SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Kristin Cavallari Says Her Children Fly Coach While She Travels First Class

Kristin Cavallari has shared that, on family flights, her three children travel…

Youth Pastor Left Disturbing Note After Charge in Wife’s Cliff Death

A former youth pastor accused of shoving his wife off a steep…

NY Mom Jamey Carney Suffocated in Ireland Home Before Suspect Ahmad Alsaqer Fled, Officials Say

A New York mother allegedly slain by her asylum-seeking boyfriend in her…

Prince Harry, Meghan and Their Children Hold Private Reunion With the King and Queen

The King was reunited with his grandchildren, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet,…

Millions Could Miss British Wildcard Arthur Fery’s Wimbledon Semi-Final

Millions of tennis supporters could miss British wildcard Arthur Fery’s landmark Wimbledon…

Influencer Model Dies After 27th-Floor Fall From Dubai Skyscraper

Brazilian influencer Kauana Bilhar has died after falling from the 27th floor…

Graham Platner Drops Out of Maine Senate Race With Scathing Letter

Embattled Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner has formally filed paperwork to end…

Wife Clung to Husband to Keep Him From Being Pulled Through Plane Window

The wife of a passenger who was reportedly dragged toward a broken…

Fresh Iran Assassination Plot Targeting Trump Reported Amid Supreme Leader Mourning

U.S. officials have reportedly been briefed on a fresh Iranian plan to…

Megyn Kelly Says Love May Have Undermined Robinson’s Claim of Innocence

Megyn Kelly said she believes testimony involving Tyler Robinson’s transgender partner, Lance…

New Trump UFO Files Reveal Eerie Video of Six-Pointed Object as Alien Evidence Remains Unconfirmed

The Pentagon on Friday made public its fourth tranche of UFO-related records…

Husband’s 911 Call Captures Moment He Found Therapist Wife Dead

The husband of Brooke Haggerty Hanlon, a 35-year-old psychotherapist and new mother…