SCOTUS Allows ICE to Keep Arresting Illegals in Sanctuary City Los Angeles

The United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has allowed President Donald Trump’s administration to bypass a lower court’s decision. This earlier ruling had prevented Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from conducting federal immigration enforcement activities, citing these actions as racial profiling.

In July, Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong was appointed to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California by then-President Joe Biden. She had stopped ICE from executing raids in the sanctuary area of Los Angeles, California.

Before the Trump administration sought SCOTUS’s intervention to let ICE persist in capturing illegal immigrants in Los Angeles during the legal proceedings, the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had supported Frimpong’s decision.

On Monday, Justice Kavanaugh, representing the conservative majority in a 6-3 decision, stated that “the government has adequately demonstrated the need for a stay while the appeal is pending.”

Justice Kavanaugh emphasized that “stopping individuals based on reasonable suspicions of unlawful presence has long played a critical role in U.S. immigration enforcement efforts for decades, spanning multiple presidential terms.” With the current rise in illegal immigration under Biden, ICE’s attention on Los Angeles appears justified.

Kavanaugh further noted, “Individuals in the country illegally seeking to avoid law enforcement questioning are essentially aiming to bypass the law, which does not constitute a significant legal interest.”

Meanwhile, Justice Sotomayor, in writing a dissenting opinion that Justices Kagan and Jackson joined, called the court’s stay on the lower court’s decision “yet another grave misuse of our emergency docket.”

“We should not have to live in a country where the Government can seize anyone who looks Latino, speaks Spanish, and appears to work a low-wage job,” Sotomayor writes. “Rather than stand idly by while our constitutional freedoms are lost, I dissent.”

The case is Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo, No. 25A169 in the Supreme Court of the United States.

You May Also Like

Aaron Rodgers Criticizes Danica Patrick as Public Feud Escalates

Aaron Rodgers has made striking new remarks about former girlfriend Danica Patrick,…

Lindsay Clancy Juror Reveals Why Lone Holdout Made No Sense

The lone juror who blocked a unanimous decision in the Lindsay Clancy…

White House Distances Itself From Kristi Noem Associate Amid Investigation

Donald Trump’s White House is reportedly distancing itself from Corey Lewandowski, Kristi…

Andy Burnham’s Tourist Tax Plan Sparks Jobs Bloodbath Fears

Ministers are today setting out proposals for a sweeping new “tourist tax”…

Former ESPN Host Takes New Role in Trump Administration

Former ESPN reporter Britt McHenry has joined the Trump administration, taking on…

Hayden Panettiere’s Boyfriend Brian Hickerson Speaks With DEA

Brian Hickerson, Hayden Panettiere’s longtime on-and-off boyfriend, has reportedly spoken with federal…

Karoline Leavitt Swaps White House Podium for Campaign Combat

Karoline Leavitt, the former White House press secretary, returned to the political…

VIDEO: Shocking Trump-Putin Deal Talk: What’s Really Holding It Up?

In this eye-opening exchange, Trump discusses his recent conversation with President Putin,…

Gavin Newsom’s 2028 Presidential Odds Sink Sharply on Prediction Markets

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is increasingly looking like a 2028 presidential contender,…

Met Office Issues Autumn Flood Warning as Record El Niño Looms

Britain is facing a higher-than-usual chance of a wetter autumn, with forecasters…

Influencers Face Rising Assassination Threats After Kirk’s Murder

One year after Charlie Kirk was killed, several of the conservative influencers…

Cunningham Launches Solo Podcast After Trans Debate Rift

WNBA standout Sophie Cunningham has relaunched her podcast with a new name…