Israel committed to a ceasefire with Iran on June 23, 2025, brokered by U.S. President Donald Trump, but suspicions persist about its underlying goals. Matt Gaetz alleges Israel aims for regime change, not merely denuclearization.

Despite damaged nuclear sites, Israel’s prior airstrikes suggest a broader agenda. With both sides accusing each other of violations, including an Iranian missile strike in Beersheba, the ceasefire’s stability is uncertain.

Will Israel’s pursuit of regime change undermine this truce?

Matt Gaetz questions Israel’s motives in the Iran conflict, suggesting regime change benefits Israeli elites by destabilizing the region.

Follow: @NationalFile pic.twitter.com/GVOMZocsPO

— National File (@NationalFile) June 26, 2025

Matt Gaetz: We’ve mentioned before that our perspective is that Israel may not genuinely seek peace. Their objectives seemingly extend beyond just Iran denuclearizing. Even if, as Trump claims, critical nuclear facilities have been destroyed, one might wonder what Israel’s ongoing battles aim to achieve.

The goal, quite evidently, is regime change. We stated this from the outset. This is Israel’s primary focus—it isn’t about transforming Iran into another extensive nation-building endeavor like what happened in Iraq.

Israeli elites appear to believe that their position in global markets would be strengthened if regions like Dubai, Doha, Abu Dhabi, and Riyadh were to become overwhelmed with millions of war refugees.

They want these rich Muslim markets to look at skies full of missiles, not a future of opportunity. I think it’s that simple.

This is a gut-check moment for Israeli Prime Minister and perennial war advocate Bibi Netanyahu. Will he bend to Trump’s demands for peace? Or will he continue his air bombing campaign to decapitate the regime of Iran? Matt Gaetz, June 16, 2025

Gaetz’s claims of Israel’s regime change agenda gain traction, as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a Likud Party leader, aligns with the party’s historical “Greater Israel” ideology envisioning expanded territorial control.

The ceasefire, tested by missile exchanges, remains fragile. American citizens question whether the Israel-Iran ceasefire will hold if Israel pursues regime change to advance such ambitions.