Trump wins over groups who challenged anti-DEI orders
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump observes as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent formally swears in Paul Atkins as the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the Oval Office at the White House on Tuesday, April 22, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Alex Brandon).

Two states in the Pacific Northwest are urgently requesting a federal court to prevent President Donald Trump and his administration from meddling with their established election procedures.

On March 25, the 45th and 47th president signed Executive Order 14248, titled “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections.” This order aims to significantly alter the administration of elections across the country by, among other measures, enforcing a rule that requires all voters to provide official documentation proving their citizenship and discontinuing vote-by-mail systems that accept ballots postmarked by but received after Election Day.

In Oregon and Washington, the default voting mechanism is a postal ballot; such vote-by-mail systems have been in place for decades.

On Thursday, in a 35-page motion for partial summary judgment, the states asked U.S. District Judge John H. Chun, a Joe Biden appointee, to permanently enjoin multiple sections of Trump’s order as unconstitutional and ultra vires, or, beyond the president’s power.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

“The Constitution is clear: States are responsible for regulating ‘[t]he Times, Places and Manner’ of federal elections, subject only to alteration by Congress,” the motion begins. “The President has no constitutional authority to interfere with state election laws. Nor has Congress given the President statutory authority to do so.”

The plaintiffs are looking for a quick end to the litigation at the district court level by arguing the far-reaching the order simply lacks any authority to undo electoral prerogatives long-exercised by the states.

“Among other things, this order purports to impose new restrictions on registering to vote, set aside long-standing and widespread state laws setting ballot-return deadlines, and dictate which voting machines can be federally certified,” the motion reads. “But the President has no authority to do any of this. And by attempting to assert unilateral control over elections, the President is threatening the foundation of our democracy.”

And without such authority, the plaintiffs say, Trump’s order has no merit — and any agencies enforcing it would be breaking the law.

“The Framers carefully divided power over elections between the States and Congress to prevent the accumulation of power in any one source,” the motion continues. “The President’s illegal effort to consolidate his nonexistent power over elections flies in the face of that principle.”

Chief among the plaintiffs’ complaints are the government’s efforts to prohibit states from accepting mail ballots received after Election Day. In Washington and Oregon, such votes are counted “as long as the ballots were cast on or before election day,” the motion explains.

Trump, for his part, likens such laws to “allowing persons who arrive 3 days after Election Day, perhaps after a winner has been declared, to vote in person at a former voting precinct.”

To that end, the government has sought to condition “any available funding to a State” on the exclusion of ballots received after Election Day. In another case challenging the executive order, the government advanced the notion of using “criminal” prosecutions to secure compliance with the proposed ban.

The states rubbished the Trump administration’s efforts to change their ballot-receipt deadlines as ultra vires — that is, an overreach extending beyond legal power or authority — and lacking any basis in statute.

“This is entirely unlawful,” the motion continues. “Federal law does not create a ballot-receipt deadline. The statutes cited in the Executive Order (2 U.S.C. § 7 and 3 U.S.C. § 1) are conspicuously silent on when timely-cast ballots must be received. The President has no authority to invent new election regulations. Any effort by the U.S. Attorney General to enforce the made-up ballot-receipt deadline is unlawful, as is imposing new, non-congressionally approved conditions on federal funding.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Immigrant Youth Take Legal Action Against Trump Administration’s Sudden Policy Change

President Donald Trump listens during a swearing-in ceremony for Dr. Mehmet Oz…

The 5th Circuit Court has the sole authority to rule on the Alien Enemies Act case.

President Donald Trump takes part in the 157th National Memorial Day Observance…

Judge Rules Trump’s Dismissal of FTC Commissioner Was ‘Unlawful’

Left: U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt is captured moments before delivering his “On…

Tenant Fatally Attacks Leasing Manager After Receiving Non-Renewal Notice

Image Credit: Background – Alpine Apartments of Weidner Apartment Homes, Anchorage, Alaska…

Police Report: Man Drove with Deceased Woman’s Body During Pursuit

Left: Gavin Thompson (Lancaster County Department of Corrections). Right: Dorinda Segebrecht (Iowa…

Man Attempts to Arrange Murder of Federal Prosecutor and FBI Agent

Left: Miami Federal Detention Center, where Anthony Brillante is incarcerated (Google Maps).…

Woman Sentenced for Concealing Boyfriend’s Body in Basement

Inset: Wendy Stone leaving federal court in Monroe County, New York in…

Court Dismisses Lawsuit Regarding the Release of Personal Information of January 6th FBI Agents

U.S. President Donald Trump addresses his supporters at the Save America Rally…

Gainesville Resident Faces 13 Charges Related to Child Pornography Allegations

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Quentin Elijah Emslie, 19, was arrested today…

Ex-Boyfriend Accused of Spiking Vodka with Bleach After Breakup

Share copy link Edwin Guzman (Volusia County Sheriff”s Office). A Florida boyfriend…

Trump Requests Judge to Reject Mary Trump’s Discovery Request

Left: Mary Trump discussing her book “Who Could Ever Love You: A…

Florida Man on Probation Violently Abducts Store Clerk, Captured on Camera

A Florida man was taken into custody and charged with kidnapping, among…