Federal Minister for Communications Anika Wells during a press conference where they released new guidance to provide clear directions for platforms as part of the Australian Governments world-leading under-16 social media laws. Sydney, NSW. September 16, 2025.
Share this @internewscast.com

Today, Australia steps into the global spotlight as it becomes the first country to implement age restrictions on social media usage.

As of midnight, Australians under the age of 16 have been barred from accessing social media platforms. So, what does this mean moving forward?

In essence, young Australians can no longer maintain accounts on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, Threads, Snapchat, TikTok, Reddit, X, YouTube, Twitch, and Kick.

Communications Minister Anika Wells anticipates that children across the nation will attempt to bypass these restrictions.

Federal Minister for Communications Anika Wells during a press conference where they released new guidance to provide clear directions for platforms as part of the Australian Governments world-leading under-16 social media laws. Sydney, NSW. September 16, 2025.
Federal Minister for Communications Anika Wells during a press conference where they released new guidance to provide clear directions for platforms as part of the Australian Governments world-leading under-16 social media laws. Sydney, NSW. September 16, 2025. (Kate Geraghty)

The eSafety Commission will be vigilant in monitoring any platforms that young people might switch to and will enforce penalties for any breaches of the new rules.

Here’s a detailed overview of the implications and next steps following the implementation of this ban.

What are the penalties for children under 16?

The federal government acknowledges that the ban will not be “100 per cent effective” in preventing children under 16 from accessing restricted social media platforms and that they will find their ways around it.

“Some of that is going to happen, but that’s what teenagers do,” eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said.

The onus, however, lies on social media platforms and not children who bypass the rules.

There is no penalty for children under 16 who access restricted social media platforms, or their parents or guardians.

The eSafety Commission said the ban is about “protecting young people, not punishing or isolating them”.

Bored male student using phone during a class.
The federal government acknowledges that the ban will not be “100 per cent effective” in preventing children under 16 from accessing restricted social media platforms. (Getty)

What are the penalties for social media platforms?

Platforms face hefty penalties if they do not take “reasonable steps” to prevent children under 16 from having accounts. 

The eSafety Commission defines reasonable steps as:

  1. Enforcing the age restriction in a just and appropriate way, including finding and removing existing accounts
  2. Preventing new accounts and workarounds
  3. Having processes to correct errors if someone is mistakenly missed or included in the restriction

If a platform fails to do so, a court can order civil penalties, including fines of up to $49.5 million.

How are these penalties enforced? 

The eSafety Commission will monitor and enforce any penalties for non-compliance in accordance with the law.

It may also pursue court action. 

Inman Grant said she will start gathering information and issuing compliance notices now that her powers have kicked in. 

Julie Inman Grant. eSafety Commissioner, during a Senate estimates hearing at Parliament House in Canberra on Thursday 30 May 2024. fedpol Photo: Alex Ellinghausen
eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant. (The Sydney Morning Herald)

What happens to my social media account? 

Under-16s will see their social media accounts either be deactivated or deleted, depending on the platform.

Facebook, Instagram, Threads, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, and X indicated they are deactivating accounts until the user is 16. 

Snapchat said it will remove accounts.

All remaining platforms have not specified how exactly the ban will be enforced

Australians over 16 will not be affected. 

Anyone making a new account after today may have to verify their age through facial verification or a government-issued ID.

However, platforms must offer options so that users are not forced to share their ID if they do not wish to. 

Youtube agrees to comply with Australia social media ban.
Youtube agrees to comply with Australia social media ban. (YouTube)

What platforms are banned? 

Social media platforms must meet four conditions to be age-restricted under the ban:

  1. Its sole or significant purpose is to enable online social interaction between two or more users
  2. It allows users to link or interact with other users
  3. It allows users to post material
  4. Material is accessible or delivered to users in Australia

Currently, the platforms banned are: 

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Threads
  • Snapchat
  • TikTok
  • X
  • YouTube
  • Threads
  • Reddit
  • Kick
  • Twitch
Children under 16 will be banned from select social media platforms from December 10.
Children under 16 will be banned from select social media platforms from December 10. (Getty)

What platforms are not banned? 

The platforms that are exempt are: 

  • Discord
  • GitHub
  • Google Classroom
  • LEGO Play
  • Messenger
  • Pinterest
  • Roblox
  • Steam and Steam Chat
  • WhatsApp
  • YouTube Kids

But Wells has warned that Yope, Lemon8 and even LinkedIn may be added to the ban.

The eSafety Commission will assess which platforms children move to after today and will decide whether to expand the scope of the ban.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like
One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson slaps herself on the wrist.

Pauline Hanson Exits Parliamentary Session in Protest Following Censure Decision

One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson has slapped her wrist and stormed out…

Smaller Cities Surpass Sydney and Melbourne in Housing Market Growth: A New Real Estate Trend Emerges

In Brief Home values in Sydney and Melbourne have flatlined so far…
A man who insists his kitchen is 'basically a grocery store' has been left scratching his head after his girlfriend claimed there was 'never anything to eat' at his house

Thousands Criticize Boyfriend’s Fridge for Unusual Reason Following Girlfriend’s Hunger Complaint

A man, convinced his kitchen rivals a grocery store, found himself puzzled…
Cyclone risk increases as multiple lows bring further drenching to the north

Heightened Cyclone Threat: Multiple Low-Pressure Systems Intensify Northern Deluge

Forecasters are watching four tropical lows developing north of the continent that…
Trump may have eye on superpower summit in timeline for defeating Iran

Trump Considers Superpower Summit in Strategy to Address Iran Tensions

U.S. President Donald Trump might be considering his forthcoming visit to China…

Strikes Target Iranian City of Fabia’s Roots, Prompting Wave of Messages

As the first missiles began landing in her Iranian hometown, Fariba Willison…
Young mum accused of killing son in Gold Coast crash to stay in custody

Gold Coast Mother Faces Custody in Tragic Crash Involving Son

Aneshia Daisy Case, 23, was absent from the Brisbane Magistrates Court today…

Experts Question Legality of Recent Israeli-US Strikes on Iran Under International Law

The government is under scrutiny for not openly evaluating the legality of…

Trump Announces Swift Progress in Iran Operation Amid Tragic Loss of Three US Troops

In the aftermath of the recent joint military operations by the United…
A prominent businessman's appeal against a legal‑costs order from a previously private family dispute with his DJ ex has backfired - forcing the case into open court and allowing both parties to be named for the first time. (Pictured: Matthew Pringle and Olivia Nervo)

Prominent Figures Revealed in High-Profile Family Dispute: Noted DJ and Business Mogul’s Case Goes Public, Potentially Impacting His Fortune

A high-profile businessman’s attempt to overturn a legal-costs ruling from a past…

Who’s in charge of Iran, and what is the process for selecting a new Supreme Leader?

The 36-year tenure of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the autocratic leader of Iran,…

Is Your Wallet at Risk? Uncover the War’s Impact on Gas Prices and Home Loans

In Brief Ripple effects of the war in Iran will be felt…