Sotomayor slams SCOTUS for 'gross' abuse of discretion
Share this @internewscast.com

Main: President Donald Trump leaves the Rose Garden at the White House after signing an executive order to introduce new tariffs on Wednesday, April 2, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Evan Vucci). Inset: Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor engages in a conversation with retired U.S. Appeals Court Judge Thomas Griffith, who isn’t shown, during a discussion at the National Governors Association’s winter gathering on February 23, 2024, in Washington (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein, File).

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative block supported the Trump administration by granting a stay on a district court’s temporary injunction while the appeal is ongoing. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, representing the liberal view, openly criticized the majority, accusing them of “turn[ing] a blind eye” and “endorsing unlawful actions” by allowing the government to resume “third-country” deportations.

To grant the stay, the court required the approval of five justices, which the nine-member court managed to achieve without the support of dissenters Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

As recently as early June, immigration lawyers opposing the Trump administration’s stay application urged the high court not to lose sight of the government’s “own choices — to violate the district court’s orders” by moving to “deport two groups of class members to Libya and South Sudan” even after U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued the injunction in April.

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

At the start of that order, Murphy summarized what the “third-country” deportations entailed, described the stakes as life and death, and remarked confidently on the Supreme Court justices’ views, citing to the high court’s agreement on judicial review in Alien Enemies Act litigation.

“Defendants argue that the United States may send a deportable alien to a country not of their origin, not where an immigration judge has ordered, where they may be immediately tortured and killed, without providing that person any opportunity to tell the deporting authorities that they face grave danger or death because of such a deportation,” Murphy wrote. “All nine sitting justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Assistant Solicitor General of the United States, Congress, common sense, basic decency, and this Court all disagree.”

On Monday, Sotomayor struck a mournful tone as the Supreme Court stayed an injunction that, in her view, had “manage[d] this high-stakes litigation with […] care and attention” and “prevented worse outcomes.” And yet, wrote Sotomayor, the Trump administration won “emergency relief from an order it has repeatedly defied.”

“I cannot join so gross an abuse of the Court’s equitable discretion,” she added.

Writing that the Trump administration “openly flouted two court orders” with “no-notice” deportations, Sotomayor called this “misconduct” a threat to the “core” of the “rule of law.”

Next, the justice issued a dire assessment of the state of affairs.

“This is not the first time the Court closes its eyes to noncompliance, nor, I fear, will it be the last,” Sotomayor said. “Yet each time this Court rewards noncompliance with discretionary relief, it further erodes respect for courts and for the rule of law.”

The Monday lifting of Murphy’s injunction, Sotomayor continued, exposes “thousands to the risk of torture or death.”

In parting shots, Sotomayor likened the Trump administration’s “posture” to that of an “arsonist who calls 911 to report firefighters for violating a local noise ordinance.”

Accusing the Supreme Court of “rewarding lawlessness,” Sotomayor wrote that she had to “[r]espectfully, but regretfully,” dissent.

“Apparently, the Court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in farflung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a District Court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the Government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled,” she concluded. “That use of discretion is as incomprehensible as it is inexcusable.”

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Indiana Father Sentenced for Neglect Leading to Daughter’s Death from Type 1 Diabetes Complications

An Indiana courtroom witnessed the sentencing of an Evansville father on Thursday,…

New Image Emerges: Melodee Buzzard Spotted in Wig Amid Ongoing Search for Missing 9-Year-Old

Recent developments in the case of Melodee Buzzard, a young girl from…

Intoxicated Corvette Driver Involved in High-Speed Collision at 135 mph: Police Report

Left inset: Natalie Pierre (GoFundMe). Right inset: Dale Drotar (Palm Beach County…

Shocking Twist: Key Suspect in Jodi Husentruit Case Now Tied to Wisconsin Mother’s Mysterious Death

In a chilling development linking two cold cases, a man connected to…

Tragic New York Fire Claims Lives of Mom and Newborn; Boyfriend Faces Charges

A man in New York state faces charges for allegedly murdering his…

Self-Defense Debunked: Man’s Excessive Force in 32-Shot Neighbor Shooting Revealed

Inset left: Trevor McEuen (Texas Department of Public Safety). Right: Aaron Martinez…

Shocking Case: Mother Faces Charges in Alleged Attempted Drowning of Her Three Children

Background: The home of the family whose three children were allegedly found…

Man Arrested Twice in Six Days Amidst Investigation for Allegedly Stalking Female College Students

Staff Report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – Authorities have arrested 40-year-old Andrew Stephenson Wise…

Tragic House Fire Leads to Shocking Murder and Arson Charges Against Woman

Warning: This article contains the name and image of a deceased Indigenous…

Trio Sentenced After $100 Million Drug Cargo Capsizes Cruiser

Three men have been handed a collective prison sentence of 29 years…

Expert Taskforce Assumes Command in the Search for Dezi Freeman

An expert taskforce is set to spearhead the ongoing hunt for Dezi…

FBI Arrests Suspect in Chilling TikTok Death Threats Against Pam Bondi

Attorney General Pam Bondi appears before a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing…