SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Fisherman Rescued From Under Boulder Says Siri Helped Him Call 911

A solo fisherman trapped beneath a huge boulder was rescued after using…

Dual British-Iranian National Arrested Over Alleged Plot Targeting RAF Fairford

A 27-year-old British-Iranian man has been arrested on suspicion of preparing terrorist…

Internal Poll Shows GOP Rep. Lawler Leading Democrat Cait Conley

Rep. Mike Lawler, a Hudson Valley Republican, holds a narrow three-point advantage…

Why White House Staffers Are Leaving Before the Midterms

Some officials are moving into Washington consulting firms, while others are seeking…

Prince Harry Makes Surprise Appearance at London Gala

Prince Harry made a surprise appearance at a black-tie gala supporting Ukraine…

World’s Best Airlines for In-Flight Wi-Fi Revealed, With Only One British Carrier Making the List

In-flight Wi-Fi has become a regular feature for many travellers, as airlines…

Christa Pike: Inside the Tennessee Killer’s Death Penalty Case

The execution was expected to take about 30 minutes. By the end…

Taylor Swift Reveals Key Creative Decision Behind Patient Zero Video

At first glance, the property looks less like a luxury home and…

House of Horrors Serial Killer Suspect’s Manifesto Details Woke Views

Raymond “RC” Horsch, the alleged serial killer linked to the disappearance of…

Saudi Arabia and Jordan Denied flydubai Clearance After Mayday

Saudi Arabia and Jordan initially refused landing clearance to a flydubai flight…

New Study Reveals Why Earth’s Days Are Getting Shorter Each Year

Earth’s day length has subtly shifted over the past several decades, according…

Man Sentenced for Slashing Ex-Girlfriend’s Throat Erupts in Court After Meltdown

A New York City man accused of stabbing his former girlfriend more…