Prince Harry adopted a defiant stance while testifying in his legal battle against the publisher of the Daily Mail. He refuted claims suggesting he had cozy relationships with royal correspondents or that his companions leaked stories about him to the tabloids.
During the proceedings, Harry firmly stated, “My social circles were not leaky,” as he engaged in the final round of his confrontation with the British tabloid media.
His terse responses during cross-examination and attempts to describe his experience of living under what he termed “24-hour surveillance” prompted the judge to step in, advising him to refrain from debating with the defense attorney.
Justice Matthew Nicklin addressed the agitated prince, saying, “You don’t have to bear the burden of arguing the case today.”
Harry, alongside seven other high-profile individuals like Elton John and actress Elizabeth Hurley, claims that Associated Newspapers Ltd breached their privacy by conducting a “clear, systematic and sustained use of unlawful information gathering” over two decades, according to their attorney, David Sherborne.
Associated Newspapers Ltd has dismissed these accusations, labeling them as absurd. They argue that the approximately 50 articles under scrutiny were based on legitimate sources, including insiders willing to divulge information about their celebrity friends.
Harry says he was ‘paranoid beyond belief’
Harry said in his 23-page witness statement that he was distressed and disturbed by the intrusion into his early life by the Mail and its sister publication the Mail on Sunday, and it made him “paranoid beyond belief”.
Under the English civil court system, witnesses present written testimony, and after asserting that it’s the truth are immediately put under cross-examination.
Harry, dressed in a dark suit, held a small Bible in his right hand in London’s High Court and swore to “almighty God that the evidence I shall give will be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”. After the Duke of Sussex said he preferred to be called Prince Harry, he acknowledged that his 23-page statement was authentic and accurate.
Defence lawyer Antony White, in a calm and gentle tone, began to put questions to Harry to determine if the sourcing of the articles, in fact, had come from royal correspondents working their sources at official events or from friends or associates of the prince.
As a soft-spoken Harry became increasingly defensive, White said: “I am intent on you not having a bad experience with me, but it is my job to ask you these questions.”
Harry suggested that information had come from eavesdropping on his phone calls or having private investigators snoop on him. He said journalist Katie Nicholl had the luxury to use the term “unidentified source” deceptively to hide unlawful measures of investigation.
“If you complain, they double down on you in my experience,” he said in explaining why he had not objected to the articles at the time.
For decades, Harry has had what he called an “uneasy” relationship with the media, but kept mum and followed the family protocol of “never complain, never explain,” he said.
Articles about Meghan pushed him to sue
The litigation is part of Harry’s self-proclaimed mission to reform the media that he blames for the death of his mother, Princess Diana, who was killed in a car crash in 1997 while being pursued by paparazzi in Paris.
He also said persistent press attacks on his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, led them to leave royal life and move to the United States in 2020.
He said “vicious persistent attacks,” harassment and even racist articles about Meghan, who is biracial, had inspired him to break from family tradition to finally sue the press.
It is Harry’s second time testifying after he bucked House of Windsor tradition and became the first senior royal to testify in a court in more than a century when he took the stand in his similar lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily Mirror in 2023.
The trial is expected to last nine weeks and a written verdict could come months later.
