Judge blocks layoffs at Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the Oval Office at the White House, Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo/Alex Brandon).

An attorney from the Department of Justice faced challenging questions and endured a difficult experience in a Washington, D.C., courtroom on Thursday as he persisted in his ongoing solo efforts to defend the Trump administration’s controversial campaign against major law firms.

Richard Lawson is the sole attorney the government has opted to deploy in court to counter lawsuits brought by law firms such as Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block, and WilmerHale.

During a two-hour motions hearing before U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan regarding the Trump administration’s attempt to weaken Susman Godfrey LLP, the newly appointed deputy associate attorney general was momentarily left without words.

And it happened twice.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

As the court unraveled several issues in President Donald Trump‘s April 9 executive order, key sticking points during the hearing concerned an allegation that the Los Angeles-based law firm “engages in unlawful discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of race.”

During his time at the dais, Susman Godfrey’s lead attorney, Donald Verrilli, said the president’s findings were “completely baseless.”

The Joe Biden-appointed judge, for her part, repeatedly tried to ferret out what, exactly, the government had based the discrimination allegation on.

And there, Lawson was admittedly lacking.

“I don’t have the hard data on hiring,” the DOJ lawyer said at one point.

Instead, Lawson tried to defend Trump’s order by suggesting the court shift to a more nebulous but more holistic inquiry into “the quantum of proof that must exist” for the executive to determine a potential policy. To that end, Lawson argued, the answer is: “it’s low.”

In other words, the government lawyer was trying to move the debate away from specifics and into a framework where the court would be amenable to giving the president broad discretion — even, and perhaps especially, if the specifics are difficult to come by. Lawson suggested the court could sign off on a policy where the president acts based on his subjective understanding of the law firm’s commitments to diversity.

“There has to be some level of discretion afforded to the executive,” he said.

But the judge was not having it.

“I don’t know how, if you’re relying on a legally erroneous statement, you’re allowed to exercise that discretion,” AliKhan replied.

The sole statement in Trump’s order supporting the allegation is: “For example, Susman administers a program where it offers financial awards and employment opportunities only to ‘students of color.””

That line, it turns out, is a reference to the Susman Godfrey Prize, which the law firm describes as “[a]n honor awarded annually to up to 20 students of color who are finishing their first or second year at an eligible law school” and “part of the firm’s ongoing commitment to celebrate and promote diversity among civil trial lawyers.”

The government lawyer was pressed to concede that the prize is not unlawful discrimination in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, despite previous language in court filings highlighting the prize and suggesting it is unlawfully discriminatory.

“It doesn’t seem like anything you have alleged in section one constitutes unlawful racial discrimination,” AliKhan said.

The judge noted that the language regarding the prize is the only example of racial discrimination that Trump’s order contains — and that the line comes immediately after the allegation.

“I just don’t know how you square the circle,” AliKhan said.

While Lawson tried to move on to a different-but-related argument, the judge pushed him to account for the line about the prize.

“So, the only example in the executive order that has to do with racial discrimination isn’t actually an example?” the judge asked, waiting a beat before demanding an answer: “Yes or no?”

A long silence followed.

“Yes or no, sir,” the judge pressed.

More silence.

While the government lawyer did not have an answer, he finally spoke up to say as much.

“I would like to think about that, your honor,” Lawson said.

AliKhan replied: “I would like an answer before you leave my courtroom.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Mother Confesses to Bathtub Drowning of Her Children

Brittany Medina (Lawrence County Sheriff”s Department) and her children, Jackson and Maddie…

Police Report: Woman Allegedly Stabs Boyfriend’s Face Multiple Times While He Watched TV

Inset: Christina Morris (CTPD). Background: The area in Pennsylvania where Morris allegedly…

Woman Accidentally Backs Over Husband Following Dispute: Police Report

Inset: Dara Masterson (Sebastian County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The area in Arkansas…

Farmer Found Guilty of Killing Missing Girl on His Property

Inset: Jade Colvin (Iowa Department of Public Safety). Background: James Bachmurski at…

Federal Judges Express Dissatisfaction with Gorsuch and the Supreme Court

U.S. Supreme Court Justices, from left, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan,…

Parents Subject Son to Horrifying Punishment: Police Report

Lisa Gutenberger, left, and Gabriel Gutenberger (WBAY). A mother and father from…

Georgia Dentist Commits Family Murder-Suicide

In what authorities describe as a murder-suicide, a Georgia dentist, along with…

Husband Allegedly Murders Wife While Kids Sleep, Flees Scene, Police Report

Background: The 2600 block of Yeager Street in Fort Worth, Texas (Google…

Jury Fails to Decide in Murder Trial

A jury has been unable to decide whether a wheelchair user who…

Gilgo Beach Murders: New DNA Technique Approved as Evidence in Rex Heuermann Trial

A judge in Suffolk County, New York, has approved the use of…

Gainesville resident taken into custody for repeated indecent exposure in retail locations

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Dominique Demetri Merricks, 29, was arrested yesterday…

High Springs Resident Sentenced for Distributing Child Pornography

Press release from the U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Florida GAINESVILLE, Fla.…