Trump asks SCOTUS to permit mass firing of federal workers
Share this @internewscast.com

President Donald Trump addresses a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House on Friday, May 30, 2025, in Washington (AP Photo/Evan Vucci).

The Trump administration is again requesting the U.S. Supreme Court to lift an injunction from a federal court in California, aiming to proceed with the president’s plans to reorganize federal agencies and conduct mass terminations, which would significantly reduce the federal workforce.

An emergency filing on Monday marks the Department of Justice’s second request for the high court’s intervention in this matter. Initially, the administration sought the court’s involvement on May 16, following U.S. District Judge Susan Illston’s approval of a temporary restraining order requested by the plaintiffs to pause the firings. However, this filing was retracted once the injunction lapsed after two weeks.

Illston subsequently issued a preliminary injunction which a three-judge panel on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to stay in a 2-1 vote on Friday.

U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer excoriated Illston’s order in the petition to the justices, arguing that her injunction “rests on the indefensible premise that the President needs explicit statutory authorization from Congress to exercise his core Article II authority to superintend the internal personnel decisions of the Executive Branch.”

“Controlling the personnel of federal agencies lies at the heartland of this authority,” the filing states. “The Constitution does not erect a presumption against presidential control of agency staffing, and the President does not need special permission from Congress to exercise core Article II powers. The district court’s injunction violates these bedrock principles and other well-established doctrines.”

Love true crime? Sign up for our newsletter, The Law&Crime Docket, to get the latest real-life crime stories delivered right to your inbox.

On Feb. 11, President Donald Trump issued an executive order entitled “Implementing The President’s ‘Department Of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative.” The order purported to “commence” a “critical transformation of the Federal bureaucracy” by “eliminating waste, bloat, and insularity.”

In a 115-page complaint, the plaintiffs alleged various separations of powers violations, arguing Trump’s order unconstitutionally oversteps into areas reserved for Congress. The complaint also alleged numerous violations of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the broad statute governing agency actions.

As Law&Crime previously reported, Trump’s plans would have had administrative agency heads quickly begin initiating “large-scale reductions in force” (RIFs), or massive layoffs, in service of the goal to restructure the government.

Illston pumped the brakes on those efforts.

The lower court reasoned the three agencies principally tasked with the firings and reorganization — the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — simply lacked the requisite statutory authority to carry out such tasks.

“In sum, no statute gives OPM, OMB, or DOGE the authority to direct other federal agencies to engage in large-scale terminations, restructuring, or elimination of itself,” Illston wrote in the May order. “Such action is far outside the bounds of any authority that Congress vested in OPM or OMB, and, as noted, DOGE has no statutory authority whatsoever.”

The appeals court echoed the district court’s findings on the authority of the three agencies tasked with the reorganization plans — finding each agency acted beyond its statutory authority.

“As Defendants concede, OMB and OPM have only supervisory authority over the other federal agencies,” the order stated. “DOGE has no statutory authority whatsoever. We therefore agree with the district court that these organizations’ actions directing other federal agencies to engage in restructuring and large-scale RIFs were ultra vires.”

The administration on Monday asserted that from a substantive perspective, the “general direction and guidance” prescribed in Trump’s executive order and subsequent memo are “unquestionably lawful,” reasoning that the “entire executive power belongs to the President alone.”

“That includes the power to effectuate policy objectives by directing agencies to exercise their statutory authority to conduct RIFs, subject to the guidance of OPM and OMB, so long as it is done in a manner that is fully consistent with law,” Sauer wrote. “The district court turned the constitutional structure upside down by treating as supposed ‘evidence’ of ‘unlawful action’ the mere prospect that ‘agencies are acting at the direction of the President and his team.””

The administration also argued it was “meritless” for the district court to assert that Trump, as president, cannot “fundamentally reorganize” federal agencies with out the express consent of Congress, emphasizing that federal bureaucrats were never intended to become “a class with lifetime employment, whether there was work for them to do or not.”

Justice Elena Kagan, who handles emergency petitions out of the 9th Circuit, ordered the plaintiffs in the case to respond by June 9, 2025.

Share this @internewscast.com
You May Also Like

Shocking Incident: 5-Year-Old Left Alone on Street as Mom Shops at Target

Inset: Maureen O’Neill (Walton County Jail). Background: Walton County Sheriff’s Office (Google…

Shocking Family Tragedy: Son Fatally Shoots Mother After Bedtime Dispute

Kevin Marin (Doña Ana County Detention Center). In a disturbing incident in…

Police Report: Daughter Allegedly Kills Mother with Rock in Shocking Incident

Inset left to right: Lauren Spors (Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office). Background: The…

Tragic Incident at Spirit Halloween: Security Guard Fatally Confronts Alleged Shoplifter

Inset: Josiah Armijo (Metropolitan Detention Center). Background: The Spirit Halloween store located…

Jared Fogle’s Surprising Prison Life: How the Former Subway Spokesman is Spending His Time Behind Bars

Jared Fogle, once the face of Subway, asserts that he was misled…

Urgent Update: Discovery of Female Remains in Woods Intensifies Search Efforts for Missing Kada Scott

Authorities have reportedly uncovered human remains on Saturday during the ongoing investigation…

Unveiling the Chilling Pursuit: How a Suspect Trailed Kada Scott Before Her Mysterious Disappearance

A Pennsylvania man implicated in the disappearance of a local woman will…

Basement Captive Case Escalates: Suspect Faces Murder Charges, According to Police

Inset: Donnie Ray Birchfield (Lancaster County Detention Center). Background: A blurred image…

Police Report: Child, 9, Found in Hot Car After Day While Mother Worked

Background: The Galena Park plant on the 1200 block of Mayo Shell…

Probationary Teenager Faces Charges for Alleged Preschooler Molestation

Staff report GAINESVILLE, Fla. – In a troubling development, 19-year-old Devin Christopher…

Trio Faces Charges Following Burglary Incident in South-East Melbourne

Three men have been charged following a daring robbery involving stolen vehicles…

Judge Condemns Trump’s Administration for Misleading Court Order Interpretation

President Donald Trump speaks before a lunch with Ukraine”s President Volodymyr Zelenskyy…