In a dramatic turn of events on Wednesday, a district court in New York made headlines by appointing a successor for one of the Department of Justice’s acting U.S. attorneys deemed “not lawfully serving.” This decision sparked an immediate reaction from the Trump administration, culminating in a swift dismissal announcement on social media, reminiscent of a previous standoff from the summer months.

The individual at the center of this controversy, John Sarcone, had steadfastly maintained his position as the acting chief prosecutor for the Northern District of New York. He did so through his roles as the first assistant U.S. attorney and a special attorney, even after a judge invalidated his grand jury subpoenas directed at the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James. The judge highlighted that Sarcone had “used authority he did not lawfully possess” to issue these subpoenas.

According to a report by Law&Crime over a week ago, Sarcone continued to list himself as the acting U.S. attorney in court documents, notably in the context of a legal effort to dismiss Maurene Comey’s lawsuit challenging her termination.

Sarcone’s involvement in defending the Department of Justice arose because the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District recused itself from the case. This recusal was due to Comey’s decade-long tenure there and the fact that her father, James Comey, previously led the office.

John Sarcone, known for his loyalty to Donald Trump, was appointed by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in late February. Despite lacking prosecutorial experience and having notably criticized the Democratic Party as “evil,” Sarcone was sworn in as an interim U.S. Attorney. However, when his 120-day interim period was nearing its end, a federal court decided against extending his appointment, similar to what happened with Alina Habba in New Jersey.

Ultimately, the courts took decisive action by appointing replacements for both Sarcone and other prosecutors in similar situations.

But Bondi kept both Sarcone and Habba in their temporary roles and continued sidestepping the U.S. Senate confirmation process by simultaneously naming them a “Special Attorney to the Attorney General” and first assistant U.S. attorneys, normally the second-in-command in the office but not in the circumstance where there is no superior.

Previously, Bondi slammed “rogue judges” for exercising their own statutory authority to appoint a U.S. attorney. The AG removed the court’s pick to replace Habba, citing Trump’s “core Article II powers.”

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche struck much the same tone on Wednesday when reacting to the Northern District of New York District Court’s appointment of Donald Kinsella to replace Sarcone.

“Judges don’t pick U.S. Attorneys, @POTUS does. See Article II of our Constitution. You are fired, Donald Kinsella,” Blanche posted on X.

In a brief announcement, the court cited 28 U.S. Code § 546(d) to name Kinsella the U.S. attorney, pointing to his “more than 50 years of experience in complex criminal and civil litigation” and his time as the criminal chief of the office.

Under the statute, when a U.S. attorney’s stint has expired, the “district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled.” And under Article II, Congress “may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.”

“Mr. Kinsella was sworn in as the United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York in a private ceremony on February 11, 2026,” the court noted.

Rather than letting the appointment be, the DOJ is going to bat for Sarcone, whose time in office has included the pursuit of criminal grand jury subpoenas of Letitia James’ office.

The subpoenas were issued over the summer as part of the DOJ’s criminal investigation into the Democratic AG’s civil fraud lawsuit against Trump and his family business, and James’ lawsuit against the NRA.

On Jan. 8, Senior U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield ruled that Bondi’s appointment of Sarcone was unlawful and that the subpoenas had to be quashed.

“Mr. Sarcone is not lawfully serving as Acting U.S. Attorney for the NDNY. His appointment violates the FVRA and the statutes governing U.S. Attorney appointments. Several courts, including the Third Circuit, have recently addressed similar appointment maneuvers and reached the same conclusion,” Schofield wrote, in part referring to dismissals of the DOJ’s criminal cases against James Comey and Letitia James in the Eastern District of Virginia due to Lindsey Halligan’s unlawful interim appointment.

“Because Mr. Sarcone used authority he did not lawfully possess to direct the issuance of the subpoenas, the subpoenas are quashed,” Schofield added, disqualifying Sarcone from “further participation in the underlying criminal investigations.”

The DOJ has sought a stay of that ruling pending appeal, asserting that Sarcone is lawfully serving by virtue of his titles of special attorney and first assistant U.S. attorney, and that the subpoenas should be revived.

Not long ago, Halligan stepped aside from an interim U.S. attorney role after judges began the process for replacing her and one jurist questioned why she was still carrying on the “charade,” using a title she did not lawfully hold.