In a significant legal triumph, Stefon Diggs was seen wiping away tears after a jury found him not guilty of assaulting his former private chef, marking a pivotal moment for the NFL free agent.
Allegations against Diggs included accusations of striking and choking chef Jamila Adams during a payment dispute back in December of the previous year. The athlete faced serious charges, namely a felony for strangulation and a misdemeanor for assault and battery, to which he pleaded not guilty. The trial, held over two days in Dedham, concluded with Diggs’ acquittal, a decision that spared him from a potential five-year prison sentence.
As the verdict was announced, Diggs initially displayed no outward reaction. However, the emotional weight of the moment soon became evident as he appeared to wipe tears from his eyes, supported by congratulatory gestures from his team.
Commenting on the trial’s outcome, Diggs’ attorney, Mitch Schuster, highlighted a common issue faced by high-profile individuals, stating, “Fame and financial success shouldn’t strip someone of their presumption of innocence, but too often, it does exactly that.”
Schuster further elaborated on the unique pressures faced by professional athletes, noting, “Athletes often have a target on their back. When people see the uniform and the contract, they see leverage; they see a settlement. They count on public opinion to push for a settlement, irrespective of the actual facts.”
‘Professional athletes have a target on their back. When someone sees a uniform and a contract, they see leverage; they see a settlement. And they’re counting on that pressure in the court of public opinion to drive a default decision to settle regardless of the facts of the matter.
Stefon Diggs seemed to wipe away tears after he was cleared of assaulting his ex-private chef
The case, which hung over Diggs at the Super Bowl, centered on a December 2 encounter
He was accused of striking and choking chef Jamila Adams during an alleged dispute over pay
‘The evidence has shown what we’ve maintained from day one: Mr. Diggs was wrongly accused, and this case represents exactly the kind of opportunistic targeting that players can face the moment they step off the field.’
The case, which hung over Diggs at this year’s Super Bowl, centered on a December 2 encounter at Diggs’ home in Dedham, where Jamila Adams – a former live-in personal chef who is known as Mila – testified he slapped and choked her during an argument.
Diggs’ attorneys said the alleged assault never happened and questioned Adams’ credibility and whether the dispute was about money, relationship tensions – including a disagreement over a planned trip to Miami – or an alleged assault.
They pointed to financial demands she made and testimony from friends and employees who said she did not appear injured in the days after the encounter, while prosecutors argued the case rests on her account of what happened inside the home.
Defense attorney Andrew Kettlewell told jurors during closing arguments that prosecutors had not presented ‘a single shred of credible evidence’ that an assault occurred.
Assistant District Attorney Drew Virtue urged jurors to weigh Adams’ testimony carefully and not to disregard it because she was not ‘a perfect witness.’
‘She was argumentative, avoidant, difficult. But does that mean you should throw away everything she said? No,’ he said, adding that jurors should give her testimony ‘the attention, the scrutiny, the weight it deserves.’
Earlier in the trial, Adams became emotional on the stand while describing an alleged encounter with Diggs on in which she said he entered her room following an argument over text.
Adams, who said she lived in the NFL star´s home and prepared all of his meals, testified that Diggs ‘smacked me with an open hand’ before wrapping his arm around her neck and choking her, leaving her struggling to breathe.
She described what she called a ‘complicated’ relationship, saying it had previously been sexual but was not at the time of the alleged assault.
The wide receiver pleaded not guilty to a charges of strangulation and assault and battery
Diggs and the New England Patriots reached Super Bowl LX, where they lost to the Seahawks
Adams said she met Diggs in 2022 on Instagram and that the two became friends – at times ‘friends with benefits,’ as one of his attorneys described it – before she was later hired to live in his home and prepare his meals during the football season.
Defense attorneys pressed Adams about money she said she was owed after working as a live-in chef. She testified she was paid about $2,000 a week and believed she had not been fully compensated after being sent home.
They pointed to a $19,000 demand and said the amount increased over time, with her attorney later seeking $5.5 million.
When asked about the $5.5 million claim, Adams said, ‘I can´t speak on that,’ and at other points told jurors, ‘I don´t understand the question’ and ‘I don´t know how to answer the question.’
At one point, Adams said Diggs had offered her $100,000 to recant her statement to the police, but that remark was struck from the record after the judge called the attorneys to a sidebar.
At times during her second day on the stand, Adams was instructed by the judge to answer questions directly and not include additional details beyond what was asked. Portions of her responses were struck from the record as nonresponsive, with jurors told to disregard them.
‘This is not an opportunity for you to interject your own narrative and evade answering questions,’ Judge Jeanmarie Carroll told her at one point, warning that continued nonresponsive answers could result in her testimony being stricken.
Kenneth Ellis, the Dedham police officer who took Adams´ initial report, testified that she arrived at the station visibly upset, telling jurors she ‘sat down on the bench and she was crying.’ He said Adams initially asked to speak with a female officer before later agreeing to give a statement and identifying Diggs as the person involved.
Under cross-examination, Ellis said he did not observe visible injuries, collect photographs or speak with other witnesses, and that his investigation relied largely on Adams´ account and text messages she provided.
The wide receiver is seen arriving at Norfolk County District Court in Dedham, Massachusetts
Defense attorneys also sought to challenge Adams´ account through testimony from people in Diggs´ orbit and evidence they said reflected her demeanor in the days after the alleged incident.
His chief of staff, massage therapist, a nurse who provided IV treatments and his hairstylist all testified that they saw her around the time of the attack and that she said nothing about being assaulted.
His hairstylist, Xia Charles, testified that she spent time with Adams in New York in the days after the alleged incident and did not notice any injuries. She said Adams appeared normal and that she did not see marks on her neck or elsewhere.
Defense attorneys also showed jurors cellphone videos of Adams socializing, including clips of her in a car listening to music and dancing, which they suggested showed her demeanor in the days following the incident.
Jeanelle Sales, Diggs’ chief of staff, who also goes by ‘Sunni,’ testified she saw Adams at the home on the day she alleged she was assaulted and did not see visible marks, redness or swelling on her neck or face. She said Adams appeared to be in normal spirits.
‘She was walking around looking for a piece of paper and a pen to write a card – I guess, write a note to him for his birthday gift,’ Sales said.
Prosecutors pushed back on that testimony, suggesting the witnesses’ livelihoods were tied to Diggs and that they had a financial interest in the outcome of the case.
The case was one of two legal headaches that clouded the Patriots’ run to Super Bowl LX. In the other, prosecutors announced in March that a domestic assault and battery charge against defensive lineman Christian Barmore was being dropped.
