WASHINGTON — The Republican chairs of three House committees on Monday warned that they may move to hold ActBlue in contempt of Congress, escalating a dispute with the Democratic fundraising platform over its refusal to provide more than 400 documents it says are protected by attorney-client privilege.
In a letter to the organization, House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan of Ohio and Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer of Kentucky set a Friday deadline for ActBlue to turn over the materials. The requested records include communications from two members of ActBlue’s legal team that the lawmakers say raise questions about whether the platform was transparent about foreign donations allegedly routed illegally to Democratic campaigns.
“These documents reportedly contain evidence that ActBlue accepted foreign donations, misled Congress, and then retaliated against an employee who spoke up about it,” the lawmakers wrote. “ActBlue appears to be withholding these documents from the Committees in an attempt to cover up the scope and duration of its misconduct.”
The letter cites the February 2025 resignation of ActBlue interim general counsel Aaron Ting, who stepped down after a call with company leaders and outside attorneys. According to the lawmakers, Ting warned that ActBlue was “not fully committed to transparently addressing with the Board the seriousness of our most pressing concerns: the legal compliance of ActBlue’s past practices for screening political donations from abroad and its past representations to Congress regarding foreign donations and related matters.”
The committee chairs also pointed to an internal Slack message sent days later by Zain Ahmad, described as ActBlue’s only full-time lawyer. In the message, Ahmad allegedly said “he was retaliated against for blowing the whistle on internal misconduct,” according to the lawmakers.
The New York Times first reported in April on the internal turmoil involving Ting and Ahmad.
Steil, Jordan and Comer said ActBlue did not provide a privilege log until June 5 and then withheld Ting’s resignation letter, Ahmad’s message and hundreds of additional records. “On June 5, ActBlue belatedly produced a log of responsive materials that it deemed privileged, but refused to produce Mr. Ting’s resignation letter or Mr. Ahmad’s message. Instead, ActBlue claimed attorney-client privilege over the entirety of these and 420 other documents,” they wrote.
The lawmakers disputed that claim, arguing the two highlighted communications do not appear to qualify for protection. “The Committees struggle to understand how Mr. Ting’s resignation letter or Mr. Ahmad’s internal message could be privileged. Neither document could have been ‘made for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal advice,’” they added.
ALSO READ: Iowa TV Anchor Breaks Down On-Air as He Quits Journalism and Blasts His Station
“Based on available evidence and common sense, the purpose of Mr. Ting’s resignation letter was to terminate his employment with ActBlue, and the purpose of Mr. Ahmad’s message was to make a claim of retaliation against ActBlue. As such, both documents were prepared and transmitted by these attorneys in the context of an employee-employer dispute with ActBlue, and not in an attorney-client context for purpose of providing legal advice.”
Monday’s letter follows a June 10 appearance before Congress by ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones, during which she took the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer questions.
In a separate video statement, Wallace-Jones accused the three GOP chairmen of “abusing their power to target ActBlue” and emphasized that taking the Fifth was “not an admission — or even an insinuation — of guilt.”
President Trump has also authorized the Department of Justice to investigate “straw donors” and other illicit funding of federal campaign, she noted.
Ting and Ahmad had already been compelled to appear for depositions with the committees last year but invoked the Fifth Amendment as well, as did another former ActBlue lawyer, its VP of customer service, and a fraud specialist.
Collectively, all five ActBlue employees invoked their right against self-incrimination 146 times.
ActBlue has helped Democratic campaigns and causes raise more than $19 billion since it was founded in 2004.
Nearly $2 billion of those funds flowed to Democrats during the 2024 election cycle, at the same time that internal records, later obtained by The Post, showed ActBlue made its fraud standards “more lenient.”
The Times reported that Ting’s resignation followed a pair of memos from ActBlue’s then-legal firm, Covington & Burling, that warned it could “be alleged that ActBlue accepted and/or facilitated the acceptance of foreign-national contributions into American elections,” in violation of federal law.
Separately, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued the platform for accepting contributions from allegedly fraudulent donors after his investigators were able to use fake identities to submit funds.
A Massachusetts federal judge blocked the lawsuit on June 11, ruling that it was “undoubtedly an adverse action” taken against Paxton’s opponent in the Texas Senate race, former Democratic state lawmaker James Talarico.
Reps for ActBlue did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
