Judge rejects Jan. 6 defendant's restitution and fine refund
Share this @internewscast.com

Background: Hector Vargos Santos (Justice Department). Left inset: Donald Trump speaking at the annual Road to Majority conference in Washington, DC, in June 2024 (Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP). Right inset: A selfie that Hector Vargas Santos allegedly took inside the U.S. Capitol during the January 6 Capitol attack (DOJ).

A former U.S. Marine and pardoned January 6 defendant, who attempted to reclaim the fines and restitution he paid following his conviction for involvement in the Capitol riot, faced rejection on Friday by a federal judge. The judge clarified that a pardon doesn’t void a person’s conviction or monetary penalties, thus no refunds are due.

“As the Supreme Court clarified in Knote, once a conviction has been ‘established by judicial proceedings,’ any penalties imposed are ‘presumed to have been rightfully done and justly suffered,’ despite the defendant later receiving a pardon,” wrote U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss in a nine-page order concerning Hector Vargas Santos, 29, from Jersey City, New Jersey.

Trump’s mass pardon of Jan. 6 rioters recognized Santos as one of more than 1,500 defendants who were granted clemency after the president took office for a second time in January.

In his order Friday, Moss cited the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Knote v. United States, which described a pardon as “an act of grace” that does not restore “rights or property once vested in others in consequence of the conviction and judgment,” per the 1877 ruling. “Because Santos’ payments were collected while his convictions were ‘in force,’ id., the funds were not ‘erroneously collected’ and are therefore not refundable,” said Moss, a Barack Obama appointee.

Santos was convicted in 2023 of four misdemeanors after he “forced his way into the Capitol building and Rotunda with a crowd of rioters,” according to Moss. “Santos was one of thousands who descended upon the Capitol that day, but he was one of the first individuals to breach the restricted Capitol grounds,” the judge said. “Santos and his fellow rioters caused substantial physical damage to the Capitol, requiring the expenditure of more than $2.8 million for repairs.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

As a result, Santos was ordered to pay a $70 mandatory special assessment, $500 in restitution to the Architect of the Capitol and a $2,500 fine. He paid a total of $2,026.19 before being pardoned by President Donald Trump earlier this year, including $1,456.19 towards the $2,500 fine.

“In accordance with its usual protocol, the Finance Office for the District Court collected these funds and deposited them into the Crime Victims Restitution Fund within the United States Treasury,” Moss said Friday. “After the court dismissed his case, Vargas submitted a request to the Finance Office for a refund of his payments, but the Office responded that it was unable to issue a refund.”

Moss noted how the finance office also cited Knote v. United States in its official response, with Santos moving to try and get a refund of his payments soon after. The Justice Department came out in support of Santos’ request, filing a response of its own that said the Trump administration agrees that Vargas’s payments should be refunded.

Both the DOJ and Santos cited the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Nelson v. Colorado, which found that convictions vacated on appeal — Santos was pardoned in January while he had an appeal pending — are “entitled to a return of fines, fees, and restitution.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Authorities Issue Warnings Against Four ‘Finfluencers’ on TikTok for Financial Advice

Australia’s financial regulatory body is intensifying its scrutiny of social media “finfluencers”…

Exclusive: Ben Roberts-Smith’s International Business Ambitions Uncovered in Court Documents

Ben Roberts-Smith was eyeing business opportunities overseas before his arrest, but his…

Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Alito Clash in Uncommon Opinion Exchange

U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, Jr., Clarence Thomas and Brett…

Police Investigate Incident Involving Teacher and Nonverbal 9-Year-Old Student

Background: Selmer Elementary School in Selmer, Tennessee (Google Maps). Inset: Meg Day…

Shocking Lawsuit Alleges Human Finger Found in Trader Joe’s Orange Juice

The Trader Joe’s in Portland, Ore., where Julee O’Neil says she purchased…

Child Discovered on Roadway as Babysitter’s Troubling History Surfaces, Says District Attorney

Inset: Arissa Ward (Dauphin County Prison). Background: The Pennsylvania street where a…

Father Involved in Shooting Incident at School Pickup

Left inset: Noureddine Dib (KGW). Right inset: Michael Zakarneh (GoFundMe). Background: Surveillance…

Brave Teen Intervenes to Protect Family: Mother and Daughter Stabbed in Shocking Incident, Police Report

Background: The Thunder Over Louisville show on April 18, 2026 (WLKY/YouTube). Inset…

Shocking Social Security Fraud: Man Conceals Partner’s Corpse for Years to Cash In

Inset left James Agnew (Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office). Inset right James O’Neill…

Dispute Over Onion Rings at Steak ‘n’ Shake Escalates to Gunfire Incident

Background: News footage of the Steak ‘n’ Shake restaurant in Spanish Lake,…

Teens Arrested Following Machete Incident on Melbourne’s Popular Dining Strip

Three teenagers have been charged over an alleged machete attack that unfolded…

Newberry Man Faces Additional Charge After Detective Links March-Seized Pistol to Stolen Gun Report

By Staff NEWBERRY, Fla. – A 23-year-old man, Kobe Deon Delima, faces…