Imagine having your own space at work. For most Australians working in corporate offices, it’s a far-off dream.

Around 2.2 million Australians aged between 15 and 24 were employed in July 2025, with most only familiar with the hustle and clamor of open-plan offices.

But there was a time – one older members of the workforce still recall – when the cubicle reigned supreme in offices all over the country.

Gone are the days before hotdesking, when employees were not constantly subjected to the sights, sounds, and smells of a communal workspace, which can significantly hinder productivity.

As companies encourage staff to transition from work-from-home setups back to the office, will 2025 mark Australia’s return to the traditional cubicle layout?

One expert says it’s not entirely out of the question.

The death of the office cubicle

Once an Aussie office staple, cubicles were largely phased out by the 2000s.

They were meant to be an affordable alternative to private offices that still gave employees a sense of space and privacy.

But over time, some employees and employers came to view “cubicle farms” as oppressive and isolating.

Many adopted open-plan layouts instead.

Open-plan offices, championed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright, were intended to promote communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and idea generation among workers.

Or so the theory went.

“Regrettably, the outcomes have not aligned with expectations,” says Dr. Libby Sander, MBA director and Associate Professor of Organisational Behaviour at Bond University, to 9news.com.au.

“Extensive research over the past 15 years conclusively demonstrates that merely placing people in a single space doesn’t lead to those desired results.”

“In fact, it can often do the opposite.”

To work in an open-plan office is to be distracted.

Aussie workers report the constant noise makes it significantly harder to get work done, with some saying they can be distracted 80 times in a single morning.

It doesn’t even need to be a direct distraction, like being asked a question or roped into a conversation, either.

A study Sander ran found that workers exposed to standard open-plan office noise, even over a short period of time, experienced a 34 per cent spike in physiological stress and a 25 per cent increase in negative mood.

“When you couple that with the interruptions and distractions of people actually coming up and talking to you, or having a meeting next to your desk … it’s very, very difficult for people to do focused and concentrated work,” Sander said.

“They become more withdrawn, even hostile in some cases … because they get very, very frustrated that they just can’t concentrate.”

Research also shows it can take up to 20 minutes to get back on task after being distracted – and that’s bad for business.

It’s part of why so many Aussies have latched onto WFH arrangements and refuse to let go, even years post-pandemic.

The rise of hotdesking and “activity-based working” hasn’t helped either.

While it can work for some industries and roles, even Sander agreed “a lot of people are very unhappy with” having to share desks with colleagues that don’t always clean up after themselves – if they can find a desk at all.

Resurrecting the cubicle – or something like it

With many businesses still trying to coax workers back into the office, now seems like the perfect time to address the layout issues that make staff reluctant to return.

“Companies are starting to realise the impact that noise, distraction and interruption actually has on their employee, which is their biggest expense,” Sander said.

“And that the savings you make in real estate by not giving everyone their own space, or cramming everyone into an open plan space, doesn’t actually pay off in the long term.”

But the solution isn’t as simple as resurrecting cubicles in every office.

Instead, Sander recommended businesses design office layouts specific to the work employees need to get done.

That could mean cubicles, private offices, or a well-designed open-plan layout with private spaces available.

Some companies have already invested in small, free-standing office “booths” where staff can work without distraction.

It may also mean allowing long-term WFH arrangements; whatever works best for staff just trying to get the job done.

“There isn’t a one-size-fits-all answer,” Sander said.

“Because ultimately, you need to have a variety of options for people who have a variety of needs.”

And with a looming talent shortage, aging populations and declining birth rates, businesses that don’t try to meet staff needs risk falling behind those that do.

“As we understand more and more the impact of noise and distraction, we are going to see better-designed offices with better acoustics, more dividers, less open-plan space, so people can actually concentrate and get their work done,” Sander said.

“If you’re not doing that, your competitors are already doing it or going to do it, and you’re going to get left behind.”