Alito slams KBJ's opinion in First Step Act case
Share this @internewscast.com

Left: Justice Samuel Alito during a Heritage Foundation event in October 2022 (YouTube/The Heritage Foundation). Right: Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve, speaks at the 60th Commemoration of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing on September 15, 2023, in Birmingham, Alabama (AP Photo/Butch Dill).

The U.S. Supreme Court delivered a decision on Thursday concerning the fate of first-time offenders and bank robbers who utilized firearms in their crimes and faced lengthy sentences due to the “stacking” of mandatory minimum penalties prior to the First Step Act. These sentences were overturned following a significant legal amendment.

With the introduction of the First Step Act—an important criminal justice reform law enacted by President Donald Trump in 2018—first-time offenders sentenced under federal mandatory minimum statutes for firearm-related offenses became eligible for reduced sentences, though only in cases that were still pending. This left unresolved what should occur for individuals whose sentences, issued before the First Step Act, were annulled after the act became law, and whether they can benefit from the sentencing leniency provided by the act.

A section of the First Step Act — specifically, section 403 — amended the federal law that required an additional 25-year mandatory minimum sentence for certain firearm offenses.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox

The question before the court — stemming from the cases of Hewitt v. United States and Duffey v. United States — was whether the First Step Act’s “sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the First Step Act’s enactment when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the First Step Act’s enactment.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the opinion in five parts, but was only joined by four other justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Neil Gorsuch — in the first three parts. Sotomayor and Kagan joined the opinion in full.

For Jackson and the slim SCOTUS majority, petitioners Corey Duffey, Jarvis Ross and Tony Hewitt were persuasive in arguing that post-First Step Act vacating of a sentence essentially means that the sentence wasn’t imposed pre-First Step Act.

“We hold that, under that circumstance, a sentence ‘has not been imposed’ for purposes of §403(b),” Jackson wrote. “Thus, the First Step Act’s more lenient penalties apply.”

Justice Samuel Alito, on the other hand, led the dissent and was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

In Alito’s view, it remains true that Duffey’s, Hewitt’s, and Ross’ sentences were actually imposed in 2010, well before the First Step Act was enacted. He wrote that Jackson’s majority “disfigures the Act in order to reach a different result,” and he suggested that activism was a driving factor.

“The Court’s interpretation thus unspools the Act’s carefully wound retroactivity command to mean that any defendant whose sentence is vacated at any time and for any reason may claim the benefit of the Act’s reduced mandatory minimum,” he wrote. “But nothing in the text or broader context supports such a boundless interpretation.”

Alito next emphasized that there were portions of Jackson’s opinion that only the liberal wing of the court joined.

“Indeed, the portions of today’s decision that command the votes of only three Justices give the game away. Animating the Court’s atextual interpretation is a thinly veiled desire to march in the parade of sentencing reform. But our role is to interpret the statute before us, not overhaul criminal sentencing,” he added.

Notably, Jackson directly responded in a footnote to Alito’s “march in the parade” remark, disputing that characterization and stating that the majority “merely” supported Congress’ intent.

“The dissent agrees that our job is to ‘interpret what Congress meant’ by the words in §403(b). Here, Congress’s desire to change the derided, draconian sentencing stacking scheme” created by Supreme Court precedent “could not be clearer,” she wrote. “Thus, far from ‘march[ing] in the parade of sentencing reform,’ we are merely observing the events and circumstances that led Congress to take up the banner of sentencing reform itself.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

“Officials Report Idaho Sniper’s Surprise Attack: Two Firefighters Killed, One Injured”

In northern Idaho’s rugged landscape, two firefighters lost their lives and another…

Bryan Kohberger Allegedly Agrees to Plea Deal to Avoid Death Penalty

Prosecutors have offered a plea deal to Bryan Kohberger, a former criminology…

Judges of the 5th Circuit Intensely Question Lawyers in Alien Enemies Act Case

President Donald Trump delivers remarks during a press briefing with Elon Musk…

Suspected Assassin Complains of Sleepless Nights in Jail

Inset: Vance Boelter (Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office). Background: Security footage is said…

Delay in Release for Abrego Garcia Due to Deportation Uncertainty

Left: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national who resided in Maryland before…

Trucker Allegedly Falls Asleep, Resulting in 5 Fatalities Involving 18-Wheeler

Inset: Alexis Osmani Gonzalez-Companioni (Kaufman County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The crash scene…

Young Man Found Dead Just Hours After Being Seen Alive

A young man was murdered within hours of his last sighting, documents…

Who Was Wess Roley – The Idaho shooter? Theories about his gender: Was the Suspect A Russian – MAGA?

Wess Roley was identified as the 20-year-old shooter who killed two firefighters…

Sydney Teacher’s Disturbing Effort to Shift Blame onto Students

A paedophilic primary school teacher has shown no remorse for robbing eight…

Shooting Suspect at Forest View Apartments Receives 120-Day Jail Term and 3-Year Probation

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Jamie Lamarr Ball, 49, who faced arrest…

Probationer Detained for Gun Possession Amid Armed Disturbance Inquiry

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Early this morning, Kimon Marcus Miller, 35,…

Man Alters Plea in Case of Baby’s Fatal ‘Severe Impact’

Michael Mayor (Miami County Sheriff”s Office). An Ohio man who pleaded not…