Judge refuses to expunge record of man exonerated for Jan. 6
Share this @internewscast.com

Matthew Martin at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 (DOJ).

A man from New Mexico, who was acquitted of criminal charges related to the January 6th incident at the U.S. Capitol, is not allowed to have the records of his arrest and trial expunged, as ruled by a federal judge in Washington, D.C.

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, on Friday, dismissed the request to remove Matthew Martin’s records, who had previously described the Capitol riot as a “magical day.”

McFadden found Martin not guilty of multiple misdemeanors following a bench trial three years ago.

In a nine-page opinion, McFadden, appointed by President Donald Trump during his first term, explained that even though Martin was “fully acquitted” of the January 6 charges, federal appellate courts have established that an individual needs to demonstrate evidence of rights violations before a district court can consider expungement. In this case, Martin did not even “allege a violation of a statutory or constitutional right,” according to the judge.

Instead, Martin asserted that his record was clean before and after the trial, he was acquitted after an adjudication on the merits, his case is associated with the “most highly publicized criminal prosecution in the country”s history,” and his FBI background check information is now “inaccurate and prejudicial without serving any proper purpose.”

He argued that previous cases had established a “right not to be adversely affected by government records when their information is “inaccurate,” “acquired by fatally flawed procedures,” or “prejudicial without serving any proper purpose.”

But none of those reasons met the legal threshold for his record to be expunged, McFadden found.

“In sum, Martin has not attempted to show a statutory or constitutional violation during his arrest, trial, or conviction,” McFadden wrote. “So this Court has no violation on which to rest the equitable remedy of expungement. His motion is denied.”

The court also noted that while Martin claimed he was fired from his job immediately after being charged “because of his association with Jan. 6th events,” he previously indicated that he was “not requesting expungement for employment reasons.”

As Law&Crime previously reported, McFadden in April 2022 found Martin not guilty on charges that included entering a restricted building and disorderly conduct in a Capitol building. The judge said federal prosecutors failed to prove the “requisite scienter” for the crimes “in large part because a Capitol police officer arguably appeared to allow Martin into the building.”

Following the two-day trial, McFadden reportedly said that despite multiple clues that the Capitol grounds and building were restricted, Martin’s belief that he had permission enter the building was “plausible” because police officers didn’t try to stop him.

In a trial brief, prosecutors said that Martin went to the Capitol from his hotel room at some point after the first breach of the building had occurred. On his way there, he passed a line of police cars, signs announcing that areas of the Capitol grounds were closed, and smashed windowpanes at the Rotunda doors. Alarms that prosecutors described as “piercingly loud” could be heard on video recordings Martin made on his phone.

Nevertheless, Martin walked into the Rotunda, passing police officers who were standing on either side of the doorway. According to prosecutors, Martin was inside the building for around 10 minutes. He recorded footage on his cellphone, and although he didn’t engage in any violence, he did join a crowd that was “facing down officers” before he left, prosecutors said.

That evening, Martin texted with his supervisor.

“You can’t overrun the capital [sic] building,” the supervisor said, according to court filings.

“Actually you can, rather easily I might add,” Martin responded. “Not as much security as you think. Our numbers were freaking huge. They were not prepared.”

In announcing his verdict, McFadden reportedly described Martin’s conduct at the Capitol as “minimal and non-serious,” noting that he didn’t try to crowd police, protest, or wave his Trump flag inside the building. The judge appears to have weighed the fact that Martin didn’t interfere with officers fighting back rioters as a factor in the defendant’s favor, and not as yet another indication to Martin that he shouldn’t have been there.

Martin was reportedly unapologetic at trial, describing Jan. 6 as “magical” and stating that he did not regret traveling to Washington, D.C., for the pro-Trump rally.

Martin was the first accused Capitol rioter to be fully acquitted of charges in connection to Jan. 6.

 

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Judge Criticizes Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice in Luigi Mangione Case

Left: Attorney General Pam Bondi speaks as Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche…

Judge Dismisses Remaining Parts of Peter Strzok’s Lawsuit Over His Dismissal

Left: Judge Amy Berman Jackson at an awards breakfast for pro bono…

Kilmar Abrego Garcia Tries to Sway the Referees

Inset: Kilmar Abrego Garcia in an undated photo (CASA). Background: President Donald…

Man Severely Assaults Girlfriend for Using His Vape: DA Report

Inset: Nicholas Vincuillo (Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The apartment complex in…

Lawsuit Alleges State Trooper Punched Disabled Man During Seizure Following Crash

Background: A North Carolina Highway Patrol state trooper vehicle (North Carolina Department…

“14-Year-Old Georgia Girl Missing, May Have Been Lured Online”

A Georgia family is pushing for answers after their 14-year-old DeKalb County…

Teen Girl’s Remains Identified; 2023 Disappearance Now a Homicide Investigation

Remains discovered earlier this month in Alaska belong to a woman who…

Five Teens Arrested Following Intense Police Chase Across Melbourne

Dramatic police helicopter vision has captured a lengthy pursuit across Melbourne’s south-east…

Man Accidentally Shoots and Kills Girl During Attempt to Stop Armed Robbery

Inset: Arlene Alvarez (Compean Funeral Homes). Background: Tony Earls was found guilty…

Mother accused of killing daughter, alleged she fell down stairs: Police

Inset: Jamie Drain (John J. Ferry and Sons Funeral Home), Background: Raja…

Tyler McCain, Accused of Killing His Wife, Nikki McCain, Mother of Four, to Face Trial

The concluding day of Tyler McCain’s preliminary hearing concluded with a California…

Husband Who Murdered Wife in Graveyard Receives Sentence

Inset: Jeremy Hinson (Madison County Sheriff’s Office). Background: Forrestville Cemetery in Indiana…