Share this @internewscast.com

A California federal court has halted the Trump administration from executing immigration raids solely based on individuals’ “apparent race or ethnicity.”

In a 52-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, appointed by Joe Biden, issued two temporary restraining orders. The first order protects individuals in Southern California who claim their constitutional rights have been infringed upon by deportation operations. The second order supports attorneys who assert they are being obstructed from effectively consulting with their clients, violating constitutional rights.

The judge took the government to task for, in her view, denying the reality of the situation in the counties of Los Angeles and Orange.

“[T]he federal government concurs: Roving patrols without reasonable suspicion breach the Fourth Amendment, and restricting legal access breaches the Fifth Amendment,” the order states. “Despite overwhelming evidence presented here, the federal government wants this Court to believe that none of this misconduct is actually occurring.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox

The court later rubbished those efforts as presenting a series of simple questions – which were easy enough to answer.

The order offsets those questions to highlight them:

Do all individuals regardless of immigration status-share in the rights guaranteed by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution? Yes, they do.

Is it illegal to conduct roving patrols which identify people based upon race alone, aggressively question them, and then detain them without a warrant, without their consent, and without reasonable suspicion that they are without status? Yes, it is.

Is it unlawful to prevent people from having access to lawyers who can help them in immigration court? Yes, it is.

During the first week of June, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents began a series of increasingly widespread enforcement actions in the broader Los Angeles area. Golden State protesters responded and the situation quickly became tense – with President Donald Trump seizing command of California’s National Guard regiment on June 7 in an effort to quell the protests.

Since then, militarized deportation sweeps have continued apace.

“Various places have been targeted by federal agents,” the court explains. “In one instance, the agents approached and prevented a non-white individual from walking away but not those who appeared to be Caucasians.”

The underlying lawsuit in the case was filed earlier this month.

The court credited the plaintiffs’ framing of those sweeps as more persuasive than the defenses advanced by the federal government.

“Defendants have a policy and practice of effectuating warrantless arrests without making an individualized flight risk determination,” the order goes on. “Defendants also have a policy and practice of not identifying themselves or explaining the basis for an arrest upon taking someone into custody. Agents and officers often show up masked, without any visible badges or insignia indicating what agency they work for, and have refused to identify themselves when asked.”

Frimpong, in ruling for the plaintiffs, also barred the government from relying on several other factors currently used by federal agents as the basis for their large-scale immigration sweeps.

The injunction for the detained plaintiffs bars ICE agents from relying on a person’s use of Spanish or “English with an accent” for a detention stop. The government also cannot use anyone’s “[p]resence at a particular location” or the “type of work” they do to articulate reasonable suspicion for such a stop.

In the injunction for the legal aid plaintiffs, Frimpong ordered the government to allow attorneys access to the massive, impromptu immigrant detention center in the basement of the downtown Los Angeles federal building – which is known as “Room B-18.”

The court additionally denied the government a pre-requested stay of the injunctions on the grounds that they failed to make “any showing that such a stay is warranted.”

“The Court does not find prejudice to Defendants,” Frimpong mused. “[C]ompliance with the Fourth Amendment is nothing new, contrary to Defendants’ claims. Complying with the law does not impose harm.”

The post ‘The Fourth Amendment is nothing new’: first appeared on Law & Crime.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

“Help Solve the Mystery: FBI Offers $25K Reward for Leads on Missing Massachusetts 4-Year-Old from 1978”

The FBI is offering a $25,000 reward for information that leads to…

SCOTUS Blocks Trump’s Attempt to Dismiss Lisa Cook

Left: Federal Reserve Board of Governors member Lisa Cook attends a Board…

Man Allegedly Poured Hot Water on Vulnerable Person, Police Report

Background: The building located on the 5300 block of South Rock Ridge…

Police: Man attempted to murder wheelchair user on street

Inset: Montez Edward Bolden (Springfield Police Department). Background: The location in Springfield,…

Police Discover Missing Woman Hidden in Attic in Gruesome Crime Scene

Insets, top to bottom: Douglas Shaw and Renia Lewis (Vallejo Police Department).…

19-Year-Old Expectant Mother Appears in Court Following Alleged Police Chase with Baby in Car

A pregnant 19-year-old woman faced court today after engaging in a high-speed…

Michigan Father Opens Fire on His Children, Claims Stress Over Sentencing for Indecent Exposure

A Michigan father was bound over for trial last week after gunning…

Family Secures Significant Compensation from Agency Following Son’s Tragic Passing

Noah Cuatro smiles in a photograph (GoFundMe). Los Angeles County will compensate…

Erin Patterson, Accused in Mushroom-Related Deaths, Faces Imminent Deadline for Appeal

Patterson was found guilty of three counts of murder and one count…

Weeks After a Raucous Party at Elaine’s House, She Disappeared

On its surface, the NSW Sutherland Shire was a carefree place to…

Man Receives Sentence for Killing Second Wife Following First Wife’s Death

Kenneth Robson (Hampden County District Attorney”s Office). A Massachusetts man faces several…

Mother Accused of Shooting and Stabbing Son to “End His Suffering”: Police

Inset: Krista Roy (St. Charles County Jail). Background: The Missouri home where…