ORLANDO, Fla. – Florida’s Amendment 3 is drawing sharply divided reactions across the state.
For some homeowners, the proposal represents a long-awaited chance to lower their property tax burden and keep more money at home.
“That’s thousands of dollars in my pocket going toward my family, going toward my kids,” one homeowner told News 6.
But many local officials are sounding alarms, warning that the same tax relief could come at a steep cost to public services.
“It’s a train wreck,” Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said. “It doesn’t look anything like what Gov. DeSantis sent over.”
[RELATED: Florida Sheriff Grady Judd rails against new state property tax proposal]
That leaves Florida voters with a complicated question: Is Amendment 3 meaningful tax relief for families, or would it weaken the local services those families depend on every day? To get a clearer picture, News 6 examined Seminole County’s financial numbers — with a large cheese pizza helping explain the math.
Amendment 3 will appear on the ballot for Florida voters on Nov. 3. Like all proposed constitutional amendments in the state, it must receive at least 60% voter approval to become law.
If it does, the homestead exemption on your primary residence would climb from about $50,000 today to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028 — meaning a larger share of your home’s value would be shielded from property taxes.
But there’s a catch, the bigger exemption applies only to non-school taxes. The portion of your bill that funds schools stays exactly the same.
The amendment would also tighten the annual cap on assessment increases for non-homestead property — second homes, rentals and commercial buildings — from 10% down to 5%.
It’s already been a fight. A Leon County judge ruled the original ballot wording misleading, and the state rewrote it in August; voters will now see it titled “Increased Homestead Exemption; Lower Cap on Increases in Non-Homestead Property Assessments.” Gov. Ron DeSantis, who pushed for the property tax relief, has distanced himself from the version the Legislature ultimately sent to the ballot.
[RELATED: New language revealed for Florida’s property tax proposal]
“I don’t think you’re going to see me leading on this particular proposal, because while I support it, I do think it’s not all that I was hoping to see,” Desantis said at a recent press conference.
DeSantis also took to social media to highlight the differences between his plan and theirs.
“The Legislature’s measure is different from my proposal in significant respects (i.e. it doesn’t provide for the elimination of taxes on homesteads and it doesn’t create a fund to provide state grants to local governments to assist with core services as homestead taxes are phased out),” Desantis wrote.
Uh, the Legislature put a measure on the ballot. It wasn’t “signed” by me because it does not require the approval of the governor per the Florida Constitution.
In fact, the Legislature’s measure is different from my proposal in significant respects (ie, it doesn’t provide for… https://t.co/GLilr7af0U
— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) June 7, 2026
The savings are real. For a Seminole County homeowner with a house worth more than $250,000, Amendment 3 would mean about $1,912 a year back in their pocket, according to the Seminole County Property Appraiser’s office.
But that money has to come from somewhere — and where it comes from is local budgets.
“The ones that are really going to get devastated are going to be the cities, like Oviedo and Winter Springs here in Seminole County,” Property Appraiser J.R. Kroll said. “They will not be able to afford a police force anymore, or the fire, because it’s just too big of a cut.”
Seminole County leaders estimate Seminole County alone would lose roughly $188 million in the first two years.
And unlike a normal budget line, this one is nearly impossible to walk back.
“You have that genie out of the bottle, it’s out, and in order to get it back, we would have to have another 60% vote to say, ‘Yes, please tax us more,’” Kroll said.
Here’s how it all breaks down. Picture your entire property tax bill as one pizza.
The first half or so — depending on your county — goes straight to schools. Amendment 3 doesn’t touch that half. You’ll keep paying it either way.
The other half is what’s at stake. And within that half, the priorities aren’t equal:
About 70% funds public safety in Seminole County— police, fire and EMS. Those services get first claim on the money. But “first claim” isn’t a guarantee.
The remaining 30% is where the toughest choices land. This is the slice that covers public transit, parks and libraries — and it’s the piece most likely to get eaten first.
But even if Amendment 3 passes, your savings may not survive.
Many local governments are already weighing new fees and higher millage rates to cover the gap the amendment would open up.
New Smyrna Beach, Sanford, Ocoee, Deltona, and St. Cloud have all considered new fees.
Cape Canaveral and Apopka have proposed property tax increases.
Those moves could cannibalize the very savings the amendment promises. This could leave homeowners with a smaller break than the sticker number suggests.
Voters decide Nov. 3.