Jim Chalmers Doesn’t Dismiss Potential Major Changes for Property Owners

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has suggested the possibility of altering tax advantages for investor landlords, following requests from trade unions to limit negative gearing.

ACTU secretary Sally McManus, an attendee of the government’s Economic Reform Roundtable, has suggested that negative gearing and the 50 percent capital gains tax discount should only apply to a single investment property.

Under her proposal, arrangements for existing investors would be grandfathered for five years before new restrictions were introduced.

‘You can have as many investment properties as you want but in terms of the tax benefit, limit that to one,’ she told ABC Insiders on Sunday.

“If we don’t make changes, working individuals won’t be able to live near their jobs, or in the communities where they were raised, leading to significant stress,” she stated.

On Wednesday, Chalmers did not dismiss the idea of restricting negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s previous decision not to alter these policies after Labor’s 2019 election defeat.

Chalmers mentioned, “I’ve aimed to be open-minded, not just with the ACTU’s proposals but more broadly, and avoid dismissing concepts prematurely before discussions are held,” he said in Canberra.

‘I want people to feel like their contributions are valued because they are.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has indicated a willingness to consider changes to tax incentives for landlords, following union demands to limit negative gearing.

‘Firstly, when it comes to those areas, the government hasn’t changed its policies or its positions on those areas.’

Ms McManus rebuffed a suggestion reforming negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount would amount to a broken promise, given Albanese won the 2022 election by scrapping his Labor predecessor’s policies.

‘I just say that we’ve got to bite the bullet, like, otherwise we’re just saying “too bad young people, you’re not going to be able to ever own a home, forget even thinking about it”,’ she said.

‘Since 2019, the problem’s just got worse, it’s going to continue to get worse unless the government’s brave enough to do something about it.

‘We are just abandoning those generations and we think that’s fundamentally wrong.’

Australia’s median capital city house price of $1.045million is so expensive that someone with a 20 per cent mortgage deposit would now have to earn $161,000 a year just to get a mortgage.

That is significantly more than the average, full-time salary of $102,742, which means only high-income earners or a dual-income couple can afford a house in a big city.

Labor under former leader Bill Shorten lost the 2016 and 2019 elections with a plan to restrict negative gearing to just future purchases of brand new properties and halve the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to 25 per cent.

ACTU secretary Sally McManus, a participant in the government’s Economic Reform Roundtable, has called for negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount to be restricted to one investment property

Since September 1999, an investor who made a $100,000 capital gain on a property would only have to add $50,000 to their taxable income for that financial year. 

The Greens have a similar position to the ACTU, in that they want negative gearing and the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount restricted to one investment property.

Since July 2024, the federal government and the states have had a plan to build 1.2million homes over five years, hoping that will boost housing supply and address affordability issues.

Real estate data group Cotality, however, noted Australia hadn’t built more than a million homes over a similar time frame since the five years to 2019.

Cotality Australia’s head of research Eliza Owen said that period coincided with quality issues in new apartments, especially in Sydney.

‘While a lot of new dwellings were completed, this did not necessarily lead to good housing outcomes – capital growth outcomes for investors have generally been very poor for 2010s apartments and defects were so rife that some new dwellings could not even be lived in,’ she said.

She added that building companies would be unlikely to be able to build more homes, even with government targets. 

‘While state and local governments focus on approvals and improving the feasibility of new projects, building companies continue to be stretched thin across an already swollen pipeline and reduced margins,’ she said.

Australia’s median capital city house price of $1.045million is so expensive that someone with a 20 per cent mortgage deposit would now have to earn $161,000 a year just to get a mortgage (pictured is a Sydney auction)