In a notable case this week, a district court judge reviewed legal proceedings concerning the Trump administration’s Justice Department and its inquiry into doctors providing “transgender care” surgeries and prescribing “gender-affirming” treatments to their patients.

Judges are expected to base their decisions on constitutional principles, yet it remains uncertain if this was adhered to on Monday at the U.S. District Court in Seattle, Western District of Washington. The court proceedings included remarks emphasizing the government’s overt intentions: “This isn’t conjecture about concealed agendas — it is the Administration’s clearly stated aim,” wrote Whitehead. “The Government is pursuing the ‘intended effect’ of its Executive Orders,” he added, referring to the subpoenas aimed at reducing or eliminating all gender-affirming care. “No clearer evidence of improper purpose could exist than the Government’s own repeated declarations that it seeks to end the very practice it claims to be merely investigating.”

U.S. District Judge Jamal Whitehead ruled that a wide-ranging subpoena the Justice Department served in June on QueerDoc, a medical practice offering gender-affirming care online, cannot be enforced because the demand was not part of a legitimate law enforcement investigation.

Whitehead, a Biden appointee, said it was apparent that the subpoena is intended to advance President Donald Trump’s goal of wiping out such care for people with gender dysphoria.

“This is not speculation about hidden motives — it is the Administration’s explicit agenda, The Government seeks the ‘intended effect’ of its Executive Orders,” Whitehead wrote, “and these subpoenas to ‘downsize or eliminate’ all gender-affirming care. No clearer evidence of improper purpose could exist than the Government’s own repeated declarations that it seeks to end the very practice it claims to be merely investigating.”