On Monday, the United States initiated a naval blockade aimed at Iranian shipping, significantly heightening tensions in the Gulf region. This action followed the collapse of high-stakes discussions between Washington and Tehran in Pakistan earlier in the day.

President Donald Trump announced the blockade shortly after negotiations in Islamabad concluded without a resolution. Despite the lack of an agreement, the talks featured uncommon direct interaction between the two nations, according to those involved.

In a conversation with Fox News Digital, Lt. Gen. (ret.) Mohammed Saeed, who previously served as the chief of general staff for the Pakistan Army, expressed that the discussions were closer to reaching a consensus than they appeared. He believes there is still room for diplomatic solutions.

“Both parties indicated they were very near to an agreement, almost on the brink of a resolution,” Saeed explained, drawing from his insights and reports. Having retired in 2023, he continues to engage with strategic operations, security coordination, and delicate political situations.

“The dialogue was conducted in a notably amicable tone, with both sides showing willingness to accommodate and understand each other’s positions. This suggests that the potential to revive negotiations remains strong.”

The naval blockade targeting Iranian maritime activities officially commenced on April 13, 2026. (Farooq NAEEM / AFP via Getty Images)

Speaking at the White House Monday, Trump defended the blockade, saying, “Right now, there’s no fighting. Right now, we have a blockade … Iran is doing absolutely no business, and we’re going to keep it that way very easily.”

He added that Iran’s military capabilities had been significantly degraded, saying its “Navy has gone, their air force is gone, their anti-aircraft is gone, their radar is gone and their leaders are gone.”

Vice President JD Vance, who led the U.S. delegation, pressed Iran to accept a strict “zero enrichment” policy and remove its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. 

“The simple fact is that we need to see an affirmative commitment that they will not seek a nuclear weapon, and they will not seek the tools that would enable them to quickly achieve a nuclear weapon,” Vance said at a press conference in Islamabad.

Iranian leaders rejected those demands, insisting that any agreement must include the immediate release of billions of dollars in frozen assets.

Now, with the blockade in place, Saeed suggested the move may be designed less as a military endgame and more as leverage.

“This blockade could be … a maneuver to build further pressure on Iran to negotiate,” he said.

Vice President JD Vance speaks during a news conference after meeting with representatives from Pakistan and Iran in Islamabad, Pakistan, April 12, 2026. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)

The escalation has raised concerns globally, particularly for countries dependent on Gulf energy flows, including Pakistan.

“Everyone in the world must be worried about what kind of economic negative spin-offs such a blockade would have,” Saeed said.

Saeed, who until recently sat at the center of Pakistan’s military leadership, framed the Islamabad talks as a critical reopening of dialogue after decades of hostility.

“It is the first time in 47 years … that there was engagement at the highest level,” he said, calling it “a great moment for diplomacy” and a demonstration of Pakistan’s ability to maintain credibility with both Washington and Tehran.

He pointed in particular to Pakistan’s army chief, Asim Munir, a figure who has drawn unusual attention in Washington. 

Trump has publicly praised Munir, at one point calling him his “favorite field marshal,” elevating his profile as a key intermediary in regional diplomacy.

Munir, who rose through Pakistan’s intelligence ranks before becoming army chief, previously served as director general of military intelligence and later led the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). His career has been defined by deep involvement in regional security and intelligence coordination, including longstanding engagement with Iran.

Security personnel inspect vehicles entering the Foreign Ministry office in Islamabad on April 9, 2026. (Aamir QURESHI / AFP via Getty Images)

Those ties could prove critical in the current crisis, according to Saeed. 

“What people do not know is that when he was director general of military intelligence … he was interacting with Iranians at multiple levels continuously,” Saeed said, describing years of direct engagement with Iran’s military, intelligence and political leadership, including former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a U.S. strike during Trump’s first term.

“He has had interaction with them for a long time … visiting Iran frequently and interacting on multiple issues,” Saeed said, adding that many current Iranian officials would already be familiar with Munir from earlier roles.

That continuity, he argued, gives Pakistan a rare advantage at a moment when formal diplomatic channels are strained.

“What one can say is that he continues to be one figure internationally who has a personal interaction … in the intelligence community in Iran in the military hierarchy and also on the side of the political leadership,” Saeed said.

“So that’s a huge advantage he has on the other side.”

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi were greeted by Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Army Chief Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir upon their arrival at Nur Khan airbase in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, on April 11, 2026. (Pakistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs/AP)

For Pakistan, that personal access — combined with its simultaneous relationship with Washington — has become central to its effort to position itself as a credible intermediary, even as the region edges closer to confrontation.

At the same time, Pakistan’s role as a mediator has drawn scrutiny, particularly given its longstanding position on Israel and recent inflammatory remarks by senior officials.

When asked whether Pakistan can be seen as a neutral broker while not recognizing Israel — an actor directly involved in strikes on Iran — Saeed downplayed the issue, saying Israel was not part of the diplomatic track.

“Pakistan’s position with regard to relations with Israel has been consistent since our independence,” he said, adding that Islamabad’s mediation efforts were focused solely on Washington and Tehran.

“Neither of their representatives was on the table … Pakistan was mediating between the U.S. and Iran,” he said.

Despite the current escalation, Saeed maintained that diplomatic channels remain open.

Iranians react after a ceasefire announcement at the Enqelab square, in Tehran, on April 8, 2026. The United States and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire Tuesday barely an hour before U.S. President Donald Trump’s deadline to obliterate the rival country was set to expire, with Tehran to temporarily reopen the vital Strait of Hormuz. (AFP via Getty Images)

“There is a lot of space … for resuming the process,” he said, suggesting talks could restart in Islamabad or elsewhere if both sides shift course.

“On Pakistan’s side, from my personal knowledge of the field marshal, they are relentless. They would not give up. They must not have given up. They must be continuously in touch with both sides. And they would try their best to convince both sides that the blockade is not going to be in their interest, in the interest of the region and in the interest of the international community.”