WASHINGTON — Renowned Democratic strategist James Carville recently shared candid reflections on some of his most significant misjudgments, acknowledging that even seasoned experts might not possess superior foresight compared to the general public.

In a revealing conversation with ESPN sports analyst Stephen A. Smith, aired during a Politicon video interview last week, Carville expressed skepticism about the reliability of expert predictions, especially in sports. “People often ask me, ‘Who’s going to win?’ and honestly, I don’t know,” Carville admitted.

Carville further confessed, “I’m not a very good predictor of elections,” highlighting a level of humility not always seen in political circles.

Carville is best known for his role as the chief strategist behind Bill Clinton’s successful 1992 presidential campaign, during which he became noted for his sharp and confident political commentary.

However, his confidence hasn’t always translated into accurate forecasting. In October 2024, Carville authored a now-notorious op-ed in the New York Times titled, “Three Reasons I’m Certain Kamala Harris Will Win” the presidential election. Contrary to his predictions, President Trump emerged victorious over Harris just days after the piece was published.

President Trump defeated Harris days later.

Carville also authored the 2009 book, “40 More Years: How the Democrats Will Rule the Next Generation.”

Democrats are currently out of power in the White House and both chambers of Congress.

The Dem luminary made a sports analogy to drive home his point about experts.

“The truth is, if I asked Bill Belichick who does he think is gonna win the Super Bowl, he knows more football than any of us know. But I don’t know if he can predict the outcome of the game any better,” Carville reflected.

Carville said he even misjudged Smith when he first began paying attention to the ESPN host, recalling how he originally predicted that the sportscaster was “gonna burn himself out.

“I was dead wrong. You came in hot. You stayed hot. You’re still hot. Your first broadcast is not 5% different than your last broadcast,” Carville said.

Smith, who previously courted 2028 presidential buzz, announced earlier this month that he will not throw his hat in the ring and named three potential contenders he could back: Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

“It’s not an expectation that you’re never going to be wrong,” Smith explained about expectations for pundits and experts.

“It’s an expectation that your opinion comes from an informed place. ‘This is what you believe, and here is why.’

“Whether it’s to agree or disagree with you, people are … seeking what to hear from your thoughts because they want to be smarter, they want to be validated as to what they believe or they want to be edified as to what they’re missing, and now they’re no longer missing it because of you,” Smith said.

The two pundits also analyzed the Democratic Party’s recent electoral struggles with young male voters, with Carville asking Smith to give Dems advice, given that he “might be the best person in the world communicating with young men.”

Smith replied, “Let’s speak the language of the average American citizen that’s out there trying to survive and feed their family every day.

“Let’s speak to those people as opposed to a portion of the LGBTQ+ community or woke culture or canceling somebody because they got a fact wrong or they said somebody’s name wrong.”