Internewscast
Image default
News

University of California Considers Phasing Out Standardized Tests

SACRAMENTO — In a debate with major implications for the future of standardized testing, leaders at the University of California are expected to decide Thursday whether to effectively eliminate the SAT and ACT as requirements for admission at the system’s 10 schools, which are some of the most popular in the country.

The system’s Board of Regents is considering a proposal from its president, Janet Napolitano, to suspend the tests as an admissions requirement until 2024 and eliminate them after that as the university develops its own test for applicants.

The system has already temporarily suspended the testing requirement for current applicants because of disruptions created by the coronavirus pandemic, a move made by many other colleges nationwide.

Ms. Napolitano’s recommendation came after several years of pressure on the University of California system, including a lawsuit filed last year by a largely black school district in Compton, Calif., and a coalition of students and advocacy groups, who argue that the time-honored tests discriminate based on race and income.

It remains uncertain what path the regents will follow, however. A range of members, including the board chair, John A. Pérez, a former State Assembly speaker, have questioned the value of test scores. But the president’s proposal runs counter to a recommendation from the system’s faculty senate, which voted in April to keep the SAT and ACT.

And the board planned to vote only after hearing hours of testimony from political, civil liberties and testing organizations.

Ms. Napolitano’s proposal would make the tests optional for two years, then remove them entirely as a requirement for entry for in-state students, while giving the university time to develop its own customized test for admission, perhaps in collaboration with other California schools. If that test isn’t available by 2025, the university would drop standardized test scores from its admissions formula entirely.

The cry to do away with standardized testing has been growing for several years and only deepened after last year’s college admissions scandal. Opponents argue that the tests are biased against students who are poor, black and Hispanic, and too easily gamed by those who can pay for test preparation courses.

But the University of California’s decision is expected to have an outsized impact on the future of standardized testing because of the system’s size — some 300,000 students attend annually — and popularity among applicants. Six of its schools top the list of most-applied-for in the nation, with the University of California, Los Angeles, consistently the most sought after. And four-fifths of applicants to U.C. schools take the SAT, making the system the largest source of customers for the College Board.

The regents’ decision could influence other universities in California, as well. Ms. Napolitano wrote that the state’s other four-year system, the nearly 500,000-student California State University, “has indicated a willingness to work with U.C. on developing a new test.”

Standardized test scores are just one component of a complex formula for admission to U.C. schools, which includes high school grade point averages and other metrics. The state guarantees a berth to the top 12.5 percent of California high school students.

Supporters of standardized testing have argued that the ACT and SAT provide an important yardstick to assess students across disparate school districts and states. And the College Board and ACT Inc., which own the tests, say any inequities in scores reflect existing gaps in the American educational system, and are not a fault of the tests themselves.

But as California has struggled to maintain campus diversity since voters passed a 1996 ban on affirmative action, pressure has grown on the U.C. system to take action as its top campuses, such as U.C.L.A. and the University of California, Berkeley, have become almost as difficult to get into as some Ivy League schools and demographically dominated by white and Asian students.

For the last 20 years, black enrollment at the U.C. schools has scarcely broken 4 percent, though African-Americans represent 6.5 percent of the state’s population. Nearly 40 percent of the state is Hispanic, the largest ethnic group in “majority-minority” California, but only 22 percent of students in the U.C. system are.

Advocacy groups and lawsuits have been pushing colleges and universities across the country to make test scores optional in admissions, a movement that started largely at small liberal arts schools but has been spreading.

The highly ranked University of Chicago, which went test-optional in 2018, reported last year that the entering freshman class had nearly a quarter more first-generation and low-income students and 56 percent more rural students than the prior year, with about 10 percent opting against submitting test scores.

In response to criticism, the College Board proposed a new SAT scoring system last year that came to be known as the “adversity score,” which would put each student’s results into the context of that student’s school or neighborhood. But the company withdrew that proposal after being criticized for trying to distill complex factors into a single score.

  • Frequently Asked Questions and Advice

    Updated May 20, 2020

    • How many people have lost their jobs due to coronavirus in the U.S.?

      Over 38 million people have filed for unemployment since March. One in five who were working in February reported losing a job or being furloughed in March or the beginning of April, data from a Federal Reserve survey released on May 14 showed, and that pain was highly concentrated among low earners. Fully 39 percent of former workers living in a household earning $40,000 or less lost work, compared with 13 percent in those making more than $100,000, a Fed official said.

    • What are the symptoms of coronavirus?

      Common symptoms include fever, a dry cough, fatigue and difficulty breathing or shortness of breath. Some of these symptoms overlap with those of the flu, making detection difficult, but runny noses and stuffy sinuses are less common. The C.D.C. has also added chills, muscle pain, sore throat, headache and a new loss of the sense of taste or smell as symptoms to look out for. Most people fall ill five to seven days after exposure, but symptoms may appear in as few as two days or as many as 14 days.

    • How can I protect myself while flying?

      If air travel is unavoidable, there are some steps you can take to protect yourself. Most important: Wash your hands often, and stop touching your face. If possible, choose a window seat. A study from Emory University found that during flu season, the safest place to sit on a plane is by a window, as people sitting in window seats had less contact with potentially sick people. Disinfect hard surfaces. When you get to your seat and your hands are clean, use disinfecting wipes to clean the hard surfaces at your seat like the head and arm rest, the seatbelt buckle, the remote, screen, seat back pocket and the tray table. If the seat is hard and nonporous or leather or pleather, you can wipe that down, too. (Using wipes on upholstered seats could lead to a wet seat and spreading of germs rather than killing them.)

    • Is ‘Covid toe’ a symptom of the disease?

      There is an uptick in people reporting symptoms of chilblains, which are painful red or purple lesions that typically appear in the winter on fingers or toes. The lesions are emerging as yet another symptom of infection with the new coronavirus. Chilblains are caused by inflammation in small blood vessels in reaction to cold or damp conditions, but they are usually common in the coldest winter months. Federal health officials do not include toe lesions in the list of coronavirus symptoms, but some dermatologists are pushing for a change, saying so-called Covid toe should be sufficient grounds for testing.

    • Should I wear a mask?

      The C.D.C. has recommended that all Americans wear cloth masks if they go out in public. This is a shift in federal guidance reflecting new concerns that the coronavirus is being spread by infected people who have no symptoms. Until now, the C.D.C., like the W.H.O., has advised that ordinary people don’t need to wear masks unless they are sick and coughing. Part of the reason was to preserve medical-grade masks for health care workers who desperately need them at a time when they are in continuously short supply. Masks don’t replace hand washing and social distancing.

    • What should I do if I feel sick?

      If you’ve been exposed to the coronavirus or think you have, and have a fever or symptoms like a cough or difficulty breathing, call a doctor. They should give you advice on whether you should be tested, how to get tested, and how to seek medical treatment without potentially infecting or exposing others.

    • How can I help?

      Charity Navigator, which evaluates charities using a numbers-based system, has a running list of nonprofits working in communities affected by the outbreak. You can give blood through the American Red Cross, and World Central Kitchen has stepped in to distribute meals in major cities.


Carol Christ, now the chancellor at U.C. Berkeley, was one of the first university administrators to eliminate the SAT requirement nearly two decades ago when she became president of Smith College in Northampton, Mass. On Thursday, she told the regents that she viewed the SAT and ACT as “a biased instrument” that would only become more skewed in the wake of the pandemic disruptions.

But a U.C. faculty task force commissioned to study the impact of standardized tests found earlier this year that the SAT and ACT predicted college success within the system more effectively than high school grades or other measures.

In fact, the task force found, in many cases the tests gave a leg up to black, Latino and low-income students by offering an additional metric for admissions officers who might have rejected them because their grades didn’t meet the university’s threshold.

That task force recommended in February that the university keep the ACT and SAT, pending the development of its own standardized test for admission, a process that it estimated would take nearly a decade.

Amid pushback, Ms. Napolitano proposed that the regents split the difference, fast-tracking the new test while turning test scores into a temporary metric for out-of-state applicants, scholarships and assessing eligibility for the 12.5 percent in-state cutoff.

Faculty response to Ms. Napolitano’s recommendation was publicly neutral, but some involved in the report have privately predicted that her proposal would make admissions more subjective and confusing, and it drew fire from conservative editorial boards and testing organizations.

“These new recommendations will further the uncertainty and anxiety of students and their families at a time when they need all the reassurances and resources we can provide,” Marten Roorda, the chief executive of the ACT, wrote to the regents, adding that dropping the tests “will make admissions much more subjective.”

Anemona Hartocollis contributed reporting from New York.

Source: NY times

Related posts

Leave a Comment