Netanyahu Calls on Iranians to Stand Against Their Government: Could Israeli Action Bring Change?

Share this @internewscast.com

Several hours following the commencement of Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites and defense systems, Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, issued a direct message to the citizens of Iran.

“The Islamic regime, which has suppressed you for nearly five decades, poses a threat to wipe out our nation, Israel,” Netanyahu stated.

He explained that Israel’s goal was to neutralize the nuclear and missile dangers, but also mentioned: “While we secure our goal, we are also paving the way for you to attain your freedom.”

“The government is clueless about the impact and what is yet to come. It is at its weakest. Now is your chance to rise and voice your demands,” Netanyahu encouraged.

Three days of strikes between Iran and Israel have left dozens dead in both countries, as both sides warn of further attacks. Israel’s attack targeted senior figures in Iran’s military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country’s air defence system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran’s nuclear site.

The scale of Israel’s attacks, its choice of targets, and its politicians’ own words suggest Israel’s ambition could be to topple the regime itself.

“One assumes that one of the reasons that Israel is doing that is that they’re hoping to see regime change,” said Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior official under former president George W Bush.

He expressed hope for an uprising among the Iranian populace, noting that the limited non-military casualties in the first phase of attacks pointed to broader intentions.

Thick black plumes of smoke and fire rising out of a building flanked by high-rises.

Footage from central Tel Aviv showed fire and smoke rising from a condo tower. Source: AP / Tomer Neuberg

The Israeli embassy in Washington insisted: “The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people.”

“As a nation that values democracy, Israel believes it is the right of a country’s people to determine their political future and select their leaders,” the embassy informed Reuters.

‘Chance of a popular revolt’

Despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity toward Israel, it’s unclear whether the Iranian people would follow Netanyahu’s call.

The strikes early on Friday hit not just Iran’s nuclear facilities and missile factories but also key figures in the country’s military chain of command and its nuclear scientists, blows that appear aimed at diminishing Iran’s credibility both at home and among its allies in the region — factors that could destabilise the Iranian leadership, experts said.

But Singh cautioned no-one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to merge in Iran.

Shahram Akbarzadeh, director of Deakin University’s Middle East forum, told SBS News Iranians who have long been unhappy with the conservative Islamic Republic leadership could rise up.

“There is a chance of popular revolt and discontent in the country in protest to the deteriorating, fast deteriorating state of affairs in Iran, with leaders being killed,” he said.

“People are unhappy about not just the economic decline that’s likely to come, but also the fact that they believe Iran doesn’t need the war with Israel.”

Akbarzadeh said there will be many voices in Iran arguing it should pursue the development of a nuclear bomb, to act in part as a deterrent to Israel attacking it.

Many of Iran’s 90 million people are unhappy with the country’s weak economy, a lack of freedom of speech, women’s rights, and minority rights.

The unrest in 2022, known as the “Woman Life Freedom” movement, spread across most of Iran but failed to establish a major, lasting political opposition in the country.

Jessica Genauer, senior lecturer in international relations at Flinders University, told SBS News Israel views the escalation as an opportunity to further degrade a weakened Iran and potentially precipitate regime change.

Those amongst Israel’s nationalist right-wing coalition government consider this as Israel’s best chance to escalate into a more direct war with Iran, she said.

“That might go on for some time until they actually see regime change in Iran,” Genauer said.

“If that were to actually take place and if regime change in Iran is actually the end goal of the current Israeli government, then I would say we are looking at escalation of this current phase of direct conflict in the medium to long-term, over the coming months.”

Paramedics wearing helmets carry a stretcher through debris.

Israeli authorities said dozens were injured in Iran’s retaliatory strikes on Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Source: Getty / picture alliance/dpa

Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran’s government, including in September.

The United States government has given no indication it seeks regime change in Iran.

Toppling Iran regime could be risky

While setting back Tehran’s nuclear program would have value for Israel, the hope for undermining the regime could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos, experts say.

Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, said: “These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime.”

“In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that,” she said.

People looking through the rubble of buildings which have been badly damaged.

Iranian people look over damage to buildings following Israeli airstrikes in Tehran. Source: Getty / Majid Saeedi

But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former US deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now the director of a Middle East security initiative at the Atlantic Council.

If Israel succeeds in removing Iran’s leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hardline in pursuit of conflict with Israel, he said.

“For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day – that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime.

“But history tells us it can always be worse.”