In an effort to manage young offenders on bail, electronic monitoring devices have been tested on individuals aged 15 to 18, yielding varied outcomes.

During a parliamentary session, youth advocates expressed strong criticism of the recently implemented legislation.

“For those aged 10 to 14, evidence suggests that electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) offer no benefit whatsoever,” remarked Katherine Hayes, CEO of the Youth Advocacy Centre.

Tom Allsop, CEO of PeakCare, added, “For 60% of these youths, their home environment is unsafe. Forcing them to remain in such conditions could be one of the most detrimental actions.”

Commissioner Natalie Lewis of the Queensland Family and Child Commission also voiced her disapproval.

“This approach infringes on children’s rights, disregards scientific insights into child development, and goes against established principles of effective youth justice,” Lewis stated.

Despite the backlash, the bill will pass when parliament resumes with the support of youth crime victims.

“The electronic monitoring devices is just another tool that is available to the courts,” Voice for Victims advocate Trudy Reading said.