5.9k Share this

President Joe Biden’s nominee to replace Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, was accused of judicial “activism” for a ruling where she halted quick deportations for newly arrived illegal aliens despite federal law.

During the third day of confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) accused Jackson of “activism” in her role as a judge on the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (D.C.).

In the case, the George Soros-linked Make the Road New York sued former President Trump’s administration for its expanded expedited deportation of illegal aliens who had not resided in the U.S. for more than two years.

The federal statute states that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has “sole and unreviewable discretion” to carry out the policy of expedited deportation.

Jackson issued a preliminary injunction to halt the policy on the grounds that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and did not sufficiently weigh the impact that the policy would have on illegal aliens.

“That, to me, is exhibit A of activism,” Graham said. “… you’re not convincing me that it is anything other than activism.”

“For those of us in the law writing business, I don’t know how you could tell a judge more clearly that the administration, the agency in question, has discretion to do certain things within the statute,” Graham said:

So this is an example to me, and you may not agree, where the plain language of the statute was completely wiped out by you. You reached a conclusion because you disagreed with the Trump administration. [Emphasis added]

Graham also noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed Jackson’s ruling, stating that she exceeded her legal authority because the statute left this matter to the discretion of DHS and did not empower a federal judge to override that judgment.

“There could hardly be a more definitive expression of congressional intent to leave the decision about the scope of expedited removal, within statutory bounds, to the Secretary’s independent judgment,” the court stated. “The ‘forceful phrase ‘sole and unreviewable discretion,’ by its exceptional terms.”

Readers can watch day three of Jackson’s confirmation hearing here.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at [email protected] Follow him on Twitter here

Source: Breitbart

5.9k Share this
You May Also Like

‘Tucker Carlson Should Be Arrested and Tried for Sedition’

Bette Midler, star of Disney’s upcoming Hocus Pocus 2, routinely doles out left-wing…

Huge fire breaks out at Geneva Airport as building near runway ‘explodes’ 

Huge fire breaks out at Geneva Airport as reception centre for asylum…

Dow Jones Industrial Average On Longest Losing Streak Since 1932

After a promising start to morning trading, the major stock indexes turned…

Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall lay wreath at the National War Memorial

Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall were met by a small group…

CHRISTOPHER STEVENS: Stop wasting food or you’ll be sent to the chest freezer of doom 

Eat Well For Less? Rating: Secret Spenders: Beat the Price Rises Rating:…

I Expect Biden Admin. Will Find ‘Crafty’ Ways to Work Around Title 42 Ruling

On Friday’s broadcast of the Fox Business Network’s “Evening Edit,” Rep. Kat…

‘Lethal’ drug 10,000 times stronger than morphine available on the dark web

‘Lethal’ drug 10,000 times stronger than morphine available from dozens of suppliers…

Oklahoma passes nation’s most restrictive abortion bill banning terminations from FERTILIZATION

Oklahoma has passed the most restrictive abortion law in the United States…