Under the new reforms, declarations related to these events will initially be in effect for 14 days, with the possibility of extension up to three months. This decision has sparked further criticism, with opponents arguing that the measures are more a result of political pressure than a thoughtful approach to ensuring public safety.

One outspoken critic, Blatman, has claimed that these laws do not stem from a genuine concern for community safety but are instead a response to political demands. As the debate continues, the conversation around balancing safety and the right to protest remains a contentious issue in Sydney.

Critics label laws ‘draconian’

“These laws are borne of political pressure, not a genuine consideration for the safety of our community,” Blatman said.

“What happened in Bondi was an evil antisemitic attack but let it be very clear, there is nothing connecting these attacks to the movement for justice in Palestine, to the protests we held, to the marches we shared,” she said.

Lees said the group reiterates its “complete opposition to all forms of racism, including antisemitism” but called the reforms “kneejerk anti-protest laws”.

While symbols of terrorist groups are already prohibited under federal laws, NSW Attorney General Michael Daley said the proposed state laws would be simpler.

“Whatever the reasons for those protests and genuine grievances or concerns about what is happening overseas, my responsibility is in Sydney.”

Victoria to follow NSW