SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Knicks Defend Taylor Swift After Players Call Her Fakest Fan

The defending NBA champion New York Knicks have come to Taylor Swift’s…

Paraguay President Santiago Peña Investigated Over Bank Collapse, Faces Possible Removal from Office

ASUNCIÓN, Paraguay — Paraguayan President Santiago Peña is facing a criminal investigation…

Trump Says Susie Wiles Is Out as White House Chief of Staff

Donald Trump has announced that Stephen Miller, his senior adviser and current…

Thomas Markle Complaint Uncovers Two Additional Los Angeles Storage Units

The FBI has found photographs allegedly showing Thomas Markle sexually abusing children…

Judge Told Rape Victim It Would Be ‘Unfair’ to Name Her Attacker

A Canadian judge has faced criticism after telling a sexual-assault survivor that…

LA Peacemaker Clifford Townsend Avoids Charge in Alleged Murder Plot

A former Los Angeles gang member who later became a prominent violence-prevention…

Trump Aide Stephen Miller Delivers Fiery Chief of Staff Debut

Stephen Miller pledged “unwavering commitment and total devotion” to Donald Trump’s success…

Labour’s Uber-Style Rail Pricing Plans Could Push Fares Sharply Higher

Rail passengers could face higher fares from 2027 after Labour appeared to…

Funeral Director Horrified as Part of Corpse Is Allegedly Removed

A Logan funeral director with three decades of experience has been left…

Albanese Doubles Down on Caribbean Trip Amid Mortgage Pain

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has defended his Caribbean trip for a Commonwealth…

Congresswoman-Elect Due in Court Over Alleged Rental Car Theft After Win

Newly elected Democratic Congresswoman LaKesha Womack has endured an extraordinary week, defeating…

Nate Silver Says He Suspects Trump Could Leave the White House Early

Election analyst Nate Silver has suggested that Donald Trump could leave office…