The proprietor of a T-shirt company in southern Indiana allegedly claimed to be raising funds for a murdered Kentucky teenager. However, deputies say she kept the profits for herself and only made superficial attempts to compensate the boy’s family when they confronted her.

Bryce Gerlach, 18, lost his life on Oct. 12, 2024, during a fall festival in New Albany, located just northwest of Louisville. Four individuals were charged with firing shots at the Harvest Homecoming event, according to the local Fox affiliate WDRB. It is alleged that during an altercation, each suspect discharged a firearm, hitting three bystanders. While two victims survived, Gerlach, a senior and football player at Corydon Central High School, did not.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

Enter Amber Tower, the proprietor of Tower’s Tees. She allegedly collected donations on behalf of the Bryce Gerlach Memorial Scholarship Fund and yet she did not give a deposit, a witness said, according to court documents. Authorities say she put up advertisements for Gerlach-related merchandise including “Justice for Bryce” shorts, and related bracelets.

From the documents:

Upon arrival, I spoke to the complainant D.G. and H.B. D.G. informed me that he created a Bryce Gerlach Memorial Scholarship Fund account at Regions Bank. They told me that Tower’s Tees has collected monetary donations for the fund and

kept them. D.G. said he had never been contacted by Tower’s Tees. He said he has also checked the memorial fund account and has not seen a deposit from Tower’s Tees.

Authorities claim that defendant Amber Tower owed the family a total of $13,615.93 — higher than her initial estimate of $3,125.50. She is now charged with criminal conversion.

“I asked her why it took until March 7th, 2025 to give the family donations,” wrote an investigator for the Harrison County Sheriff’s Department. “I informed her that it took until the family confronted her for her to write them a check. I asked her when she planned on donating if the family had never confronted her. She told me that she was going to ‘soon’. I asked her what soon meant and informed her that that was not an acceptable answer. I told her that it appeared as if she was not ever going to give them the money.”