Share this

Billionaire Ken Griffin’s electronic trading firm, Citadel Securities, is under fire again over its role in the January trading frenzy in shares of GameStop Corp. GME -5.74% after new information surfaced in a lawsuit.

Citadel Securities in a statement Tuesday rejected “Internet conspiracies and Twitter mobs” that have again accused the firm of pushing Robinhood Markets Inc. HOOD -0.31% and other brokerages to limit trading in GameStop and other meme stocks on Jan. 28, a move that resulted in losses for many small investors.

The unusual statement came as the hashtag #KenGriffinLied was trending on Twitter.

The furor was prompted by internal Robinhood communications made public last week as part of a lawsuit filed by investors who were affected by the trading restrictions. The suit is seeking damages from Robinhood and a number of other brokerages, as well as Citadel Securities and some firms that clear stock trades.

The communications showed executives from Robinhood and Citadel Securities held discussions in the days before the Jan. 28 move, when both firms were grappling with surging trading volumes in meme stocks. While the communications don’t make it clear what the firms discussed, they indicate the talks were acrimonious. In an internal chat message dated Jan. 27, the president of Robinhood’s stockbrokerage arm, Jim Swartwout, said “you wouldnt believe the convo we had with Citadel. total mess.”

Lawyers for the plaintiffs said in a court filing last week that the communications showed Citadel Securities pressured Robinhood to curb small investors’ trading.

Citadel Securities—which executes many of the orders submitted by Robinhood customers—has denied exerting such pressure. In February, Mr. Griffin, the firm’s founder and main shareholder, said in written testimony to the House Financial Services Committee that his firm “had no role in Robinhood’s decision to limit trading in GameStop or any other of the ‘meme’ stocks.”

The trading firm reiterated its stance on Tuesday. “Conspiracy theorists and plaintiffs’ lawyers are trying to concoct an absurd story from regular-way communications among Citadel Securities and the brokers who handle orders for retail investors,” Citadel Securities said in the statement.

The firm said its discussions with brokerages during the GameStop frenzy were aimed at ensuring market stability. “Amid an unprecedented surge in retail trading engagement, our respective teams made sure that operational demands were addressed and that retail investors had access to Citadel Securities’ superior execution capabilities,” Citadel Securities said.

A spokeswoman for Robinhood denied on Tuesday that Citadel Securities had pressured the brokerage to impose the trading restrictions.

“These complaints attempt to create a false narrative of collusion, and we will work vigorously to continue correcting the record with the facts,” she said. “In times of market stress, it’s normal and advisable for us to communicate even more with our market centers.”

Robinhood has said that it imposed the Jan. 28 trading curbs because of a $3 billion margin call that morning from the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., which runs the clearinghouse of U.S. stock trades. By imposing the limits, Robinhood reduced the amount of money it needed to post at the clearinghouse. The DTCC has corroborated Robinhood’s account.

GameStop’s stock price fell 44% on Jan. 28 after a number of brokerages imposed the limits, which prevented many investors from buying the shares or adding to their holdings. The price of the videogame retailer’s stock had rallied earlier, buoyed by a broad campaign on Reddit and other social-media sites in which investors touted GameStop and a few other stocks.

The episode has prompted several congressional hearings and is expected to be the subject of a soon-to-be-released report from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Electronic trading firms such as Citadel Securities pay retail brokerages for the right to execute their customers’ stock and option orders, a practice called payment for order flow. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has said the agency is examining payment for order flow as part of a broader review of U.S. stock-market structure prompted by the meme-stock phenomenon.

Following the GameStop trading frenzy, the SEC is expected to take a fresh look at payment for order flow, a decades-old practice that’s at the heart of how commission-free trading works. WSJ explains what it is, and why critics say it’s bad for investors. Illustration: Jacob Reynolds/WSJ

Write to Alexander Osipovich at [email protected]

Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Source: WSJ

Share this
You May Also Like

Bitcoin price spikes to $20K as whale bought BTC confirms support

Bitcoin (BTC) rose to clip $20,000 for the first time in five…

HHS Secretary Predicts Roe V. Wade Reversal Won’t ‘Stand Long’

Topline Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra doesn’t believe the Supreme…

It Is Time To Buy Bonds

It is time to add to bond holdings. Bettmann Archive US 10-year…

Bitcoin addresses in loss hit all-time high amid $18K BTC price target

Bitcoin (BTC) meandered into the weekly close on July 3 after weekend…

U.S. Mass Shootings Hover Near Record-Breaking Levels

Topline Six months into this year—and on a day when gunfire killed…

American Taylor Fritz Reaches First Major Quarterfinal At Wimbledon; Nick Kyrgios Makes Final 8, Too

Taylor Fritz of the US celebrates after beating Australia’s Jason Kubler in…

Rafael Nadal Rolls Into Wimbledon Quarterfinals, Moves To 18-0 In Majors In 2022

Spain’s Rafael Nadal reacts after winning a point against Botic Van De…

Let’s Declare Our Independence — From Zoning

Benjamin Franklin with sun glasses getty Today is the day Americans commonly…