On September 13, 2025, the Times of Israel, a prominent Israeli newspaper, launched a vicious post-mortem attack on Charlie Kirk, assassinated just three days earlier on September 10, 2025.

Labeling him the “wrong kind of friend” to Israel, the publication exploits his murder to bolster an anti-American narrative, revealing its hypocrisy and desperation. Global sympathy for Israel, once strong after the October 7, 2023, massacre, has long eroded into criticism, isolating the nation.

Nevertheless, the Times uses Kirk’s death to redirect blame, disparaging a vocal supporter to keep control of the narrative. The article claims, “Support dwindled steadily, and among the few who remained vocal, some were hardly allies we should celebrate.”

This opportunistic attack by a prominent Israeli voice dishonors Kirk’s legacy, using his assassination as a platform to demand ideological conformity. The Times’ betrayal exposes their moral failings, valuing propaganda over gratitude for a fallen ally. Below, we analyze this harsh criticism of Kirk’s advocacy for Israel.

Kirk’s Pro-Israel Advocacy and Israeli Grief

Charlie Kirk was a steadfast advocate for Israel, garnering widespread admiration for his resolute support against global criticism. His assassination on September 10, 2025, incited genuine grief across Israel, with media outlets commemorating his efforts.

The article notes, “Many Israelis grieved. Television studios devoted full-day coverage.” Social media mirrored this sorrow, sharing clips of Kirk’s fervent defenses and tributes to his family, reflecting Israel’s appreciation for a true ally.

Yet, the Times of Israel’s attack starkly contradicts this mourning, revealing blatant hypocrisy. While invoking John Stuart Mill’s free speech defense to argue no one should die for their views, the outlet twists this principle to justify smearing Kirk posthumously.

This duplicity—grieving publicly while trashing him privately—sets the stage for exposing the Times’ calculated campaign to vilify a man who stood by Israel when few others did.

Times of Israel’s Vicious Smear Campaign

The Times of Israel’s assault on Charlie Kirk is a ruthless smear, painting him as an extremist whose views clash with Israel’s self-proclaimed democratic values. The article labels him racist and misogynist, exaggerating his statements to vilify a murdered American ally.

It cites, “He claimed that Western culture was inherently ‘superior’ to all others and urged audiences to stop listening to rap,” falsely tying these views to anti-Black sentiment. It further distorts remarks, like questioning a Black pilot’s competence or suggesting public executions, stripping away context to portray Kirk as hateful.

The article also dismisses Kirk’s evangelical motives as insincere, a cheap shot that ignores his genuine fight against anti-Semitism. This character assassination isn’t critique but a deliberate effort to discredit conservative support for Israel.

By branding Kirk an “evil man” spreading hate, the Times demands ideological conformity, betraying allies in a desperate bid to sanitize Israel’s image.

Rejecting Israel’s Hypocritical Ally Standards

The Times of Israel’s trashing of Charlie Kirk reveals Israel’s hypocritical standards, suggesting the nation should reject even staunch supporters like Kirk if they don’t align with elite values. This stance, amid Israel’s growing isolation, exposes moral bankruptcy.

The article warns, “It suggests that the moral foundation of Israel’s legitimacy is being eroded until only voices utterly alien to the values upon which the State of Israel was founded remain.”

This isn’t about Kirk’s flaws but Israel’s obsession with narrative control, deflecting scrutiny by dictating who qualifies as an acceptable ally. Rejecting Kirk’s evangelical-rooted support as unworthy alienates vital backers, prioritizing ideological purity over survival.

The Times’ manipulation, exploiting a murdered ally’s death, underscores their desperation to shield Israel’s agenda, revealing a nation more concerned with propaganda than gratitude.

Conclusion

The Times of Israel’s vicious trashing of Charlie Kirk is a hypocritical ploy, exploiting his September 10, 2025, assassination to deflect criticism of Israel’s actions. By branding him the “wrong kind of friend,” the outlet questions, “Were these ever the advocates we needed in the first place?”, dismissing his sacrifices while ignoring Israel’s own contradictions.

This smear reveals a desperate media establishment prioritizing narrative control over honoring allies.