Share this @internewscast.com

Key Points

  • In a 6-3 decision, the justices ruled that the law at issue did not grant Trump the power he claimed to impose tariffs.
  • Trump has vowed to pursue tariffs through other legal authorities.

President Donald Trump expressed intense disapproval following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision that he lacks the authority to impose tariffs on imports unilaterally. He criticized the justices individually and pledged to utilize other legislation to continue his international trade strategies.

The Supreme Court’s significant 6-3 decision on Friday disrupted the influence Trump and his trade representatives previously exerted over both allied and adversarial nations during negotiations aimed at altering diplomatic ties and global market dynamics.

This ruling cast doubt on numerous trade agreements brokered by his team recently, which were negotiated under the looming threat of steep tariffs.

The decision also propelled all three major U.S. stock indexes to their highest points in weeks. It further raised questions about the future of the $175 billion Trump accumulated from U.S. importers due to what the court identified as a misinterpretation of the law.

“I’m deeply disappointed in certain court members, utterly disappointed for failing to do what’s best for our nation,” Trump declared to reporters at the White House, asserting that foreign nations were celebrating the verdict and “rejoicing openly.”

He suggested, without offering proof, that corruption influenced the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts: “Their actions are very unpatriotic and betray our Constitution. I believe the court has been influenced by foreign interests and a political agenda far less significant than anyone could imagine.”

Since returning to the White House 13 months ago, Trump has said he had what the court summarised as the “extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope.”

Citing a national emergency, he said the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) meant he could set tariffs at any rate he chose.

The court’s ruling was blunt: Trump has not proved that the president has this power, and exceeded his authority. A tariff levied on US importers is a tax ‌like any other, the court said, and the Constitution reserves the power to “lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises” to Congress.

In response, an angry Trump said he would invoke other laws to collect tariffs, and announced a blanket 10 per cent tariff on imports from all other countries, on top of any existing non-IEEPA tariff.

Donald Trump, with a stern expression on his face.
Donald Trump accused Supreme Court judges of being “swayed by foreign interests”. Source: AAP / ABACAPRESS.COM / Sipa USA / Yuri Gripas

In doing so, he became the first president to invoke Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, in which Congress said the president could levy tariffs of up to 15 per cent for up to 150 days to fix “fundamental ⁠international payments problems”.


For the latest from SBS News, download our app and subscribe to our newsletter.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Police Fatally Shoot Man in Potts Point After Alleged Assault on Two Women

Key Points Investigations have been launched into both incidents. Both incidents came…

Australia Unveils Significant Visa Fee Hike to $2,300: Everything You Need to Know About the Latest Changes

The Australian government has announced a significant increase in application fees for…

South Sudan Tragedy: Attack Claims 169 Lives, 90 Civilians Among Victims

In brief Death toll from an attack by a group of unidentified…
Mackay arson attack on tobacconist

Clumsy Arsonists Nearly Ignite Themselves During Failed Firebomb Attempt

A pair of fumbling firebombers have nearly set themselves on fire in…

Iran’s Alarming Nuclear Warning Sparks US Concerns: What You Need to Know

Israel has initiated a strategic deployment of troops into southern Lebanon, marking…
A glitch at an Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centre in the US left millions around the world unable to access half the internet, but how exactly did it cause the widespread disruption?

Amazon Services Disrupted in Middle East Amid Facility Strikes: Impact on E-commerce and Delivery

Several Amazon Web Services are down in the Middle East after three…
structures in Iran being struck by missiles

Iran Mourns Tragic Loss: Mass Graves and Thousands Gather to Honor 168 Children Allegedly Killed in US-Israel Strike

As the war in the Middle East intensifies, US President Donald Trump…
Victorian work from home laws

Victoria’s New Work-From-Home Laws: What You Need to Know

The Victorian government is pushing ahead with its work-from-home laws, meaning millions…

Pauline Hanson Faces Censure for Controversial Comments on Muslim Community

IN BRIEF The censure motion passed with Labor and Greens’ backing, but…

Beware Fuel Price Manipulation: Treasurer Cracks Down on Petrol Price Gouging

Key Points Jim Chalmers says retailers should not use conflict to “gouge”…
Diners flee Dubai restaurant after mistaking Ramadan cannon for bomb blast

Dubai Diners Mistake Ramadan Cannon for Explosion, Sparking Momentary Panic

A Ramadan cannon blast at sunset was mistaken for a bomb blast…

Australians Seek Unity Amid Deep National Divisions

Social cohesion in Australia is facing significant challenges, with recent surveys indicating…