuilding its nuclear program.

Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence and president of the Mind Israel think tank, called the American strike a “game-changer.”

“Trump’s doctrine of ‘peace through strength’ is in action,” Yadlin said. “Geopolitically, this changes the entire war — and sends a message to China, Russia, and others.”

But Yadlin also believes Iran’s nuclear capabilities haven’t been wiped out completely. “There are two possible Iranian responses: retaliation and changing nuclear policy. Retaliation may come via terror attacks in the Gulf, or pressure through proxies like Hezbollah or the Houthis. But I think the more likely shift is in nuclear posture — perhaps withdrawing from the NPT.”

“They’re in a dilemma,” Shein told Fox News Digital. “They don’t want to drag the U.S. further into military conflict, and they can’t risk harming ties with Gulf neighbors. A military retaliation — like closing the Strait of Hormuz — would invite overwhelming force. Expelling inspectors or quitting the NPT [Non-Proliferation Treaty] may be their next moves.”

Kuperwasser added that military pressure alone may not bring lasting resolution — unless paired with either a diplomatic agreement with intrusive inspections, or a credible threat of continued strikes.

“If there’s an agreement, it must be based on verification — not trust,” he said. “Anywhere, anytime inspections. But if they refuse, we can continue striking any new facility they build.”

As Israel and the U.S. prepare for potential cycles of response and counter-response, Kuperwasser believes the Israeli public is ready.

“These are historic times,” he said. “We understand the sacrifice — and we’re ready to see it through.”