New Info on Chinese Spy Balloon From NORAD Commander Is Jaw-Dropping
Share this

At this point, everything the Biden team says about the Chinese spy balloon just seems to make the problem worse.

One of the big questions that people have had is why the balloon wasn’t shot down earlier, for example, over the Aleutian Islands, near Alaska. Or over any of the less populated areas of Alaska, Canada, or Montana that it went over?

Now, they’re out with more comments and they’re not helping themselves. They had earlier claimed they didn’t have a “water shot.” That answer has now “evolved” further.

According to the Department of Defense, the U.S. did not have time to shoot down the Chinese spy balloon right after it crossed into Alaskan waters.

The balloon “did not present a physical threat” to the US and Canada, said Gen. Glen VanHerck, Commander of North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and United States Northern Command (USNORTHCOM). “I could not take immediate action because it was not demonstrating … hostile intent.”

Um, what? You let a spy balloon from a hostile foreign power enter our airspace with God knows what intention because it wasn’t demonstrating “a hostile intent”? Exactly how do you judge that? Wait until it gets to where it wants to go and drops something? My colleague Bob Hoge outlined any number of things that such a balloon could be involved in, including an EMP attack. Do they have to be holding up a sign that says: “We come to attack you/spy on you”? Come on, man! This seems to be an insane military reaction. Not to mention a terrible signal to our enemies that we are risk-averse and won’t do the basic things we need to do to protect our country.

That answer also evolved — did you not take the shot because you didn’t have a shot or you didn’t take it because it wasn’t demonstrating hostile intent? Which was it here?

But it gets worse.

“Northcom chief Gen. VanHerck says the balloon was up to 200 ft tall, with a payload the size of a jetliner,” Politico reporter Lara Seligman said. “It weighed ‘in excess of a couple thousand lbs’ and potentially carried explosives ‘to detonate and destroy the balloon.’”

So, VanHerck is saying it was that big with potential explosives, but they didn’t see any “hostile intent” or potential issue with letting it float over the country for more than a week? Am I losing my mind here, or is this explanation crazy? I’m wondering if the real answer here — and why nothing makes sense — is that they did tell Joe Biden right away and he’s the guy who was talking about “no hostile intent” and said don’t take the shot.

VanHerck said one other important piece of information: He said that U.S. intel agencies “pieced together” through additional means of intel collection that there had been three prior balloons that had been undetected. I wrote about the problems with what the Biden team has said so far on this and how the narrative keeps changing.

Once again this raises big questions: Is it three or four? What about the one four months ago over Hawaii that has been reported? Supposedly there were three under Trump and one under Biden that were undetected. And how could they go undetected given the powerful ability that we supposedly have to detect things? Is he saying that we can’t detect a slow-moving balloon of such size? Yes, that’s what he’s saying.

“I will tell you we did not detect those threats and that’s a domain awareness gap we have to figure out,” Gen. VanHerck said. They became aware due to additional means of intel collection.

What did the incursions involve and was there any spying? How is the intel community reaching this conclusion? Did they drop this to cover Joe Biden’s posterior because of the backlash? This shows a huge hole in the defense of our country if this is true. And they just announced it to our enemies.

Trending on RedState Video

Share this
You May Also Like

Watch: DC Council Chair Claims 'There Is No Crime Crisis,' It Backfires Almost Immediately

Democrats and their media allies have been gaslighting the hell out of…

Jason Ritters was battling alcoholism when he met wife Melanie Lynskey

Jason Ritters didn’t think he “deserved” his now-wife, Melanie Lynskey, at the…

Howard Schultz to defend Starbucks labor practices at Sanders-led Senate hearing

WASHINGTON — Sen. Bernie Sanders and Howard Schultz are squaring off Wednesday…

Two Blackhawk helicopters crash in Kentucky, Army base says

Two Blackhawk helicopters crashed during a training incident in Kentucky on Wednesday,…

BioNTech Shares Fall as COVID-19 Vaccine Demand Declines

We made significant progress in 2022 by advancing our pipeline and launching…

King Charles arrives at Bundestag for day 2 of state visit to Germany

The King has taken home some German cheese and his wife Camilla…

Megyn Kelly ‘f–king sick’ of calls to ban guns after Nashville shooting

Megyn Kelly slammed calls for gun control following Monday’s mass shooting at…

United flight makes emergency landing in Houston due to possible engine fire

A United Airlines flight that left Houston for Rio de Janeiro reversed…

Victims of Nashville school shooting honored in somber vigil

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Hundreds gathered Wednesday at a candlelight vigil in…

Manhattan hedge funder pays $1bn to ex-wife, 64, after she left him for FEMALE gallerist

A Manhattan hedge funder, who is one of the world’s richest men,…

California may end travel ban to states with anti-LGBT laws

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — When North Carolina in 2016 banned transgender people…

NYC’s Hell’s Kitchen targeted in string of drug-fueled thefts, says NYPD

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site…