In a mere seventeen days, Iran witnessed the brief tenure of its newest leader.

Ali Larijani assumed the role of the acting head of the authoritarian Islamic regime following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed by Israeli missile strikes from space on February 28.

Larijani met the same fate on Tuesday, perishing in a targeted assault that also claimed the life of the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ feared Basij militia.

These figures are among several hardline leaders eliminated since the conflict began, alongside the head of Iran’s National Defense Council, the commander of the IRGC, the defense minister, and the intelligence chief.

In the aftermath, Iran’s religious leaders appointed Mojtaba Khamenei, rumored to be “probably gay,” as the new supreme leader. However, he has remained out of the public eye since the attack that killed his father, wife, and son.

Even President Trump expressed uncertainty about Mojtaba’s status, questioning whether he is alive or dead.

All of this begs the question — who’s really running Iran? The answer, according to observers of the Islamic Republic appears, increasingly, to be hardline IRGC commanders, who are going to pick even more hardliners.

Just as Khamenei’s replacement was another Khamenei, Larijani’s replacement is likely to be another Larijani, experts told The Post.

Ali Larijani’s brother Sadiq Larijani is among the favorites to replace his brother and lead Iran while Mojtaba remains hidden from the public eye, said Yigal Carmon, president of the Middle East Media Research Institute in Israel.

“He might be a candidate because the IRGC would want a hardliner. They need someone who will go with them who will move with them, who will collaborate with them,” Carmon said.

“He’s not a competitor with them. He will work with them,” he added.

Janatan Sayeh, an analyst on Iran at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, also said Sadiq would be the likely candidate given his role as the chair of Tehran’s Expediency Discernment Council, a body that advises the supreme leader.

His rank as a grand ayatollah whose father had clashed with Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi is also likely to help his standing as a committed member of the Islamic regime.

Iran’s Parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Larijani’s main rival, could also take the reins given his strong ties with the IRGC, said Khosro Isfahani, the research director for the Washington-based National Union for Democracy in Iran (NUFDI) think tank.

Ghalibaf had previously served as the commander of the IRGC air force and has constantly appeared on Iranian state TV leading parliament in chants of “Death to America! Death to Israel!”

Ghalibaf is widely seen as the man serving as a link between Mojtaba, the state bureaucracy, and the IRGC.

The likelihood of Iran selecting a moderate to replace Larijani is unlikely given the IRGC’s push to name hardline successors during the war with Israel and the US.

Technically, a three-man council has been named to lead the nation of 90 million people after the supreme leader’s death. They are Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian; Ayatollah Alireza Aarafi, the head of Iran’s Guardian Council, a collection of clerics and lawyer’s tasked with ensuring the country’s political candidates and elections are sufficiently Islamic; and Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei, the head of the courts.

But all three men are drawn from the political classes of Iran — and the real power in recent years has always been with the IRGC, according to observers.

Ali Larijani had risen to become the second most powerful man in Iran before the war — behind only the supreme leader.

He had served as a central figure with deep roots across Tehran’s political and economic landscape, making it difficult to find someone capable of replacing him, said Mona Yacoubian, director of the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Middle East Program.

“We’re seeing a continuing trend of an Iranian rump regime that’s hardline and more connected to the IRGC,” she added.

Larijani’s stature allowed him to effectively run Iran despite the Islamic Republic naming Mojtaba Khamenei as its new supreme leader last week.

Larijani was previously viewed as a pragmatic moderate, but in recent years had taken over Iran’s nuclear negotiations and led the brutal crackdown against protesters, which saw thousands killed in the streets, and more tortured and executed in Iran’s prisons.

The IRGC’s new commander, Gen. Ahmad Vahid, had pushed Iran’s Assembly of Experts to vote for Mojtaba as a way to spite the US and Israel and signal Tehran’s animosity of the West, The New York Times reported.

The push came despite Larijani and other moderates pushing for more centrist candidates like Aarafi, former Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, and Hassan Khomeini, the grandson of the founding father of the theocracy, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.

Follow The Post’s coverage of the United States’ airstrikes on Iran:

Like with Mojtaba’s appointment, the IRGC will likely be the masterminds to select Larijani’s replacement to serve their own needs, said Vali Nasr, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

“With every assassination US and Israel [are] engineering greater radicalization of Iran’s leadership. It will make for a bleak future for Iran, Iranians, the region and ultimately makes it far more difficult for US to disentangle itself from endless conflict in the region,” Nasr wrote on X.

But whomever takes the reins could face a short lifespan of his own if he’s not willing to negotiate with Trump to end the war.

“As senior officials watch figures such as Khamenei and Larijani get eliminated, they notice that the personal risk associated with holding high office in the Islamic Republic rises sharply,” Isfahani said.

“Such operations will make regime officials realize that they have two options: absolute annihilation or total surrender.”