Tucker Carlson unleashed a fierce critique of neoconservatives and Zionists in a recent episode of the podcast Part of the Problem with Dave Smith, branding them as unapologetically pro-violence.

Tucker Carlson criticized those who support violent actions, questioning how anyone could defend the mass deaths of civilians or acts of terror. “They are openly pro-violence,” Carlson remarked. “How can anyone justify killing tens of thousands of children or a terror attack that indiscriminately maims people? What exactly are you celebrating? You’re celebrating violence.”

He drew a sharp distinction between this mentality and his own stance, which opposes harming innocents. He clearly differentiated himself from neoconservative figures like Ben Shapiro and Lindsey Graham, establishing a moral boundary.

Dave Smith added perspective by referring to a controversial tweet from 2011 by Ben Shapiro, where Shapiro labeled Ron Paul as “manifestly evil” and likened him to someone “gripping the neck of a Jew.” This was a harsh critique of a figure known for his peaceful demeanor. Smith commented, “If you said that about Ron Paul, then, Ben Shapiro, you get Nick Fuentes.”

Carlson extended his criticism to other well-known conservatives like Josh Hammer and Ted Cruz. “They categorize people by groups,” Carlson noted. “If the group means family, that’s one thing, but if it’s strictly about ethnicity, it leads to hatred of others.” He pointed out the ethnic animosity in Shapiro’s comments about Paul, stating, “I don’t like it.”

Addressing the broader political scene, Carlson denounced figures like Lindsey Graham as “violent enthusiasts” who are seduced by the “thrill of killing enemies” and the illusion of “godlike power” in taking lives. “We have no right to kill people. We do not have the right to kill the innocent, period,” Carlson asserted.

He accused Shapiro of trying to silence dissenters by labeling them as “Holocaust deniers” simply for opposing the mass killing of civilians. In Carlson’s view, Shapiro’s perspective finds “joy in killing innocents.”

Carlson expanded this critique, calling out other prominent conservatives such as Josh Hammer and Ted Cruz. “They think in terms of groups… if your group means your family, that’s one thing, but if purely your ethnic group, then you inevitably become hateful to other groups,” Carlson explained. He highlighted the ethnic hatred behind Shapiro’s attack on Paul, saying plainly, “I don’t like it.”

Turning to the broader political establishment, Carlson condemned figures like Lindsey Graham as “violence worshippers” intoxicated by the “thrill that they feel killing their enemies” and the illusion of “godlike power” in extinguishing human life. “We don’t have a right to kill people. We do not have a right to kill the innocent, period,” Carlson emphasized.

He accused Shapiro of attempting to silence critics by accusing them of being “Holocaust deniers” merely for opposing the mass killing of civilians. According to Carlson, Shapiro’s worldview revels in “joy in killing innocents.”

The commentary reached a climax when Carlson cited a video from the recent Republican Jewish Coalition Leadership Summit showing Graham boasting, “We’re killing the right people.” Carlson warned, “Imagine what it’s going to be like standing at the judgment… celebrating killing the right people. I wouldn’t want to be that man.”

This hard-hitting dialogue between Carlson and Smith exposed the fatalistic and violent ideology underpinning Neoconservative and Zionist politics, urging listeners to recognize that what is often framed as patriotism or loyalty is, at its core, an endorsement of violence.

This episode of Part of the Problem sheds light on the stark divides within the conservative movement, exposing a faction that embraces violence and ethnic hatred versus those who reject such extremism in defense of innocent life. Carlson’s unflinching stance challenges the mainstream right-wing narrative, demanding accountability for those who glorify war and civilian suffering under the guise of group identity or foreign policy.