Man Who Purchased Gun For Kyle Rittenhouse Takes Plea Deal

MILWAUKEE (AP) — The man who bought Kyle Rittenhouse an assault-style rifle when he was only 17 has agreed to plead no contest to contributing to the delinquency of a minor, a non-criminal citation, and avoid convictions on the two felonies he’d been facing.

The Journal Sentinel reports Dominick Black, 20, was charged in November 2020 with two counts of delivering a dangerous weapon to a minor, resulting in death. The two counts related to Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, the protesters Rittenhouse fatally shot the night of Aug. 25, 2020, in Kenosha.

Black was 18 when he purchased the rifle for Rittenhouse at a hardware store in Rusk County in May of that year. At 17, Rittenhouse was too young to legally purchase the weapon.

Dominick Black said he bought Kyle Rittenhouse's AR-15 rifle for him because Rittenhouse was underage. He's shown Rittenhouse's rifle by Kenosha Police detective Ben Antaramian during the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in November.
Dominick Black said he bought Kyle Rittenhouse’s AR-15 rifle for him because Rittenhouse was underage. He’s shown Rittenhouse’s rifle by Kenosha Police detective Ben Antaramian during the Kyle Rittenhouse trial in November.

Pool via Getty Images

In August 2020, Rittenhouse used the rifle to kill two people and wound a third during protests in Kenosha. In November, a jury found him not guilty, based on his claim of self-defense.

Black was the first prosecution witness at Rittenhouse’s trial, but the status of his own charges were up in the air after Judge Bruce Schroeder agreed to throw out one of the charges against Rittenhouse — that he unlawfully possessed a firearm as a minor. The defense convinced Schroeder that an exception in the law allows 17-year-olds to possess rifles and shotguns, or at least left the law too vague to be enforceable.

On Friday, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger filed a proposed plea agreement. It suggested Black would plead no contest to a pair of citations, and pay a $2,000 fine, and the felony counts would be dismissed.

A hearing is scheduled Monday morning. Schroeder could reject the deal, or dismiss the original felony counts based on his ruling about the minors-with-firearms law in the Rittenhouse case.

Source: huffpost

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Police Say Man Attacked Woman With Nunchucks in Violent Assault

Share copy link Melvin Blackburn (Bingham County Sheriff’s Office). An Idaho man…

Man on Pre-Trial Release Arrested After Allegedly Pointing Rifle, Threatening Victims at Northwest Park

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Jeffrey Scott Wallace, 40, was taken into…

Police Seek Public’s Help to ID Suspects in Brown’s Country Buffet Robbery on June 13

Staff report based on an Alachua Police Department release ALACHUA, Fla. –…

Police Say Woman Assaulted Boyfriend With Nail-Studded Board

Share copy link Marvinesha Hopkins (Louisville (Ky.) Metro Department of Corrections). A…

Barrett vs. Alito on Mail-In Voting: The Supreme Court Clash Explained

Left: U.S. Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr. attends inauguration ceremonies…

DA Says Toddler Choked to Death on Popcorn Kernels While Mother Was Drinking

Inset, from left: Olivia Bithorn and Luke Russell Jr. (Nassau County District…

Woman Secretly Livestreamed Ex-Husband on Ring Camera for More Than 700 Hours

Inset: Rayna Bell appears in court. Background: Ring camera footage allegedly showing…

Chief Justice Roberts Delivers Major Supreme Court Blow to Trump’s Executive Order

Left: President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office before signing a…