A progressive district attorney in Texas has announced that no charges will be filed against the Austin police officers involved in the fatal shooting of a gunman responsible for killing three people and injuring 13 others during a suspected terror attack. This decision comes amid concerns that the officers might be brought before a grand jury.
Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza issued a statement following comments from Governor Greg Abbott, who noted that he would ultimately have the final say in the event of any charges or convictions against the officers.
“These officers are heroes,” Garza emphasized. “My office has no intention of pursuing charges, and any claims to the contrary are false. These falsehoods are being spread for political reasons.”
Criticism arose after reports suggested the possibility of the officers facing a grand jury. This scrutiny is linked to a 2021 policy mandating that all cases involving police shootings and serious use-of-force incidents be reviewed by a grand jury.
The Austin Police Department, along with the FBI, is currently investigating the shooting that occurred at Buford’s on West 6th Street in Austin, Texas, on March 1, 2026. (Photo credit: Stephanie Tacy/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Doug O’Connell, representing the officers through O’Connell West law firm at the request of the Austin Police Association, pointed out that the review process is in accordance with the policy established by Garza.
Garza, O’Connell said, demanded the policy at the direction of the Wren Collective, a progressive criminal justice reform nonprofit that backs liberal DAs and is mainly composed of former public defenders seeking to overhaul the American justice system.
“It’s my belief that the Wren Collective has directed the district attorney to review officer-involved cases this way,” O’Connell told Fox News Digital. “It seems they’re very anti-law enforcement officers.”
Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza speaks at a news conference. (Jay Janner / The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)
The Austin police officers shot and killed Ndiaga Diagne, a 53-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen born in Senegal, early Sunday after he opened fire at a bar, Buford’s Backyard Beer Garden, killing Savitha Shan, 21, Jorge Pederson, 30; and 19-year-old Ryder Harrington.
Fox News Digital has reached out to Garza’s office.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, Wren Collective founder Jessica Brand thanked the responding officers for their actions, which she credited for saving more lives.
Ndiaga Diagne, 53, shot and killed two people and injured 14 others, police said. He was wearing a shirt featuring an Iran flag. (Obtained by Fox News)
“Three people died in a mass shooting last week, more people were harmed, families are grieving, and the entire city is in mourning,” she said. “The officers did heroic work and stopped what could have been an even bigger tragedy. As an Austin resident, I thank them, and also those people providing support for the many victims and their loved ones now.”
O’Connell said Garza ran on a campaign of targeting police officers in an anti-police climate.
The DA instituted the review in 2021 amid calls for greater law enforcement accountability following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, which also sparked nationwide calls to defund police agencies.
In addition to worrying about violence directed at them, officers now have to worry about potential legal action, O’Connell said.
“Every time an officer is dispatched to a violent criminal call, they’ve got to be thinking: ‘I could be killed or depending on how this goes, I could be indicted,’” O’Connell said.
In a post on X, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott praised the officers while noting that Garza’s office isn’t the end-all should the officers involved be charged or convicted in court.
Austin police work at the scene of a shooting on West 6th Street on Sunday where three people were shot and killed before the gunman was killed by responding authorities. (Jay Janner/The Austin American-Statesman via Getty Images)
“These police officers are heroes who saved lives. Whatever the DA does, I will have the final say in the fate of these police officers,” he wrote on X.
Fox News Digital has reached out to Abbott’s office for clarity on his remarks.
Texas state Rep. Mitch Little, a Republican who formerly served as the impeachment attorney for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, told Fox News Digital there was no legal justification to have a grand jury for every single officer involved shooting.
“The only explanation for that is a leftist ideological bent on the part of the district attorney’s office,” he said.
Meanwhile, much of the criticism of the mandatory review stems from its lack of transparency, O’Connell said,
“Nothing about it is fair or balanced. The district attorney holds all the power when it comes to grand juries,” he said, noting that defense lawyers aren’t allowed to be present or present evidence.
“We know that grand juries have been manipulated because we’ve had to defend officers who have been indicted,” he added.
Members of the FBI and local law enforcement investigate outside of Buford’s bar in downtown on March 01, 2026 in Austin, Texas. Three people are dead and 14 others hospitalized following a mass shooting early Sunday morning. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
Michael Bullock, the president of the Austin Police Association, the union that represents rank-and-file officers, said he believed there was already “sufficient information” in the public sphere that shows that a grand jury isn’t necessary.
“There’s no need to subject these officers to that especially since it’s taking the DA over a year in almost every case to present these to the grand jury,” he wrote Tuesday on X. “That’s way too long and added stress for officers who have already been through a lot.”
Related Article
