The FBI’s decision to compile a list of allegations associated with former President Trump last year remains shrouded in mystery. The reasoning behind the creation of such a list has yet to be clarified by officials. However, it has sparked considerable public interest and speculation.

Notably, Trump has consistently refuted any claims of misconduct linked to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. Despite this, the documents in question include a multitude of more than a dozen allegations that draw attention to various claims made over time.

Within these documents, an internal note from an official highlights the process of sorting the allegations, stating, “Yellow highlighting is for the salacious piece.” This suggests a methodical approach to categorizing the information based on its nature or potential impact.

Intriguingly, two versions of this document were temporarily removed from the Department of Justice’s website last Friday afternoon. This sudden disappearance raised eyebrows, although both versions were subsequently restored without any noticeable alterations.

An official from the DOJ clarified that the document’s brief absence was due to an “overload” issue and assured that it was promptly returned online once resolved. This explanation, while technical, does little to quell the curiosity surrounding the timing and content of the files.

A DOJ official said the document was down “due to overload” and was back online.

The allegations appear to be unverified, and the officials note that some are secondhand information.

The document notes that in many instances, there was no contact made with the individuals who sent in the allegations, or no contact information was provided.

Some of the allegations were followed up on.

“Was there anything in the file re follow up with the below individuals? 302s. etc?” one official writes.

“As everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the Act.

“Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election.

“To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponised against President Trump already.”

NEVER MISS A STORY: Get your breaking news and exclusive stories first by following us across all platforms.