A legal gap allows the man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk to avoid any federal charges, despite the considerable involvement of the FBI in the investigation.

Tyler James Robinson, a 22-year-old from Washington, Utah, was detained on counts of aggravated murder, discharging a firearm resulting in serious harm, and obstruction of justice, all classified as felonies.

The decision not to pursue federal charges stems from a narrow set of legal criteria that limit federal jurisdiction in homicide cases. 

Federal charges are not applicable unless the offense happened on federal land, involved a federal official, or is considered a hate crime based on factors like race or religion. None of these criteria apply to Kirk’s case, leaving it in the hands of local prosecutors.

‘Right now, based on the facts I’m aware of, I don’t see an obvious federal crime,’ said Mary McCord, a longtime federal prosecutor to Politico.

‘Of course, there’s hate crimes that sometimes can be applicable, but not for politics.’

Generally, federal homicide charges necessitate fulfilling one of three conditions: a murder on federal property, an assault on a federal official, or a crime motivated by hate against certain protected traits such as race or faith.

Robinson’s trial will proceed under Utah state jurisdiction, allowing every step, from arraignment to sentencing, to be televised— a stark contrast to federal court proceedings.

FBI agents were seen collecting evidence at the scene and questioning witnesses across three states. 

Director also Kash Patel made clear that the Bureau’s involvement would remain supportive.

‘The FBI has a certain role to play, and we will play that role,’ Patel said during a press conference Friday. 

‘We will continue to work with state and local authorities to develop the investigation, to provide them the evidence they need for their ongoing prosecutions.’

That includes coordination with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), whose K-9 units were deployed to track the firearm used in the slaying.

McCord, who now directs Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, once supported efforts to create a domestic terrorism statute. But she now worries that such a law could be misused.

‘Honestly, I’d be more nervous about it, because this administration, even way more so than the first Trump administration, really does seem pretty hell bent on weaponization,’ she said, citing President Trump’s recent remarks blaming the ‘radical left’ for Kirk’s killing. 

‘I would be very nervous right now about how a federal offense like that might get investigated and used. This administration, even more than the first Trump administration, really does seem hell-bent on weaponization.’

With the federal government sidelined, all eyes now turn to Utah, where Robinson’s first court appearance is expected early next week. 

Unlike in federal court, where cameras are strictly prohibited, Utah allows near-total transparency.

‘Utah has one of the best cameras-in-the-courtroom rules in the country,’ Utah media lawyer Jeff Hunt.said. 

‘There’s a presumption of electronic media coverage in our trial courts. The rule applies to all criminal proceedings, from initial appearance to sentencing.’ 

Court TV and major cable networks have already begun vying for access with conservative outlets likely to broadcast wall-to-wall coverage of the proceedings.

Both Utah and the federal system allow for the death penalty. It means Robinson could still faces the maximum possible punishment, even without federal involvement.