Peter Dutton has called for an apology from the Prime Minister and one of his ministers after being twice accused of “protecting paedophiles.”

Clare O’Neil, the Home Affairs Minister under fire, first pointed fingers at Mr. Dutton during a parliamentary session on Wednesday, labeling him a “protector of paedophiles” in the midst of the government’s asylum seeker controversy.

On Thursday, when Sports Minister Anika Wells appeared on the Today show, she was asked if she agreed that the Opposition Leader was a “protector of paedophiles.” Her response was a straightforward, “Yes.”

In the same interview, Wells attributed the ongoing “mess” to the period when Peter Dutton held the position of Home Affairs Minister.

Dutton, who has a background as a police officer and has been vocal about child safety issues, stated that such remarks indicate that the government is “really getting desperate.”

“I have arrested sex offenders in the past. Ensuring the safety of women and children is one of my life’s passions. I feel very sincerely and deeply about it,” Dutton affirmed.

‘Yes the comments hurt, but they don’t mean anything to me because I know who I am. 

‘I think I am owed an apology from Anika Wells and the Prime Minister.’ 

‘The most frustrating part is the government has made the decision to release the other 140 or so into the community when they didn’t need to.

Approval ratings for Mr Albanese and his cabinet are on the slide and Labor is now polling 50:50 with the Opposition on a two-party preferred basis, according to the latest Newspoll.

Mr Dutton, a former cop who has long been an outspoken advocate for child safety , lashed the comments and said they indicated the government is ‘really getting desperate’ 

And in an attempt to shift the blame of the High Court debacle which saw 141 asylum seekers released from indefinite detention into the community, several ministers have sought to link Mr Dutton to the case which sparked it all.

On November 8, the High Court found the indefinite detention of paedophile rapist NZYQ, a Rohingya asylum seeker, was unconstitutional, prompting the Labor government to release dozens of asylum seekers.

Mr Dutton said on Thursday that NZYQ was the only detainee who needed to be released after the decision, and that the government pre-emptively released the remaining 140 people when it did not need to. 

‘The government completely botched this,’ he told Ray Hadley on 2GB radio.

‘The government itself has made a decision in relation to the other 140-odd (asylum seekers) when there was no need to do so. 

‘No wonder they’re panicking. This is a complete and utter disaster.’

Embattled Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neil (pictured) first cast the aspersion on Mr Dutton on Wednesday and it was reiterated on live breakfast television by Sports Minister Anika Wells on Thursday.

For weeks now the government has been under fire for not having draft legislation in place ahead of the decision to deal with the potential fallout of the High Court case.

The government was forced to accept a number of amendments to the legislation to fit released asylum seeker criminals with electronic ankle monitors and subject them to a curfew.

 Ms O’Neil used parliamentary privilege in the House of Representatives on Wednesday to claim Mr Dutton was protecting paedophiles because he refused to support a motion which included punishing child sex criminals caught within a certain distance of schools.

She also claimed he was a child sex offender apologist after one of his frontbenchers, Senator Dean Smith, campaigned Immigration Minister Andrew Giles to have a convicted sex offender released into the community.

In a letter to Mr Giles, Senator Smith noted the offender, whose visa was cancelled on the back of his convictions, had sex with a girl who was aged between 13 and 16. The refugee was 21 at the time of his offending.

Speaking to 2GB’s Ray Hadley after the allegations were levelled against him, Mr Dutton said it was the ‘complete opposite of the truth’, admitting that ‘of course’ he was impacted by it.

‘I think the government’s showing now, it’s really getting desperate,’ he said.

‘He (PM) hasn’t had the guts to say what he’s sent out the ministers to say.’

Mr Dutton said the Coalition voted against the proposed bill on Monday because they had tried to argue for tighter restrictions which weren’t included. 

‘The personal attacks – yes they hurt. But they don’t mean anything to me. It’s the complete opposite of who I am and what I believe… This is a desperate Prime Minister running out of options,’ he said.