Recently released documents from the Department of Justice have revealed that three affluent brothers, recently found guilty in a significant sex trafficking case, were linked to Jeffrey Epstein.
The Alexander brothers—Tal, Oren, and Alon, who have made their fortunes in real estate—are mentioned in an astonishing FBI interview. A woman has come forward, alleging she was targeted during one of Epstein’s infamous gatherings. The brothers’ spokesperson has refuted these allegations.
During her account to investigators, the woman stated she was just 16 when Oren and Alon, both 38 at the time, reportedly enticed her and a friend to an upper floor at a party held in Epstein’s Manhattan residence. Notably, the documents mistakenly refer to Alon as “Allen.”
The interview notes, which were brought to light by the Daily Mail, describe how the two girls eventually managed to flee the locked room. However, the witness claimed that Oren assaulted her friend, and Tal, the elder brother at 39, attacked a 14-year-old girl.
Following the traumatic event, the young girl allegedly attempted to harm herself, as per the newly uncovered details.
This FBI interview occurred in 2019, a full five years before the Alexander brothers were apprehended and indicted as part of an extensive investigation into sex trafficking, long before their names became widely known.
It surfaced in a trove of roughly three million Epstein-related files released by the Department of Justice last month.
Other documents contained in the tranche reveal some investigators cast doubt on the woman’s account, claiming that she was ‘not credible’.
Brothers Alon (left), Tal (center) and Oren were named in the Epstein files by a woman who claimed the twins lured her to a room during a party at Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion when she was 16 and proceeded to rape her friends
The three brothers are seen standing in a court sketch before the jury delivered their guilty verdict on March 9
The revelations come just three days after Tal, Oren and Alon, were convicted on all 10 counts related to them using their wealth and influence to drug and rape multiple women.
The Manhattan trial heard testimony from 11 women, including one who said she was 17 when she was raped and another who said she was 18 at the time of the attack.
Among the disturbing evidence shown to the jury was shown a chilling video of the 17-year-old being raped by Oren while she was unconscious.
In the FBI interview uncovered by the Daily Mail in the files, the 16-year-old eyewitness explains how she met the brothers through Epstein.
She said she first met Epstein in 2015 while working as a model, later attending parties at his New York mansion.
‘During one of the parties Epstein asked (the victim) to take a tour of (redacted),’ according to the interview.
‘Once Epstein asked (the victim) to “take off her panties”.
‘When she didn’t comply, he said: “It’s fine, I’ll pay you five hundred dollars”.
Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein entertained guests and victims at his lavish Upper East Side townhouse
The victim told investigators twins Oren and Alon lured her and friend upstairs during a party at the disgraced financier’s Manhattan townhouse
‘(The victim) complied because she thought he was a very important person,’ the narrative continues.
On another occasion a year later, Epstein sexually assault the woman, she told the FBI.
In her statement she said: ‘At one of the parties, two twin brothers, Allen [Alon] and Oren, who were involved in real estate lured [redacted] and her friend upstairs and locked the door.
[Redacted] ‘knocked the door back open’ and the two ran back downstairs.
‘[Redacted] stated Oren raped [redacted]a nd Oren’s brother, Tal, raped a 14-year-old girl named [redacted] and tried to slit her wrist after the incident’.
The same allegations appear in another FBI document summarizing claims made by Epstein accusers and gives slightly more detail including that she was 16 at the time and the other 16-year-old was described as her best friend.
The woman ‘named other individuals involved in “big orgy parties” with her, other young girls, and older Victoria’s Secret models…’, the document states.
Tal Alexander (front, blue shorts) and identical twins Oren and Alon (back row) faced 10 counts relating to federal sex trafficking charges
The brothers were luxury real estate tycoons. Tal, left, and Oren lived in this property in Miami Beach
Next to the woman’s statements, an FBI agent wrote: ‘Complainant was spoken to and deemed not credible. Additional research showed 3 separate (redacted)’.
The document released by the DOJ from the Epstein files stated: ‘Complainant reported participating in orgies and that some girls went missing, rumored to have been murdered and buried at the facility.’
But in a New York Times interview published in February a woman claimed that Tal Alexander – who was still in high school at the time – raped her at a party in Bal Harbour, Florida, when she was 13 years old.
The woman said she was in eighth grade in late 2002 or early 2003 at the time of the incident. No charges have been filed in connection with the allegation.
Deanna Paul, a lawyer for Tal Alexander, told the Times that the claim, made before the brothers were convicted, was ‘categorically false’.
The three were found guilty on ten counts of using their wealth and influence to drug and rape multiple women at Manhattan federal court
The parents of the high-profile real estate agent brothers react as a jury foreperson reads the verdict in their federal sex trafficking trial
The Alexander brothers are due to be sentenced on August 6 and face life in jail.
A spokesman for all three brothers told the Daily Mail that the allegations in the Epstein files were ‘false’ and their release had created ‘confusion and reputational damage’.
The spokesman said: ‘The Epstein files contain a wide range of raw and unverified claims involving numerous public figures.
‘It is important for readers to understand the distinction between allegations recorded during an intake interview and findings supported by evidence. In this instance, the FBI concluded the account lacked credibility and no action was taken.
‘What was particularly troubling was the Justice Department’s decision to release this material while the federal trial was underway before a non-sequestered jury, creating the risk of prejudice from unsubstantiated claims that investigators themselves had already discounted.’
