Trump wins over groups who challenged anti-DEI orders
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump observes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent formally swears in Paul Atkins as the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Oval Office at the White House on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

Two states in the Pacific Northwest are urgently requesting a federal court to prevent President Donald Trump and his administration from meddling with their established election procedures.

On March 25, the 45th and 47th president signed Executive Order 14248, titled “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections.” This order aims to significantly alter the administration of elections across the country by, among other measures, enforcing a rule that requires all voters to provide official documentation proving their citizenship and discontinuing vote-by-mail systems that accept ballots postmarked by but received after Election Day.

In Oregon and Washington, the default voting mechanism is a postal ballot; such vote-by-mail systems have been in place for decades.

On Thursday, in a 35-page motion for partial summary judgment, the states asked U.S. District Judge John H. Chun, a Joe Biden appointee, to permanently enjoin multiple sections of Trump’s order as unconstitutional and ultra vires, or, beyond the president’s power.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

“The Constitution is clear: States are responsible for regulating ‘[t]he Times, Places and Manner’ of federal elections, subject only to alteration by Congress,” the motion begins. “The President has no constitutional authority to interfere with state election laws. Nor has Congress given the President statutory authority to do so.”

The plaintiffs are looking for a quick end to the litigation at the district court level by arguing the far-reaching the order simply lacks any authority to undo electoral prerogatives long-exercised by the states.

“Among other things, this order purports to impose new restrictions on registering to vote, set aside long-standing and widespread state laws setting ballot-return deadlines, and dictate which voting machines can be federally certified,” the motion reads. “But the President has no authority to do any of this. And by attempting to assert unilateral control over elections, the President is threatening the foundation of our democracy.”

And without such authority, the plaintiffs say, Trump’s order has no merit — and any agencies enforcing it would be breaking the law.

“The Framers carefully divided power over elections between the States and Congress to prevent the accumulation of power in any one source,” the motion continues. “The President’s illegal effort to consolidate his nonexistent power over elections flies in the face of that principle.”

Chief among the plaintiffs’ complaints are the government’s efforts to prohibit states from accepting mail ballots received after Election Day. In Washington and Oregon, such votes are counted “as long as the ballots were cast on or before election day,” the motion explains.

Trump, for his part, likens such laws to “allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct.”

To that end, the government has sought to condition “any available funding to a State” on the exclusion of ballots received after Election Day. In another case challenging the executive order, the government advanced the notion of using “criminal” prosecutions to secure compliance with the proposed ban.

The states rubbished the Trump administration’s efforts to change their ballot-receipt deadlines as ultra vires — that is, an overreach extending beyond legal power or authority — and lacking any basis in statute.

“This is entirely unlawful,” the motion continues. “Federal law does not create a ballot-receipt deadline. The statutes cited in the Executive Order (2 U.S.C. § 7 and 3 U.S.C. § 1) are conspicuously silent on when timely-cast ballots must be received. The President has no authority to invent new election regulations. Any effort by the U.S. Attorney General to enforce the made-up ballot-receipt deadline is unlawful, as is imposing new, non-congressionally approved conditions on federal funding.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Kouri Richins Faces Additional 26 Fraud Charges Alongside Husband’s Murder Accusation

A Utah woman, accused of murdering her husband and subsequently authoring a…

Archer Resident Faces Second Conviction for Not Registering as Sex Offender

Press release from the U.S. Attorney, Northern District of Florida GAINESVILLE, Fla.…

Mother Sentenced for Involvement in Teens’ Alleged Killing of Man

Background: News footage displaying the location of Santiago Roybal’s murder in 2023,…

District Attorney Reports 9-Year-Old, Kept Hidden by Parents, Has Died.

Inset, left to right: Sampaguita L. Jones and Sherman Jones (Detroit Police…

Trump’s Attempt to Dismiss Central Park 5 Defamation Case Unsuccessful

Inset, left to right: Yusef Salaam, Antron McCray, Korey Wise, Kevin Richardson,…

Judge Expands Ban on Trump’s Directive Against Law Firm

President Donald Trump participates in a session of the G7 Summit, Monday,…

Man Who Paralyzed Ex-Girlfriend Receives Sentencing

Background: The 800 block of East Virginia Avenue in Peoria, Illinois (Google…

Diddy Fires Back: State Prepares for Closing Defense Arguments

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal team wrapped up presenting their case today with…

No Leniency Shown by Judge in Hate-Driven Murder Case Conviction

Background: Footage from the courtroom shows Judge Donald Zuidmulder at the sentencing…

Man’s Sentence Revealed for Assisting in Moving 5-Year-Old’s Body

Left to right: Benjamin Rivera and Samuel Olson (Houston Police Dept.). A…

DOJ Reports Man Threatened Alina Habba, Calling Her a ‘Traitor’

Trump attorney Alina Habba leaves New York Supreme Court on Monday, Oct.…

Shocking Report: 5th Grade Girls Allegedly Plan Classmate’s Murder, Intend to Disguise It as Suicide

Authorities in Arizona have detained four fifth-grade girls who allegedly planned to…