In a notable response to the Trump administration’s proposed Compact for Academic Excellence in Education, seven of the nine universities asked to review the plan have voiced their rejection, while the remaining two have withheld commitment.
On October 1, the administration reached out to the University of Arizona, MIT, Vanderbilt University, Brown University, Dartmouth College, the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin, and the University of Virginia, seeking their input on the compact’s principles.
The compact outlines a series of principles such as implementing merit-based admissions and hiring practices without regard to race, sex, political orientation, ethnicity, and nationality. It also emphasizes the commitment to freedom of expression by proposing the elimination of institutional bodies that allegedly penalize and incite hostility toward conservative ideas. Furthermore, it suggests recognizing biological sex in contexts such as athletics and the use of restrooms and locker rooms. The proposed plan also calls for institutional political neutrality and suggests measures for financial accountability and restrictions on admissions for international students.
President Donald Trump, alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, discussed the compact during an executive order signing ceremony at the White House on July 31, 2025, underscoring its significance to the administration. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
The administration’s proposal included the incentive of preferential federal funding for institutions that agreed to the compact. However, despite providing feedback by the stipulated deadline, none of the universities opted to endorse the plan.
While most of the universities provided feedback by the Monday deadline, none agreed to the compact.
Brown University President Christina Paxson wrote a letter to Education Secretary Linda McMahon which says, in part, “I am concerned that the compact, by its very nature and by various provisions would restrict academic freedom and undermine the autonomy of Brown’s governance, critically compromising our ability to fulfill our mission.”
MIT’s president, Sally Kornbluth, said the school rejected the compact because it already does what the compact asks.
The campus of Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire, on Sunday, Oct. 17, 2021. (Bing Guan/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
“These values and other MIT practices meet or exceed many standards outlined in the document you sent. We freely choose these values because they’re right, and we live by them because they support our mission – work of immense value to the prosperity, competitiveness, health and security of the United States. And of course, MIT abides by the law,” she wrote in a letter to McMahon on Oct. 10.
University of Pennsylvania President J. Larry Jameson said in an Oct. 16 statement that the school rejected the compact.
“Earlier today, I informed the U.S. Department of Education that Penn respectfully declines to sign the proposed Compact. As requested, we also provided focused feedback highlighting areas of existing alignment as well as substantive concerns,” the statement said.
Linda McMahon, U.S. education secretary, during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and Related Agencies hearing in Washington, June 3, 2025. (Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
On Oct. 17, Dartmouth rejected the deal, saying it does not believe that “the involvement of the government through a compact—whether it is a Republican- or Democratic-led White House—is the right way to focus America’s leading colleges and universities on their teaching and research mission.”
“Our universities have a responsibility to set our own academic and institutional policies, guided by our mission and values, our commitment to free expression, and our obligations under the law,” a letter to McMahon said. “Staying true to this responsibility is what will help American higher education build bipartisan public trust and continue to uphold its place as the envy of the world.
The University of Southern California acknowledged that while many of the values outlined in the compact were compatible with the school’s established practices, it would not agree to the deal.
The Maclaurin Buildings on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, on Tuesday, Dec. 12, 2023. (Getty Images)
“Notwithstanding these areas of alignment, we are concerned that even though the Compact would be voluntary, tying research benefits to it would, over time, undermine the same values of free inquiry and academic excellence that the Compact seeks to promote,” a letter from USC Interim President Beong-Soo Kim said. “Other countries whose governments lack America’s commitment to freedom and democracy have shown how academic excellence can suffer when shifting external priorities tilt the research playing field away from free, meritocratic competition.”
The University of Virginia declined to join the compact as well, with Paul Mahoney, its interim president, saying, “A contractual arrangement predicating assessment on anything other than merit will undermine the integrity of vital, sometimes lifesaving, research and further erode confidence in American higher education.”
Similarly, the University of Arizona felt its principles had common ground with the compact, but also declined to sign it.
The University of Virginia declined to join the compact. (Daxia Rojas/AFP)
“We have much common ground with the ideas your administration is advancing on changes that would benefit American higher education and our nation at large,” UA President Suresh Garimella wrote to McMahon.
“At the same time, a federal research funding system based on anything other than merit would weaken the world’s preeminent engine for innovation, advancement of technology, and solutions to many of our nation’s most profound challenges,” the letter continued. “We seek no special treatment and believe in our ability to compete for federally funded research strictly on merit.”
Vanderbilt University responded Tuesday, saying it had not been asked to accept or deny the compact, but rather to provide feedback to the administration, which it says it will do.
“Vanderbilt believes deeply in the power of constructive dialogue, particularly among people of differing views and perspectives,” said a letter to the Vanderbilt community from President Daniel Diermeier. “This is often how the greatest progress is made. We look forward to continuing the conversation—on our campus and with leaders in government and higher education—as we work toward our shared goal of restoring public trust in higher education and ensuring that America’s universities remain the best in the world.”
US President Donald Trump signs executive orders relating to higher education institutions in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on April 23, 2025. (Saul Loeb/AFP)
The University of Texas at Austin has not officially accepted or denied the compact, and Kevin Eltife, the chairman of the UT System Board of Regents, said the school was “honored” to be solicited for feedback, according to FOX 7.
“We enthusiastically look forward to engaging with university officials and reviewing the compact immediately,” Eltife said.
