SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Fans of Karmelo Anthony Spark Backlash With Dance Mocking Austin Metcalf’s Death

Supporters of Karmelo Anthony have sparked a troubling social media craze that…

Australia Confirms Its First Human Case of Deadly Bird Flu

Australia has recorded its first confirmed case of the deadly H5N1 bird…

3-Year-Old Boy Reportedly Attacked by Crocodile After Disabled Man Allegedly Threw Him Into Water

A three-year-old boy was attacked by at least one crocodile after a…

Jerry Hall Invites Mick Jagger to Her 70th Birthday Party

Jerry Hall — described as “sublime” in this month’s issue of fashion…

Trump claims there are ‘no limits’ to his power in controversial post invoking Hitler

President Donald Trump said in an interview with Axios on Thursday that…

Newsom directed millions to nonprofits linked to his wife

California Gov. Gavin Newsom directed millions of dollars in donations to charities…

Trump Faults Vandals as Peeling Paint Mars Reflecting Pool

Donald Trump’s disputed overhaul of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool has hit…

Harry and Meghan Announce Britain Visit with Archie and Lilibet

After years of gap-toothed birthday portraits — smiling confidently in shorts as…

Beach Resort Fire Tragedy: 1 Dead, 1,700 Evacuated as Massive Blaze Sweeps Holiday Area

A massive blaze at a well-known Dominican Republic resort has left at…

Deidre Hall Playfully ‘Slaps’ Craig Melvin During Today Show Moment

Deidre Hall ‘slapped’ Craig Melvin during a live TV interview on the Today…

Major iPhone Security Breach Exposes Seven Models: Check If Your Device Is at Risk

Cybersecurity specialists say they have discovered a fresh vulnerability that could affect…

Ivanka Trump Shows Off Toned Figure in New Photo Series

Ivanka Trump is leaning into a more relaxed chapter of life, and…