Justice Jackson unveils fiery dissent in discrimination case
Share this @internewscast.com

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the first Black woman to serve on the nation’s highest judicial body, delivered a speech at the 60th Anniversary of the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing on Friday, September 15, 2023, in Birmingham, Alabama (AP Photo/Butch Dill).

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court chose not to hear the case of a Black adult entertainer from Texas, who claimed she and other Black women faced racial discrimination at two strip clubs in the Houston area. These clubs allegedly imposed quotas that limited the number of Black performers who could work simultaneously.

By a 7-2 decision, the justices rejected the request from Chanel Nicholson. They concluded that the timeline to file the lawsuit, which is four years, started in 2014 when she first encountered the alleged racial discrimination. The last reported instance in 2021 did not extend her eligibility to file, rendering her claim ineligible due to it being past the legal time limit.

The majority’s decision leaves in place a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit which held that the later instances of alleged discrimination — not allowing Nicholson to work “if too many other Black performers were already present” at the clubs — were merely the “continued effects of prior instances of race-based exclusion and thus were not independently actionable.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson penned a dissent — joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor — in which she scolded the appellate court as well as her colleagues in the majority for allegedly ignoring unambiguous precedent regarding actionable cases of race discrimination in employment law.

“That holding flouts this Court’s clear precedents. We have long held that ‘each discrete discriminatory act starts a new clock for filing charges alleging that act,’ regardless of whether similar instances of discrimination have occurred in the past,” Jackson wrote. “Because the Fifth Circuit’s contrary ruling was patently erroneous, this Court should have granted Nicholson’s petition and summarily reversed the judgment. I respectfully dissent from the Court’s decision to do otherwise.”

Nicholson in 2021 filed the suit against the clubs Splendor and Cover Girls, both of which were owned and operated by the same individuals. The complaint alleged it was “well-known” that both clubs were instructed to “severely limit the total number of Black Dancers on their respective premises” at the direction of upper management.

She claimed that she was turned away from the clubs about three times per week “due to her race.”

According to the complaint, in November 2017, Nicholson said she attempted to work a shift at Cover Girls, but was “told by a manager that she could not perform because there were already ‘too many black girls’ in the club.” After a hiatus from dancing, she attempted to return to Splendor in August 2021 — while her contract with the club was still in effect — but a manager allegedly refused her entry, telling her they were “not taking any more black girls.”

The lower courts held that because Nicholson began being discriminated against when she began working at the clubs in 2014, and was denied access to the clubs for the same “discriminatory reason” in 2021, the later discrimination was not actionable because “nothing had changed.”

The 5th Circuit wrote that Nicholson’s “denial of access” to the club “on account of her race” in 2021 was “merely a continued effect of the first alleged discriminatory act that took place in 2014.”

Jackson, on the other hand, asserted that both instances of racial discrimination should be treated independent of previous discriminatory acts.

From the dissent:

The fact that Nicholson allegedly suffered similar acts of race discrimination in the past has no bearing on whether those two claims can proceed. As this Court has made abundantly clear, “the existence of past acts and the employee’s prior knowledge of their occurrence … does not bar employees from filing claims about related discrete acts so long as the acts are independently discriminatory.” Rather, “each discrete discriminatory act starts a new clock for filing charges alleging that act.”

That last point bears repeating plainly, in light of the Fifth Circuit’s obvious confusion: If the discrete act that is the subject of the plaintiff ’s discrimination complaint is itself discriminatory, and if it allegedly occurred within the statute of limitations period, then that discrimination claim is timely — full stop.”

The court’s decision, Jackson writes, effectively “inoculates” the clubs and their owners from recent discriminatory conduct based on their own “sustained discriminatory motivation.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Caregiver Accused of Misusing Client’s Bank Account for Grocery Shopping and Food Orders

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – A 22-year-old named Marquisha S. Jackson was…

Father Fatally Shot Near Stage During Dance Recital: Police Report

Inset: Marcus Sanders (Metro Jail). Background: The Saenger Theatre in Mobile, Alabama…

Newark Mayor Files Lawsuit Against Alina Habba Following Arrest Incident at ICE Facility

Left: Alina Habba, who was formerly President Donald Trump’s attorney, is pictured…

Mother Neglects Disabled 18-Year-Old, Leading to Severe Weight Loss

Left: Naomia Prairie (Pennington County Sheriff’s Department). Right: Donny Merrival (Sioux Funeral…

Lawsuit Claims Trump Administration Overlooked Immigrant DNA Collection FOIA Requests

President Donald Trump attends the signing of the Laken Riley Act in…

Police: Man Planned to Watch Ex-Girlfriend Sleep Through Her Window

Inset: Jalen Vallejos (Volusia County Sheriff’s Office). Background: Vallejos after deputies apprehended…

US Authorities Unveil Photorealistic Image of ‘Devil in the Ozarks’ Amid Ongoing Manhunt

Arkansas authorities have released a photo rendering of a convicted murderer and…

South Jordan Police Report Alisa Petrov Located Safely

Fifteen-year-old Alisa Petrov, who had been reported missing from Utah, made her…

Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Court Case: $30K Paid to Hotel Guard for Cassie Assault Footage, $1M NDA Signed

The security guard at the California hotel where Sean “Diddy” Combs was…

Appeal Over Tariffs to Be Reviewed by Three Trump-Appointed Judges in D.C. Circuit

President Donald Trump participates in the 157th National Memorial Day Observance at…

Gainesville Resident Receives Eight-Year Sentence for November 2022 Bicyclist Fatality on South Main Street

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – A 32-year-old woman named Margaret Caitlin Walker…

Police Chief Commends Sentencing of Anti-Vaxxer for Assaulting Officer

Raina Cruise launched her alcohol-fuelled attack on Senior Constable Anthea Beck in…